Approximating activation edge-cover and facility location problems
What approximation ratio can we achieve for the Facility Location problem if whenever a client $u$ connects to a facility $v$,the opening cost of $v$ is at most $\theta$ times the service cost of $u$? We show that this and many other problems are a particular case of the Activation Edge-Cover proble...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
24.12.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | What approximation ratio can we achieve for the Facility Location problem if
whenever a client $u$ connects to a facility $v$,the opening cost of $v$ is at
most $\theta$ times the service cost of $u$? We show that this and many other
problems are a particular case of the Activation Edge-Cover problem. Here we
are given a multigraph $G=(V,E)$, a set $R \subseteq V$ of terminals, and
thresholds $\{t^e_u,t^e_v\}$ for each $uv$-edge $e \in E$. The goal is to find
an assignment ${\bf a}=\{a_v:v \in V\}$ to the nodes minimizing $\sum_{v \in V}
a_v$, such that the edge set $E_{\bf a}=\{e=uv: a_u \geq t^e_u, a_v \geq
t^e_v\}$ activated by ${\bf a}$ covers $R$. We obtain ratio $1+\omega(\theta)
\approx \ln \theta-\ln \ln \theta$ for the problem, where $\omega(\theta)$ is
the root of the equation $x+1=\ln(\theta/x)$ and $\theta$ is a problem
parameter. This result is based on a simple generic algorithm for the problem
of minimizing a sum of a decreasing and a sub-additive set functions, which is
of independent interest. As an application, we get that the above variant of
Facility Location admits ratio $1+\omega(\theta)$; if for each facility all
service costs are identical then we show a better ratio $\displaystyle
1+\max_{k \geq 1} \frac{H_k-1}{1+k/\theta}$, where $H_k=\sum_{i=1}^k 1/i$. For
the Min-Power Edge-Cover problem we improve the ratio $1.406$ of Calinescu et.
al. (achieved by iterative randomized rounding) to $1+\omega(1)<1.2785$. For
unit thresholds we improve the ratio $73/60 \approx 1.217$ to
$\frac{1555}{1347} \approx 1.155$. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1812.09880 |