Inverse Modeling of Respiratory System during Noninvasive Ventilation by Maximum Likelihood Estimation

We propose a procedure to estimate the model parameters of presented nonlinear Resistance-Capacitance (RC) and the widely used linear Resistance-Inductance-Capacitance (RIC) models of the respiratory system by Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE). The measurement noise is assumed to be Generalized Gau...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEURASIP journal on advances in signal processing Vol. 2010; no. 1; p. 237562
Main Authors Saatci, Esra, Akan, Aydin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer Nature B.V 01.01.2010
BioMed Central Ltd
SpringerOpen
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1687-6172
1687-6180
1687-6180
DOI10.1186/1687-6180-2010-237562

Cover

More Information
Summary:We propose a procedure to estimate the model parameters of presented nonlinear Resistance-Capacitance (RC) and the widely used linear Resistance-Inductance-Capacitance (RIC) models of the respiratory system by Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE). The measurement noise is assumed to be Generalized Gaussian Distributed (GGD), and the variance and the shape factor of the measurement noise are estimated by MLE and Kurtosis method, respectively. The performance of the MLE algorithm is also demonstrated by the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) with artificially produced respiratory signals. Airway flow, mask pressure, and lung volume are measured from patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) under the noninvasive ventilation and from healthy subjects. Simulations show that respiratory signals from healthy subjects are better represented by the RIC model compared to the nonlinear RC model. On the other hand, the Patient group respiratory signals are fitted to the nonlinear RC model with lower measurement noise variance, better converged measurement noise shape factor, and model parameter tracks. Also, it is observed that for the Patient group the shape factor of the measurement noise converges to values between 1 and 2 whereas for the Control group shape factor values are estimated in the super-Gaussian area.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1687-6172
1687-6180
1687-6180
DOI:10.1186/1687-6180-2010-237562