Mapping depth-to-clay using fitted multiple depth response curves of a proximal EMI sensor

As an alternative for the depth response approximations based on the theoretical Maxwell's equations, a procedure was proposed to fit depth response curves for different coil configurations. A 39 ha study area was selected in the Belgian loess belt, where loess material was situated on a Tertia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeoderma Vol. 162; no. 1; pp. 151 - 158
Main Authors Saey, Timothy, Van Meirvenne, Marc, De Smedt, Philippe, Cockx, Liesbet, Meerschman, Eef, Islam, Mohammad Monirul, Meeuws, Fun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.04.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As an alternative for the depth response approximations based on the theoretical Maxwell's equations, a procedure was proposed to fit depth response curves for different coil configurations. A 39 ha study area was selected in the Belgian loess belt, where loess material was situated on a Tertiary substrate. A survey with the DUALEM-21S electromagnetic induction instrument was carried out to map the depth-to-clay ( z clay). The depth response curves were fitted both for the vertical and perpendicular coil configurations using 85 depth observations of z clay. The resulting depth response curves R( z clay) were: R p, s ( z clay ) = 0 .8135 ⋅ e -1 .4131 ⋅ z clay s for the perpendicular coil configuration (with s as the intercoil spacing) and R v, s ( z clay ) = 0 .9802 ⋅ e -0 .8102 ⋅ z clay s for the vertical coil configuration. A set of 4 equations based on the developed depth response functions was used to model z clay at each of the 209 400 measurement points. These z clay predictions were validated using geo-electrical imaging. With two multi-electrode resistivity arrays, z clay was 1D-inverted at 95 locations along two transects, assuming a two-layered soil system. A coefficient of determination of 0.95, with a root mean-squared estimation error of 0.22 m, was found between the predicted and 1D-inverted depths. This procedure allowed the accurate 3D-reconstruction of the paleolandscape before the deposition of the loess. Flow lines were modelled on this paleosurface, revealing past or subsurface stream patterns not visible on the present relief. ► A procedure was proposed to fit depth response curves for different coil configurations. ► A survey with the DUALEM-21S electromagnetic induction instrument was carried out to map the depth-to-clay. ► The depth-to-clay predictions were validated using geo-electrical imaging. ► This procedure allowed the accurate 3D-reconstruction of the paleolandscape.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-7061
1872-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.01.015