Ultrasound Locating The Epidural Space : Transverse Median Versus Paramedian Sagittal View

Introduction: The aim of our study was to compare two ultrasound techniques lookout yellow ligament from the transverse median versus versus paramedian sagittal view.Materials and methods: we conducted a randomized prospective study of 40 patients proposed for total knee replacement. They were rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author Hamdi, Mehdi
Format Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published Morressier 01.01.2017
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: The aim of our study was to compare two ultrasound techniques lookout yellow ligament from the transverse median versus versus paramedian sagittal view.Materials and methods: we conducted a randomized prospective study of 40 patients proposed for total knee replacement. They were randomized into two groups:- GM: the identification of the yellow ligament is performed in the transverse median section.- GP: we use the paramedian sagittal section.for all patients, there is an ultrasound tracking and tranversal median sagittal space epidural puncture. Then landmark in each group the ligamentum flavum and its depth is calculated relative to the skin.The epidural anesthesia procedure is thereafter performed according to the conventional technique of loss of resistance. We want the end of the procedure to measure, using the Tuohy trocar, the actual distance between the skin and the yellow ligament.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software 22.TResults: The age (years): GM :64.2 u00b1 8.4 in GM vs63.7 u00b1 9.6 in GP (p= 0.43) ; BMI(kg/m2) :25.8 u00b1 3.6in GM vs26.4 u00b1 2.9in GP (p=2,3);The median sagittal identification (min): 0.86 u00b1 0.17in GM vs 0.84 u00b1 0.19 in GP (p=0.41); The median transverse locating(min):0.41 u00b1 0.12in GM vs 0.39 u00b1 0.14 in GP (p=0.37)The identification of the yellow ligament (min) :2.03 u00b1 0.17in GM vs1.85 u00b1 0.13in GP (p = 0.019);The duration of the procedure (min) 5.12 u00b1 0.9 4.93 u00b1 0.98 0.72; The number of attempts 27/20 23/20 0.27; The volume of 0.125% isobaric bupivacau00efne (ml) 37.4 u00b1 4.6 35.6 u00b1 3.9 0.29; The incidence of redirection of the needle:25/20in GM vs 1.15 23/20in GP (p=0.49).Distance between skin and yellow ligament in GM (cm):4.85 u00b1 0.43 vs 5.16 u00b1 0.46 in GP (p=0,23). The correlation between calculated and measured distance in GM (p of Pearson=0,84) and in GM (p=0,925).Studentu00b4s test comparing the two differences averages is not statistically significant difference with p = 0.22 between GM and GP.Onset time of sensory block(min): 18.6 u00b1 2.2in GM vs 17.4 u00b1 1.8 in GP(p=0.35);installation time of the motor block(min): 28.4 u00b1 7.4in GM vs 29.2 u00b1 8.6in GP(p=0.65); Dura breach:3 cases in Gm vs 1 case in GP (p=0.11);The postoperative bleeding(ml) 483.8 u00b1 127.8 in GM vs 506.4 u00b1 145.9in GP (p=0.12);Satisfied patients 18/20in GMvs 19/20 in GP (p=0.83).Conclusion: Ultrasound locating the epidural space, whether performed in the transverse median or paramedian sagittal cut is an easy technique to achieve with a low incidence of complications.
Bibliography:MODID-759a0011d80:Morressier 2020-2021
DOI:10.26226/morressier.57108e2dd462b80290b49fee