Palaeoproterozoic high-pressure granulite overprint of the Archean continental crust: evidence for homogeneous crustal thickening (Man Rise, Ivory Coast)
The character of mountain building processes in Palaeoproterozoic times is subject to much debate. Based on the discovery of high‐pressure granulites in the Man Rise (Côte d’Ivoire), several authors have argued that Eburnean (Palaeoproterozoic) reworking of the Archean basement was achieved by moder...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of metamorphic geology Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 41 - 58 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.01.2010
Wiley-Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The character of mountain building processes in Palaeoproterozoic times is subject to much debate. Based on the discovery of high‐pressure granulites in the Man Rise (Côte d’Ivoire), several authors have argued that Eburnean (Palaeoproterozoic) reworking of the Archean basement was achieved by modern‐style thrust‐dominated tectonics.
A mafic granulite of the Kouibli area (Archean part of the Man Rise, western Ivory Coast) displays a primary assemblage (M1) containing garnet, diopsidic clinopyroxene, red‐brown pargasitic amphibole, plagioclase (andesine), rutile, ilmenite and quartz. This assemblage is associated with a subvertical regional foliation. Symplectites that developed at the expense of the M1 assemblage contain orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, plagioclase (bytownite), green pargasitic amphibole, ilmenite and magnetite (M2). Multiequilibrium thermobarometric calculations and P–T pseudosections calculated with thermocalc suggest granulite facies conditions of ∼ 13 kbar, 850 °C and <7 kbar, 700–800 °C for M1 and M2, respectively. In agreement with the qualitative information obtained from reaction textures and chemical zoning of minerals, this suggests an evolution dominated by decompression accompanied by moderate cooling. A Sm–Nd garnet – whole‐rock age of 2.03 Ga determined on this sample indicates that this evolution occurred during the Palaeoproterozoic. It is argued that from the geodynamic point of view the observed features are best explained by homogeneous thickening of the margin of the Archean craton, re‐heated and softened due to the accretion of hot, juvenile Palaeoproterozoic crust, as well as coeval intrusion of juvenile magmas. Crustal shortening was mainly accommodated by transpressive shear zones and by lateral crustal spreading rather than large‐scale thrust systems. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:4021B0F5A9F1BAEBF78BF32F9DBBA3A4C55A0CEC ark:/67375/WNG-LJZ9QXND-H ArticleID:JMG852 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0263-4929 1525-1314 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2009.00852.x |