Mini suction cups and water-extraction effects on preferential solute transport

Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVadose zone journal Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 866 - 880
Main Author Kohne, J.M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison Soil Science Society of America 01.08.2005
Soil Science Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br-) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br- transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br- transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br- transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm3) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection-dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br- breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br- breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br- transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br- peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow.
AbstractList Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water‐extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br − ) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25‐cm outer diameter and 1‐cm length could extract 1 cm 3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6‐cm diam., 2‐cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1‐cm 3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24‐cm diam., 80‐cm high) during a Br − transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br − transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br − transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm 3 ) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three‐dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection–dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br − breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br − breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br − transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br − peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow.
Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water- extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br super(-)) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm super(3) of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm super(3) samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br super(- ) transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br super(-) transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br super(-) transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm super(3)) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection-dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br super(-) breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br super(-) breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br super(-) transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br super(-) peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow.
Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br⁻) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm³ of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm³ samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br⁻ transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br⁻ transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br⁻ transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm³) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection–dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br⁻ breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br⁻ breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br⁻ transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br⁻ peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow.
Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water-extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br-) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25-cm outer diameter and 1-cm length could extract 1 cm3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6-cm diam., 2-cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1-cm3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24-cm diam., 80-cm high) during a Br- transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br- transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br- transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm3) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three-dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection-dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br- breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br- breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br- transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br- peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow.
Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study was to test mini suction cups, and to assess the effects of pore water‐extraction rate and cup size on preferential water flow and bromide (Br−) breakthrough. Porous ceramic cups of 0.25‐cm outer diameter and 1‐cm length could extract 1 cm3 of pore water within 17 (34, 38) min from 100% (85%, 70%) saturated loam soil by applying 0.1 (0.3, 0.5) bar suction. The corresponding sampling times for larger cups (0.6‐cm diam., 2‐cm length) were 3.3, 4.6, and 5.7 min. The smaller cups were subsequently tested for solution extraction of 1‐cm3 samples every 20 min out of the matrix and preferential flow path (PFP) of a large soil column (24‐cm diam., 80‐cm high) during a Br− transport experiment. Numerical simulations were used (i) to describe the Br− transport experiment and (ii) to evaluate how preferential Br− transport would be affected by pore solution extraction at different locations in the matrix and the PFP of a loam soil block (20 by 20 by 20 cm3) subject to wet and dry initial conditions. Three‐dimensional water flow and solute transport were simulated using the Richards and convection–dispersion equations. The experimental and simulation results revealed a dilemma: while fast solution extraction using larger cups altered the flow field and preferential Br− breakthrough for wet and particularly for dry initial conditions, slower solution extraction using small cups caused negligible perturbation of the flow field, but yielded insufficient resolution of the preferential Br− breakthrough. Sampling in the matrix did not considerably affect Br− transport, and gave sufficient resolution of the matrix Br− peak. This study showed that the use of suction cups for measuring solute transport may be problematic in case of preferential flow.
Author Köhne, J. Maximilian
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Kohne, J.M
BookMark eNp9kDtrHTEQhYVxwI-kS--tQiBZR6PHelUG47xwcGE7RRqh1R0ZXdbSRtL6xvn10WVvYQJxMcyg-c6Ic47IfogBCXkN9JQB7z48_FkzSsUpBYA9cgiSqxa6ju8_mQ_IUc5rSkEJwQ7J1XcffJNnW3wMjZ2n3JiwajamYGrxd0lm2aBzaEtu6jgldJgwFG_GJsdxLthULuQppvKSvHBmzPhq14_J7aeLm_Mv7eXV56_nHy9bIzoO7UpQyrgAilb2K-6cGpjsHErqrHCC9YhSWbBSSsulYYNlcmCDHCz2Z72g_Ji8Xe5OKf6aMRd977PFcTQB45w1qx-IHqTgFX3zLAodKNVxVUG2gDbFnKtLbX0xW_vVnh81UL2NWe9i1tuYq-j9P6Ip-XuTHv-HqwXf-BEfn2X1j5_f2Lbqw077btHeYczWY7C4iWlc6XWcU6hp64p2uhbrWaVPFtqZqM1d8lnfXjMKnAJlUp1R_hfXIqp7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_10099
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1745_6592_2008_00207_x
crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2009_0127
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biteb_2022_101114
crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2005_0105
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2014_08_088
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2009_07_048
crossref_primary_10_1002_jpln_200521955
crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2011_0017
Cites_doi 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00387.x
10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
10.1016/S0169-7722(96)00032-0
10.1071/SR02142
10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000060003x
10.1029/WR013i001p00203
10.1029/WR024i005p00755
10.1081/CSS-120000242
10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00114-5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute.
Soil Science Society of America
Copyright_xml – notice: GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute.
– notice: Soil Science Society of America
DBID FBQ
AAYXX
CITATION
7QH
7TV
7UA
C1K
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.2136/vzj2004.0111
DatabaseName AGRIS
CrossRef
Aqualine
Pollution Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Pollution Abstracts
Aqualine
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
Pollution Abstracts
AGRICOLA



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1539-1663
EndPage 880
ExternalDocumentID 10_2136_vzj2004_0111
VZJ2VZJ20040111
2006_006282
US201301025970
Genre article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Science Foundation
  funderid: EAR 0296158
GroupedDBID .~0
0R~
123
18M
1OB
1OC
24P
2WC
6KN
AAHHS
ABJNI
ACAWQ
ACCFJ
ACGFO
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADKYN
ADZMN
AEEZP
AENEX
AEQDE
AFRAH
AIWBW
AJBDE
AKLNG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AVUZU
BCNDV
C1A
CS3
DU5
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
FBQ
GOHGZ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
IAO
IGS
MV1
M~E
NHAZY
O9-
OK1
P2P
RAK
RGW
SAMSI
TR2
WIN
WOQ
~02
~KM
AAHBH
AAWFE
ALUQN
DDYGU
H13
ITC
WXSBR
ACCMX
AAYXX
CITATION
7QH
7TV
7UA
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a4631-d40023410ec58d3ff9b256fe50fc4f428ee59c1c555c35a2bc25b2b5bce878403
ISSN 1539-1663
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 09:52:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 07:31:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:50 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:12:41 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:38:13 EST 2025
Tue Oct 29 04:43:06 EDT 2024
Wed Dec 27 19:09:28 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a4631-d40023410ec58d3ff9b256fe50fc4f428ee59c1c555c35a2bc25b2b5bce878403
Notes http://vzj.scijournals.org/cgi/reprint/4/3/866
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 16199639
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2400481543
proquest_miscellaneous_16199639
crossref_citationtrail_10_2136_vzj2004_0111
crossref_primary_10_2136_vzj2004_0111
wiley_primary_10_2136_vzj2004_0111_VZJ2VZJ20040111
geoscienceworld_journals_2006_006282
fao_agris_US201301025970
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2005
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2005
  text: August 2005
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Madison
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Madison
PublicationTitle Vadose zone journal
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Soil Science Society of America
Soil Science Society
Publisher_xml – name: Soil Science Society of America
– name: Soil Science Society
References 2004; 42
1986; 50
2001
2000; 46
1997; 25
1980; 44
1988; 24
1995
1972
1977; 13
2001; 52
2001; 32
1999
e_1_2_7_5_1
Bear J. (e_1_2_7_4_1) 1972
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
Simunek J. (e_1_2_7_10_1) 1995
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
Dullien F.A.L. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 1972
Atkins P.W. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2001
Simunek J. (e_1_2_7_11_1) 1999
References_xml – volume: 32
  start-page: 1677
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1686
  article-title: Sampling soil water in sandy soils: Comparative analysis of some common methods. (11–12)
  publication-title: Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1384
  year: 1986
  end-page: 1390
  article-title: Water and chloride movement through a layered field soil
  publication-title: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 203
  year: 1977
  end-page: 207
  article-title: Soil water regimes near porous cup water samplers. (1)
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 892
  year: 1980
  end-page: 898
  article-title: A closed‐form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils
  publication-title: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
– volume: 42
  start-page: 9
  year: 2004
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Analysis of turbulent flow patterns of soil water under field conditions using Burgers equation and porous suction‐cup samplers
  publication-title: Aust. J. Soil Res.
– volume: 46
  start-page: 187
  year: 2000
  end-page: 204
  article-title: Combining coring and suction cup data to improve the monitoring of pesticides in sandy vadose zones: A field‐release experiment
  publication-title: J. Contam. Hydrol.
– volume: 52
  start-page: 237
  year: 2001
  end-page: 252
  article-title: Nitrate leaching loss under annual and perennial pastures with and without line on a duplex (texture contrast) soil in humid southeastern Australia
  publication-title: Eur. J. Soil Sci.
– year: 2001
– year: 1972
– year: 1995
– volume: 24
  start-page: 755
  year: 1988
  end-page: 769
  article-title: Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 199
  year: 1997
  end-page: 218
  article-title: Effects of degree of water saturation on dispersivity and immobile water in sandy soil columns
  publication-title: J. Contam. Hydrol.
– year: 1999
– volume-title: Physical chemistry
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
– volume-title: The HYDRUS‐2D software package for simulating two‐dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably‐saturated media, Version 2.0
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
– volume-title: Dynamics of fluids in porous materials
  year: 1972
  ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00387.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(96)00032-0
– volume-title: The SWMS‐3D code for simulating water flow and solute transport in three‐dimensional variably‐saturated media, Version 1.0
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1071/SR02142
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000060003x
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1029/WR013i001p00203
– volume-title: Porous media: Fluid transport and pore structure
  year: 1972
  ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1029/WR024i005p00755
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1081/CSS-120000242
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00114-5
SSID ssj0019442
Score 1.7469314
Snippet Soil water suction cups used in laboratory solute transport studies may cause undesired perturbations of the flow field. The twofold objective of this study...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
geoscienceworld
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 866
SubjectTerms breakthrough curves
bromide ion
bromides
bromine
ceramics
chemical dispersion
chromatograms
convection
equations
experimental studies
halogens
hydraulic conductivity
ion chromatograms
laboratory studies
liquid chromatograms
loam
loam soils
mathematical models
measuring devices
mini suction cups
moisture
movement
porosity
porous ceramic cups
preferential flow
Richards equation
saturated conditions
saturated flow
simulation
soil blocks
soil transport processes
soil water
soils
solute transport
solutes
TDR data
three-dimensional models
unsaturated zone
vadose zone
water
water flow
Title Mini suction cups and water-extraction effects on preferential solute transport
URI https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/vzj/article/4/3/866/91824
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2136%2Fvzj2004.0111
https://www.proquest.com/docview/16199639
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2400481543
Volume 4
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZoudBDxVMNzyCV0ypL4keyORZUVK20cKBbVVys2LHboGW32gegPfDbmYmdkF21qHDYKGtZ1sjzeTKf7Zkh5DBTtgSDaKMkY1nEc8uinJVxVCpKYyvAIy8wOHn0MT0Z8-G5OG9qtfvokqXq6_W1cSX_o1VoA71ilOw_aLYdFBrgHfQLT9AwPG-l41E1rXoLl_-1p1dXLt_yD3Af5xEY3bmvA97e2cDrWC6x7LKOE0HhDFaJcPnNu47qWVHiTfb1DJzQrixom_Fw_V166fZCh_3eqPhZfasmDdCaPQTR3mDze4izatLakua2KDrC7tBowzzmUZJ6k2SuafM2lXegwzr2cZCm3U-tK-K0bcWpKzPzff0Vld2PG3O8mRebuht5KXDGHXKXAktAMzf6ddweIuW8rp3UCujiHnD0t92xNzySHVvM9sj-hfGpRE2duHaDfnRJTO2FnN4n-54-hEcOCw_IHTN9SPaOLuY-hYp5RD4hKkKPihBREQIqwm1UhB4VIbx2URE6VIQtKh6T8Yfj0_cnkS-bERU8ZUlUcnTEeBIbLQYlszZX4NdaI2KruQW6aYzIdaKFEJqJgipNhaJKKG0GGfB99oTsTgFdByQUvMxguWptWM4t5UqkyHgZLXiR2yQPSK-ZOql9TnksbTKRwC1xoqWfaIkTHZA3be8rl0vlhn4HoAVZwNwt5PgzxcN18IOB-sYBOdxSjfRrYCE7gAjIq0ZfEswlnoEVUzNbLSQQHGD4DCR_fUMPyl0OJc4CQmtV_1VYefZlSPGHn0P4__R2Ej4j9_4sxOdkdzlfmRfg3i7VyxrEvwFf0aPM
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB4VOLQcUJ8ifeFK9FSlTfzYkOMKgbaURa0gFHGxYsdGIJRFm92q6qk_ob-xv6QzsVlBJXroIVIi2ZE14_F8Y4-_AdgsjG9wQfRpXogilaUXaSmaLG0M55lXiMhrupw8PhiMKrl3ok5inVO6CxP4IRYbbmQZ_XpNBk4b0n3ucihD8u3HBan4PVVLX4IVAjY4rVeGx9VptThIKGVfPwftukxz9K4h953-8OFm_1teacnXk1VYO3ORTtL15KW3IOhNINt7ot2HsBYhJBsGnT-Ce659DKvDs2mk0XBP4Mv4vD1nh4EZlm3PrzpWtw37isBy-vvnr53vs2m40MACe3HH8PVzLDmCNn_J-u0yxxbc50-h2t052h6lsXhCWsuByNNGkjuWeeas2mqE96VBdOOdyryVHoMO51Rpc6uUskLV3FiuDDfKWLdVYNQnnsFyO2ndOjAlmwKVZq0TpfRcGjWguEfwWtalz8sE3l0LT9vILE4FLi41Rhgkah1FrUnUCbxdtL4KjBp3tFtHPegapdfp6pDTESuiIQyAsgQ2_1KOjpbXUVlNStQbYCiZwMa1xjQaDZ2E1K2bzDuNMBfjPIEjf3NHCy4Dk44UCfBe2f8crD4-3eP00KKI38__p9MG3B8djff1_seDTy_gQU8S26cavoTl2XTuXiH8mZnXcYr_AXn1--E
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fSxwxEB_qCaU-SP_itramYJ_Ktrv5c2seD-uhtorFrhVfQjabiCJ7x-2diE_9CP2M_SSdbOKhBX3ow8IuJEuYyWR-k0x-A7BeVK7GBdGlecGKlEvHUsnqLK0rSjMnEJFrfzl5b7-_XfLdY3EcN9z8XZjADzHfcPOW0a3X3sDHtetSl0MVksvrc6_hT75Y-gIsCnRMWQ8WB0flSTk_R5C8K5-DZi3THJ1rSH33f_h8u_8dp7Tg9GgJlk9tZJO0HXfpHQR6G8d2jmj4FJYjgiSDoPJn8Mg2z2FpcDqJLBr2BXzfO2vOyGEghiWbs3FLdFOTn4grJ39-_d66mk7CfQYSyItbgq8HseIImvwF6XbLLJlTn7-Ecrj1Y3M7jbUTUs37LE9r7r0xzzNrxEbNnJMVghtnReYMdxhzWCukyY0QwjChaWWoqGglKmM3Cgz62CvoNaPGrgARvC5QZ8ZYJrmjvBJ9H_YwqrmWLpcJfLwRnjKRWNzXt7hQGGB4UasoauVFncCHeetxINS4p90K6kFplF6rykPqT1gRDGH8kyWw_o9yVDS81lfV9Hl6fYwkE1i70ZhCm_EHIbqxo1mrEOVimMdw5O_vaUF5INLhLAHaKfvBwaqjk13qH78m4vfr_-m0Bo8PvgzVt539r2_gSUcR2yUarkJvOpnZtwh-ptW7OMP_Aszo-wE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mini+suction+cups+and+water-extraction+effects+on+preferential+solute+transport&rft.jtitle=Vadose+zone+journal&rft.au=K%C3%B6hne%2C+J.+Maximilian&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.pub=Soil+Science+Society+of+America&rft.issn=1539-1663&rft.eissn=1539-1663&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=880&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136%2Fvzj2004.0111&rft.externalDocID=2006_006282
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1539-1663&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1539-1663&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1539-1663&client=summon