Blinded evaluation of airborne methane source detection using Bridger Photonics LiDAR

• Published in: Remote sensing of environment Vol. 259; p. 112418
• Main Authors: Johnson, Matthew R., Tyner, David R., Szekeres, Alexander J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Elsevier Inc 15.06.2021; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Airborne sensing; Data processing; Emissions; Fugitive emissions; Inventory; LDAR; Leak detection; Lidar; Lidar measurements; Linear functions; Methane; Methane sources; Mitigation; Oil and gas; Onsite; Photonics; Polls & surveys; Pollution abatement; Regulatory policy; Sensitivity; Technology; Uncertainty; Venting; Vents; Wind measurement; Wind speed; Methane; Mitigation; Venting; LDAR; Oil and gas; Regulatory policy; Inventory; Fugitive emissions
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112418
• ISSN: 0034-4257

Controlled, fully-blinded methane releases and ancillary on-site wind measurements were performed during a separate airborne survey of active oil and gas facilities to quantitatively evaluate the capabilities and potential utility of the Bridger Photonics LiDAR-based airborne Gas Mapping LiDAR™ (GML) methane measurement technology under realistic field conditions. Importantly, although Bridger Photonics knew there was a ground team working in the area to deploy wind sensors as part of the broader survey of facilities, they had no knowledge whatsoever that controlled releases were taking place and were not informed of this until all data processing was complete. Thus, the presented data allow a true, fully-blinded assessment of the airborne technology's ability to both detect and locate unknown methane sources within active oil and gas facilities, as well as to quantify their release rates. Results were used to derive a lower-sensitivity limit threshold as a function of wind speed, which matches well with the broader field survey results. Comparison of measurement results with and without the benefit of on-site wind data reveal that uncertainty in the GML source quantification is a direct linear function of the uncertainty in the wind speed. Quantification uncertainties (1σ) of ±31–68% can be expected for sources near the sensitivity limit. The derived sensitivity limit function was incorporated into exploratory simulations using the Fugitive Emissions Abatement Simulation Toolkit (FEAST), which suggest that the Bridger GML technology has comparable performance to optical gas imaging (OGI) camera surveys both in terms of fraction of total emissions detected and anticipated net mitigation. The relative performance of the Bridger GML technology would be expected to improve or worsen as the assumed underlying distribution of source magnitudes becomes more or less positively skewed (i.e. more or less dominated by larger sources such as tank vents). Overall, the Bridger GML technology is shown to be capable of detecting, locating, and quantifying individual sources at or below the magnitudes of recent regulated venting limits. The presented detection sensitivity function will be useful for modelling potential alternate leak detection and repair strategies and interpreting future airborne measurement data. [Display omitted] •Quantitative in-field assessment of Bridger Photonics Gas Mapping LiDAR™ technology.•Fully-blinded controlled methane releases within active oil and gas facilities.•True test of ability to detect, locate, and quantify unknown sources.•Derived lower sensitivity limit is a linear function of windspeed; modelled in FEAST.•Sensitivity reaches new regulated vent limits; approaches OGI camera effectiveness.