Mini suction cups and water-extraction effects on preferential solute transport
Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br-...
Saved in:
Published in | Vadose zone journal Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 866 - 880 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Madison
Soil Science Society of America
01.08.2005
Soil Science Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br-) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br- transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br- transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br- transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm3) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection-dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br- breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br- breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br- transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br- peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water‐extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br
−
) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25‐cm outer diameter and 1‐cm length could extract 1 cm
3
of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6‐cm diam., 2‐cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1‐cm
3
samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24‐cm diam., 80‐cm high) during a Br
−
transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br
−
transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br
−
transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm
3
) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three‐dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection–dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br
−
breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br
−
breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br
−
transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br
−
peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow. Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water- extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br super(-)) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm super(3) of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm super(3) samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br super(- ) transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br super(-) transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br super(-) transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm super(3)) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection-dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br super(-) breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br super(-) breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br super(-) transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br super(-) peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow. Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br⁻) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm³ of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm³ samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br⁻ transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br⁻ transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br⁻ transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm³) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection–dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br⁻ breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br⁻ breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br⁻ transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br⁻ peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow. Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br-) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br- transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br- transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br- transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm3) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection-dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br- breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br- breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br- transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br- peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow. Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water‐extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br−) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25‐cm outer diameter and 1‐cm length could extract 1 cm3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6‐cm diam., 2‐cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1‐cm3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24‐cm diam., 80‐cm high) during a Br− transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br− transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br− transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm3) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three‐dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection–dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br− breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br− breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br− transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br− peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow. |
Author | Köhne, J. Maximilian |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Kohne, J.M |
BookMark | eNp9kDtrHTEQhYVxwI-kS--tQiBZR6PHelUG47xwcGE7RRqh1R0ZXdbSRtL6xvn10WVvYQJxMcyg-c6Ic47IfogBCXkN9JQB7z48_FkzSsUpBYA9cgiSqxa6ju8_mQ_IUc5rSkEJwQ7J1XcffJNnW3wMjZ2n3JiwajamYGrxd0lm2aBzaEtu6jgldJgwFG_GJsdxLthULuQppvKSvHBmzPhq14_J7aeLm_Mv7eXV56_nHy9bIzoO7UpQyrgAilb2K-6cGpjsHErqrHCC9YhSWbBSSsulYYNlcmCDHCz2Z72g_Ji8Xe5OKf6aMRd977PFcTQB45w1qx-IHqTgFX3zLAodKNVxVUG2gDbFnKtLbX0xW_vVnh81UL2NWe9i1tuYq-j9P6Ip-XuTHv-HqwXf-BEfn2X1j5_f2Lbqw077btHeYczWY7C4iWlc6XWcU6hp64p2uhbrWaVPFtqZqM1d8lnfXjMKnAJlUp1R_hfXIqp7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_10099 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1745_6592_2008_00207_x crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2009_0127 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biteb_2022_101114 crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2005_0105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2014_08_088 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2009_07_048 crossref_primary_10_1002_jpln_200521955 crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2011_0017 |
Cites_doi | 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00387.x 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x 10.1016/S0169-7722(96)00032-0 10.1071/SR02142 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000060003x 10.1029/WR013i001p00203 10.1029/WR024i005p00755 10.1081/CSS-120000242 10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00114-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. Soil Science Society of America |
Copyright_xml | – notice: GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. – notice: Soil Science Society of America |
DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION 7QH 7TV 7UA C1K 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.2136/vzj2004.0111 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef Aqualine Pollution Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Pollution Abstracts Aqualine Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Pollution Abstracts AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1539-1663 |
EndPage | 880 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_2136_vzj2004_0111 VZJ2VZJ20040111 2006_006282 US201301025970 |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Science Foundation funderid: EAR 0296158 |
GroupedDBID | .~0 0R~ 123 18M 1OB 1OC 24P 2WC 6KN AAHHS ABJNI ACAWQ ACCFJ ACGFO ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADZMN AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AFRAH AIWBW AJBDE AKLNG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AVUZU BCNDV C1A CS3 DU5 E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD FBQ GOHGZ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 IAO IGS MV1 M~E NHAZY O9- OK1 P2P RAK RGW SAMSI TR2 WIN WOQ ~02 ~KM AAHBH AAWFE ALUQN DDYGU H13 ITC WXSBR ACCMX AAYXX CITATION 7QH 7TV 7UA AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY C1K 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a4631-d40023410ec58d3ff9b256fe50fc4f428ee59c1c555c35a2bc25b2b5bce878403 |
ISSN | 1539-1663 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 09:52:18 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 07:31:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:12:41 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:38:13 EST 2025 Tue Oct 29 04:43:06 EDT 2024 Wed Dec 27 19:09:28 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a4631-d40023410ec58d3ff9b256fe50fc4f428ee59c1c555c35a2bc25b2b5bce878403 |
Notes | http://vzj.scijournals.org/cgi/reprint/4/3/866 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 16199639 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2400481543 proquest_miscellaneous_16199639 crossref_citationtrail_10_2136_vzj2004_0111 crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2004_0111 wiley_primary_10_2136_vzj2004_0111_VZJ2VZJ20040111 geoscienceworld_journals_2006_006282 fao_agris_US201301025970 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | August 2005 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2005 text: August 2005 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Madison |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Madison |
PublicationTitle | Vadose zone journal |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Soil Science Society of America Soil Science Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Soil Science Society of America – name: Soil Science Society |
References | 2004; 42 1986; 50 2001 2000; 46 1997; 25 1980; 44 1988; 24 1995 1972 1977; 13 2001; 52 2001; 32 1999 e_1_2_7_5_1 Bear J. (e_1_2_7_4_1) 1972 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 Simunek J. (e_1_2_7_10_1) 1995 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 Dullien F.A.L. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 1972 Atkins P.W. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2001 Simunek J. (e_1_2_7_11_1) 1999 |
References_xml | – volume: 32 start-page: 1677 year: 2001 end-page: 1686 article-title: Sampling soil water in sandy soils: Comparative analysis of some common methods. (11–12) publication-title: Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. – volume: 50 start-page: 1384 year: 1986 end-page: 1390 article-title: Water and chloride movement through a layered field soil publication-title: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. – volume: 13 start-page: 203 year: 1977 end-page: 207 article-title: Soil water regimes near porous cup water samplers. (1) publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – volume: 44 start-page: 892 year: 1980 end-page: 898 article-title: A closed‐form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils publication-title: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. – volume: 42 start-page: 9 year: 2004 end-page: 16 article-title: Analysis of turbulent flow patterns of soil water under field conditions using Burgers equation and porous suction‐cup samplers publication-title: Aust. J. Soil Res. – volume: 46 start-page: 187 year: 2000 end-page: 204 article-title: Combining coring and suction cup data to improve the monitoring of pesticides in sandy vadose zones: A field‐release experiment publication-title: J. Contam. Hydrol. – volume: 52 start-page: 237 year: 2001 end-page: 252 article-title: Nitrate leaching loss under annual and perennial pastures with and without line on a duplex (texture contrast) soil in humid southeastern Australia publication-title: Eur. J. Soil Sci. – year: 2001 – year: 1972 – year: 1995 – volume: 24 start-page: 755 year: 1988 end-page: 769 article-title: Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – volume: 25 start-page: 199 year: 1997 end-page: 218 article-title: Effects of degree of water saturation on dispersivity and immobile water in sandy soil columns publication-title: J. Contam. Hydrol. – year: 1999 – volume-title: Physical chemistry year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 – volume-title: The HYDRUS‐2D software package for simulating two‐dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably‐saturated media, Version 2.0 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 – volume-title: Dynamics of fluids in porous materials year: 1972 ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00387.x – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(96)00032-0 – volume-title: The SWMS‐3D code for simulating water flow and solute transport in three‐dimensional variably‐saturated media, Version 1.0 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1071/SR02142 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000060003x – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1029/WR013i001p00203 – volume-title: Porous media: Fluid transport and pore structure year: 1972 ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1029/WR024i005p00755 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1081/CSS-120000242 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00114-5 |
SSID | ssj0019442 |
Score | 1.7469314 |
Snippet | Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley geoscienceworld fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 866 |
SubjectTerms | breakthrough curves bromide ion bromides bromine ceramics chemical dispersion chromatograms convection equations experimental studies halogens hydraulic conductivity ion chromatograms laboratory studies liquid chromatograms loam loam soils mathematical models measuring devices mini suction cups moisture movement porosity porous ceramic cups preferential flow Richards equation saturated conditions saturated flow simulation soil blocks soil transport processes soil water soils solute transport solutes TDR data three-dimensional models unsaturated zone vadose zone water water flow |
Title | Mini suction cups and water-extraction effects on preferential solute transport |
URI | https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/vzj/article/4/3/866/91824 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2136%2Fvzj2004.0111 https://www.proquest.com/docview/16199639 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2400481543 |
Volume | 4 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZoudBDxVMNzyCV0ypL4keyORZUVK20cKBbVVys2LHboGW32gegPfDbmYmdkF21qHDYKGtZ1sjzeTKf7Zkh5DBTtgSDaKMkY1nEc8uinJVxVCpKYyvAIy8wOHn0MT0Z8-G5OG9qtfvokqXq6_W1cSX_o1VoA71ilOw_aLYdFBrgHfQLT9AwPG-l41E1rXoLl_-1p1dXLt_yD3Af5xEY3bmvA97e2cDrWC6x7LKOE0HhDFaJcPnNu47qWVHiTfb1DJzQrixom_Fw_V166fZCh_3eqPhZfasmDdCaPQTR3mDze4izatLakua2KDrC7tBowzzmUZJ6k2SuafM2lXegwzr2cZCm3U-tK-K0bcWpKzPzff0Vld2PG3O8mRebuht5KXDGHXKXAktAMzf6ddweIuW8rp3UCujiHnD0t92xNzySHVvM9sj-hfGpRE2duHaDfnRJTO2FnN4n-54-hEcOCw_IHTN9SPaOLuY-hYp5RD4hKkKPihBREQIqwm1UhB4VIbx2URE6VIQtKh6T8Yfj0_cnkS-bERU8ZUlUcnTEeBIbLQYlszZX4NdaI2KruQW6aYzIdaKFEJqJgipNhaJKKG0GGfB99oTsTgFdByQUvMxguWptWM4t5UqkyHgZLXiR2yQPSK-ZOql9TnksbTKRwC1xoqWfaIkTHZA3be8rl0vlhn4HoAVZwNwt5PgzxcN18IOB-sYBOdxSjfRrYCE7gAjIq0ZfEswlnoEVUzNbLSQQHGD4DCR_fUMPyl0OJc4CQmtV_1VYefZlSPGHn0P4__R2Ej4j9_4sxOdkdzlfmRfg3i7VyxrEvwFf0aPM |
linkProvider | ISSN International Centre |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4VOLQcUJ8ifeFK9FSlTfzYkOMKgbaURa0gFHGxYsdGIJRFm92q6qk_ob-xv6QzsVlBJXroIVIi2ZE14_F8Y4-_AdgsjG9wQfRpXogilaUXaSmaLG0M55lXiMhrupw8PhiMKrl3ok5inVO6CxP4IRYbbmQZ_XpNBk4b0n3ucihD8u3HBan4PVVLX4IVAjY4rVeGx9VptThIKGVfPwftukxz9K4h953-8OFm_1teacnXk1VYO3ORTtL15KW3IOhNINt7ot2HsBYhJBsGnT-Ce659DKvDs2mk0XBP4Mv4vD1nh4EZlm3PrzpWtw37isBy-vvnr53vs2m40MACe3HH8PVzLDmCNn_J-u0yxxbc50-h2t052h6lsXhCWsuByNNGkjuWeeas2mqE96VBdOOdyryVHoMO51Rpc6uUskLV3FiuDDfKWLdVYNQnnsFyO2ndOjAlmwKVZq0TpfRcGjWguEfwWtalz8sE3l0LT9vILE4FLi41Rhgkah1FrUnUCbxdtL4KjBp3tFtHPegapdfp6pDTESuiIQyAsgQ2_1KOjpbXUVlNStQbYCiZwMa1xjQaDZ2E1K2bzDuNMBfjPIEjf3NHCy4Dk44UCfBe2f8crD4-3eP00KKI38__p9MG3B8djff1_seDTy_gQU8S26cavoTl2XTuXiH8mZnXcYr_AXn1--E |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fSxwxEB_qCaU-SP_itramYJ_Ktrv5c2seD-uhtorFrhVfQjabiCJ7x-2diE_9CP2M_SSdbOKhBX3ow8IuJEuYyWR-k0x-A7BeVK7GBdGlecGKlEvHUsnqLK0rSjMnEJFrfzl5b7-_XfLdY3EcN9z8XZjADzHfcPOW0a3X3sDHtetSl0MVksvrc6_hT75Y-gIsCnRMWQ8WB0flSTk_R5C8K5-DZi3THJ1rSH33f_h8u_8dp7Tg9GgJlk9tZJO0HXfpHQR6G8d2jmj4FJYjgiSDoPJn8Mg2z2FpcDqJLBr2BXzfO2vOyGEghiWbs3FLdFOTn4grJ39-_d66mk7CfQYSyItbgq8HseIImvwF6XbLLJlTn7-Ecrj1Y3M7jbUTUs37LE9r7r0xzzNrxEbNnJMVghtnReYMdxhzWCukyY0QwjChaWWoqGglKmM3Cgz62CvoNaPGrgARvC5QZ8ZYJrmjvBJ9H_YwqrmWLpcJfLwRnjKRWNzXt7hQGGB4UasoauVFncCHeetxINS4p90K6kFplF6rykPqT1gRDGH8kyWw_o9yVDS81lfV9Hl6fYwkE1i70ZhCm_EHIbqxo1mrEOVimMdw5O_vaUF5INLhLAHaKfvBwaqjk13qH78m4vfr_-m0Bo8PvgzVt539r2_gSUcR2yUarkJvOpnZtwh-ptW7OMP_Aszo-wE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mini+suction+cups+and+water-extraction+effects+on+preferential+solute+transport&rft.jtitle=Vadose+zone+journal&rft.au=K%C3%B6hne%2C+J.+Maximilian&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.pub=Soil+Science+Society+of+America&rft.issn=1539-1663&rft.eissn=1539-1663&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=880&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136%2Fvzj2004.0111&rft.externalDocID=2006_006282 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1539-1663&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1539-1663&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1539-1663&client=summon |