The nature of instructional effects in color constancy
The instructions subjects receive can have a large effect on experimentally measured color constancy, but the nature of these effects and how their existence should inform our understanding of color perception remains unclear. We used a factorial design to measure how instructional effects on consta...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance Vol. 42; no. 6; p. 847 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.06.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The instructions subjects receive can have a large effect on experimentally measured color constancy, but the nature of these effects and how their existence should inform our understanding of color perception remains unclear. We used a factorial design to measure how instructional effects on constancy vary with experimental task and stimulus set. In each of 2 experiments, we employed both a classic adjustment-based asymmetric matching task and a novel color selection task. Four groups of naive subjects were instructed to make adjustments/selections based on (a) color (neutral instructions); (b) the light reaching the eye (physical spectrum instructions); (c) the actual surface reflectance of an object (objective reflectance instructions); or (d) the apparent surface reflectance of an object (apparent reflectance instructions). Across the 2 experiments we varied the naturalness of the stimuli. We find clear interactions between instructions, task, and stimuli. With simplified stimuli (Experiment 1), instructional effects were large and the data revealed 2 instruction-dependent patterns. In 1 (neutral and physical spectrum instructions) constancy was low, intersubject variability was also low, and adjustment-based and selection-based constancy were in agreement. In the other (reflectance instructions) constancy was high, intersubject variability was large, adjustment-based constancy deviated from selection-based constancy and for some subjects selection-based constancy increased across sessions. Similar patterns held for naturalistic stimuli (Experiment 2), although instructional effects were smaller. We interpret these 2 patterns as signatures of distinct task strategies-1 is perceptual, with judgments based primarily on the perceptual representation of color; the other involves explicit instruction-driven reasoning. (PsycINFO Database Record |
---|---|
AbstractList | The instructions subjects receive can have a large effect on experimentally measured color constancy, but the nature of these effects and how their existence should inform our understanding of color perception remains unclear. We used a factorial design to measure how instructional effects on constancy vary with experimental task and stimulus set. In each of 2 experiments, we employed both a classic adjustment-based asymmetric matching task and a novel color selection task. Four groups of naive subjects were instructed to make adjustments/selections based on (a) color (neutral instructions); (b) the light reaching the eye (physical spectrum instructions); (c) the actual surface reflectance of an object (objective reflectance instructions); or (d) the apparent surface reflectance of an object (apparent reflectance instructions). Across the 2 experiments we varied the naturalness of the stimuli. We find clear interactions between instructions, task, and stimuli. With simplified stimuli (Experiment 1), instructional effects were large and the data revealed 2 instruction-dependent patterns. In 1 (neutral and physical spectrum instructions) constancy was low, intersubject variability was also low, and adjustment-based and selection-based constancy were in agreement. In the other (reflectance instructions) constancy was high, intersubject variability was large, adjustment-based constancy deviated from selection-based constancy and for some subjects selection-based constancy increased across sessions. Similar patterns held for naturalistic stimuli (Experiment 2), although instructional effects were smaller. We interpret these 2 patterns as signatures of distinct task strategies-1 is perceptual, with judgments based primarily on the perceptual representation of color; the other involves explicit instruction-driven reasoning. (PsycINFO Database Record |
Author | Radonjić, Ana Brainard, David H |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ana surname: Radonjić fullname: Radonjić, Ana organization: Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania – sequence: 2 givenname: David H surname: Brainard fullname: Brainard, David H organization: Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26727021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1T81KAzEY_BDF_ujFB5B9gdUku0maoxStQqGX9ly-JF_oyjZZdrNg396F6hxmYAaGmQXcxhQJ4ImzF84q_fpz6tgEvqpvYM5NZUoutJ7BYhi-r4G8h5lQWmgm-BzU_kRFxDz2VKRQNHHI_ehykyK2BYVALg-TW7jUpn7iKcfoLg9wF7Ad6PFPl3D4eN-vP8vtbvO1ftuWKJXJJUckUqQ0U5wCSetJB2u0lyumlLfeoiA9reHOenSG1ZVgFrmvrWSGvFjC87W3G-2Z_LHrmzP2l-P_AfELfxxH7g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2019_05_044 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_7_8 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_2_7 crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_479961 crossref_primary_10_1111_desc_13306 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_22_5_2 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_091517_034231 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_20_13_18 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_20_12_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11097_020_09705_y crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_093020_112820 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00906_2017 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_61179 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_030320_041152 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2019_10_004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved). |
Copyright_xml | – notice: (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved). |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1037/xhp0000184 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology |
EISSN | 1939-1277 |
ExternalDocumentID | 26727021 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: P30 EY001583 – fundername: NEI NIH HHS grantid: R01 EY010016 |
GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ -ET -~X .-4 .GJ 0R~ 186 29K 354 41~ 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6TJ 6TS 7RZ 85S 8VB 9M8 AAAHA AAYOK ABCQX ABDPE ABIVO ABNCP ABPPZ ACGFO ACKIV ACNCT ACPQG ACPRK AEHFB AEMOZ AFFNX AHQJS AI. AKVCP ALEEW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AWKKM AZXWR BKOMP CGNQK CGR CS3 CUY CVF D-I EBR EBU ECM EIF EMK EPA F5P FTD HVGLF HZ~ H~9 ISO K1G L7B LPU LW5 MVM NHB NPM O9- OHT OPA OVD P-O P2P PKN PQQKQ QWB ROL RXW S10 SES SPA TAE TEORI TH9 TN5 UBC UHB UHS UPT VH1 VQA WH7 XJT XOL XZL YIF YIN YQT YR5 YYP YYQ YZZ ZCA ZCG ZKG ZL0 ZPI ZXP |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a569t-1aaee6e67061efe5bde7fb97d58066dbdba2e72671cbdac904320ba1d4b509ed2 |
IngestDate | Wed Feb 19 02:44:14 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
License | (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved). |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a569t-1aaee6e67061efe5bde7fb97d58066dbdba2e72671cbdac904320ba1d4b509ed2 |
OpenAccessLink | http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/42/6/847.pdf |
PMID | 26727021 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_26727021 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2016 text: 2016-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
References | 8255708 - Percept Psychophys. 1993 Oct;54(4):457-68 17357719 - Spat Vis. 2007;20(1-2):139-54 18053846 - Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(28):3409-23 3772637 - J Opt Soc Am A. 1986 Oct;3(10):1743-51 24511145 - J Vis. 2014;14(2). pii: 6. doi: 10.1167/14.2.6 10343819 - Vision Res. 1999 Apr;39(8):1531-50 8594812 - Vision Res. 1995 Sep;35(17):2431-48 18613631 - Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):828-40 8255707 - Percept Psychophys. 1993 Oct;54(4):446-56 15493968 - J Vis. 2004 Sep 8;4(9):747-63 25981792 - Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 29;25(13):R547-8 1780207 - Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):591-602 20849875 - Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):674-700 20858514 - Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):652-73 15005648 - J Vis. 2004;4(2):57-81 2045968 - J Opt Soc Am A. 1991 Apr;8(4):661-72 9291602 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997 Sep;14(9):2091-110 3430215 - J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Dec;4(12):2281-5 10526341 - Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1010-4 26381834 - J Vis. 2015;15(13):3 12088242 - Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):492-519 25954181 - Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 21;9:205 18372745 - Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):219-28 21196510 - J Vis. 2010;10(14). pii: 40. doi: 10.1167/10.14.40 25165517 - Iperception. 2014 Jan 28;5(1):53-72 4742442 - Br J Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24 24464163 - J Vis. 2014;14(1). pii: 24. doi: 10.1167/14.1.24 26024460 - J Vis. 2015;15(6):13 9176953 - Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 14632609 - J Vis. 2003;3(8):573-85 9176952 - Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 24586299 - PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87989 21688072 - Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1886-902 9874814 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 5;96(1):307-12 18831597 - J Vis. 2008;8(11):3.1-14 15744303 - Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):79-83 24349701 - Iperception. 2013 Aug 14;4(6):437-55 16617831 - Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jan;68(1):76-83 7208266 - Percept Psychophys. 1980 Dec;28(6):527-38 |
References_xml | – reference: 8255707 - Percept Psychophys. 1993 Oct;54(4):446-56 – reference: 25981792 - Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 29;25(13):R547-8 – reference: 4742442 - Br J Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24 – reference: 3430215 - J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Dec;4(12):2281-5 – reference: 20849875 - Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):674-700 – reference: 9176953 - Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 – reference: 9291602 - J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997 Sep;14(9):2091-110 – reference: 10343819 - Vision Res. 1999 Apr;39(8):1531-50 – reference: 24349701 - Iperception. 2013 Aug 14;4(6):437-55 – reference: 18372745 - Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):219-28 – reference: 15005648 - J Vis. 2004;4(2):57-81 – reference: 15744303 - Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):79-83 – reference: 8594812 - Vision Res. 1995 Sep;35(17):2431-48 – reference: 25954181 - Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 21;9:205 – reference: 25165517 - Iperception. 2014 Jan 28;5(1):53-72 – reference: 1780207 - Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):591-602 – reference: 24511145 - J Vis. 2014;14(2). pii: 6. doi: 10.1167/14.2.6 – reference: 26024460 - J Vis. 2015;15(6):13 – reference: 17357719 - Spat Vis. 2007;20(1-2):139-54 – reference: 9176952 - Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 – reference: 21688072 - Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1886-902 – reference: 3772637 - J Opt Soc Am A. 1986 Oct;3(10):1743-51 – reference: 2045968 - J Opt Soc Am A. 1991 Apr;8(4):661-72 – reference: 18613631 - Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):828-40 – reference: 24464163 - J Vis. 2014;14(1). pii: 24. doi: 10.1167/14.1.24 – reference: 10526341 - Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1010-4 – reference: 12088242 - Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):492-519 – reference: 15493968 - J Vis. 2004 Sep 8;4(9):747-63 – reference: 18053846 - Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(28):3409-23 – reference: 16617831 - Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jan;68(1):76-83 – reference: 7208266 - Percept Psychophys. 1980 Dec;28(6):527-38 – reference: 9874814 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 5;96(1):307-12 – reference: 26381834 - J Vis. 2015;15(13):3 – reference: 20858514 - Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):652-73 – reference: 18831597 - J Vis. 2008;8(11):3.1-14 – reference: 14632609 - J Vis. 2003;3(8):573-85 – reference: 24586299 - PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87989 – reference: 21196510 - J Vis. 2010;10(14). pii: 40. doi: 10.1167/10.14.40 – reference: 8255708 - Percept Psychophys. 1993 Oct;54(4):457-68 |
SSID | ssj0000185 |
Score | 2.3254511 |
Snippet | The instructions subjects receive can have a large effect on experimentally measured color constancy, but the nature of these effects and how their existence... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 847 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Color Perception - physiology Female Humans Male Psychomotor Performance - physiology Young Adult |
Title | The nature of instructional effects in color constancy |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26727021 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTsMwELVYLr0g9h35wDWlWWzHR4RAFRKcWqm3ylsESKQ59ED5esZLlpZFwCWKbCVK_JzJG3vmDUKXiSloUkgawc-YRBlTLOIiJREVhMlUKKmco_jwSIfj7H5CJm1Ys8sumcu-ev8yr-Q_qEIb4GqzZP-AbHNTaIBzwBeOgDAcf42xV-b0yg-NGCyMex2o4eLMbRkN5ZmgWtrH7fDRJa3_qraLi35Y56-aCBivLdAmHLRbRXpWvjw7esp8sGTH27dZWp0w-pAUEdYbYtrGRfWNt5E8tRUUQvWVYESzpDNZuhYx94Kanyy1z_V_e6rc_oIvE9eBrHp1mCV2o3jgc6h_7l1Rza671tE6-A-2IKpdxWlkxXJSS9Wm7Kp9CCsNHS5ccTMc3Rhto62AC772oO-gNVPuol7zu1rsIQroY48-nhV4CX0c0IdW7NDHDfr7aHx3O7oZRqEKRiQI5fMoFsIYaigD5mUKQ6Q2rJCcaZIDXdRSS5EYBo8dK6mF4lZjcSBFrDMJZNDo5ABtlLPSHCGs8kJrLiU1sbR-tYx5MVCKGQ2skwt1jA79O08rL3UyrUfj5NueU9RrZ8kZ2izg2zLnQNTm8sKN-geqIEGB |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+nature+of+instructional+effects+in+color+constancy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+experimental+psychology.+Human+perception+and+performance&rft.au=Radonji%C4%87%2C+Ana&rft.au=Brainard%2C+David+H&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fxhp0000184&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26727021&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26727021&rft.externalDocID=26727021 |