Bioavailability of Antibiotics at Soil–Water Interfaces: A Comparison of Measured Activities and Equilibrium Partitioning Estimates
There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological...
Saved in:
Published in | Environmental science & technology Vol. 52; no. 11; pp. 6555 - 6564 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
05.06.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil–water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil–water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors. |
---|---|
AbstractList | There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil-water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil-water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil-water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil-water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors. There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil–water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil–water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors. There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil–water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC₅₀ (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil–water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors. There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil-water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil-water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors. |
Author | Müller, Julia Olsson, Oliver Kümmerer, Klaus Menz, Jakob |
AuthorAffiliation | PGS Toxicology and Environmental Protection Leuphana University Lüneburg University of Leipzig Sustainable Chemistry and Material Resources, Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Sustainable Chemistry and Material Resources, Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry – name: PGS Toxicology and Environmental Protection – name: Leuphana University Lüneburg – name: University of Leipzig |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jakob orcidid: 0000-0001-6519-4270 surname: Menz fullname: Menz, Jakob organization: University of Leipzig – sequence: 2 givenname: Julia surname: Müller fullname: Müller, Julia organization: Leuphana University Lüneburg – sequence: 3 givenname: Oliver surname: Olsson fullname: Olsson, Oliver organization: Leuphana University Lüneburg – sequence: 4 givenname: Klaus surname: Kümmerer fullname: Kümmerer, Klaus email: Klaus.Kuemmerer@uni.leuphana.de organization: Leuphana University Lüneburg |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkUFrFDEUx4NU7LZ69iYBL4LM9iWZyWS8bZdVCxUFFb0NbzIZSZlNtkmm0JsXP4Hf0E9iht16KBS8JIH3-_9f3vufkCPnnSHkOYMlA87OUMeliWlZdyAFbx6RBas4FJWq2BFZADBRNEJ-PyYnMV4BABegnpBj3sj8EGJBfp1bjzdoR-zsaNMt9QNduWQ765PVkWKin70d__z8_Q2TCfTC5XNAbeIbuqJrv91hsNG7WffBYJyC6elKJ3tjkzVZ73q6uZ6ydxfstKWfMKRc8c66H3QTk91m2_iUPB5wjObZ4T4lX99uvqzfF5cf312sV5cFloKlIs_WiY7xvuFNI3HQgLVmvWQGOqZEyVEagXXZgFA11lhWgL2UWvWoyk4O4pS82vvugr-e8uLarY3ajCM646fYclAl1CCk-g-Ui1qUijUZfXkPvfJTcHmQTNWiggaUzNSLAzV1W9O3u5BnD7ftXRYZqPaADj7GYIZW24TzrlLIAbUM2jnzNmfezk0OmWfd2T3dnfXDitd7xVz499eH6L_-lsAY |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2021_112070 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_electacta_2024_145561 crossref_primary_10_3390_toxics11070570 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2025_125703 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e16052 crossref_primary_10_4491_eer_2024_062 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2024_125306 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2021_107047 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2025_120954 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2020_109333 crossref_primary_10_1080_21655979_2022_2108564 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_138367 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_09_147 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_9b05104 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23115937 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jece_2021_105868 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2020_122363 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_023_29317_8 crossref_primary_10_1039_D4EM00777H crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eti_2023_103266 crossref_primary_10_1080_15320383_2020_1722983 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2019_120807 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_146912 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics10091066 crossref_primary_10_2166_wh_2023_051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2023_132313 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2022_134921 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2023_132279 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_142370 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsestengg_3c00605 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_analchem_8b05265 crossref_primary_10_1039_D1EM00405K crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_153518 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mimet_2019_105724 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_6552 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00359-X 10.1002/jpln.200390023 10.1007/BF01812361 10.2134/jeq2005.0017 10.1021/es5003428 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086 10.1065/jss2007.02.210 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.02.003 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.091 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.062 10.1128/AEM.05352-11 10.1021/es00032a011 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.001 10.1211/0022357022179 10.1007/s002849900296 10.1128/AAC.7.6.836 10.2134/jeq2011.0459 10.1021/es040548w 10.1021/es0003021 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3502-3508.2002 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.028 10.1289/ehp.1104650 10.1128/aem.49.1.28-32.1985 10.1039/C7EM00034K 10.1002/jps.2600670810 10.1289/ehp.1206446 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00614-6 10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02033-X 10.1038/srep14701 10.1002/jps.2600511202 10.2134/jeq2015.07.0393 10.1002/etc.5620101203 10.1021/acs.est.7b00590 10.1065/jss2006.10.188 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.017 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.009 10.1093/jac/dkh325 10.1128/AAC.40.10.2288 10.1021/jf960215l 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.117 10.1186/1752-153X-8-5 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01728 10.1002/etc.2513 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00442-7 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.013 10.1126/science.1159483 10.1897/05-229R.1 10.1007/s11783-015-0801-2 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 5, 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 5, 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QO 7ST 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.7b06329 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Engineering Research Database Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Biotechnology Research Abstracts AGRICOLA PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1520-5851 |
EndPage | 6564 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29630833 10_1021_acs_est_7b06329 a383591885 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - .K2 1AW 3R3 4R4 53G 55A 5GY 5VS 63O 7~N 85S AABXI ABFLS ABMVS ABOGM ABPPZ ABPTK ABUCX ABUFD ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACJ ACPRK ACS AEESW AENEX AFEFF AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQSVZ BAANH BKOMP CS3 DZ EBS ED ED~ EJD F5P GNL IH9 JG JG~ K2 LG6 MS PQEST PQQKQ ROL RXW TN5 TWZ U5U UHB UI2 UKR UPT VF5 VG9 VQA W1F WH7 X XFK XZL YZZ --- -DZ -~X ..I .DC 4.4 6TJ AAHBH AAYXX ABBLG ABJNI ABLBI ABQRX ADHLV ADUKH AGXLV AHGAQ CITATION CUPRZ GGK MS~ MW2 XSW ZCA NPM YIN 7QO 7ST 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-152b3b12d92996afc0a7c1d61e0b18342a6e3a7490387a7a450ad66c8da84b6f3 |
IEDL.DBID | ACS |
ISSN | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 23:36:23 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:00:23 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 11:25:15 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:35:15 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:57:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:57 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 27 13:42:43 EDT 2020 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a431t-152b3b12d92996afc0a7c1d61e0b18342a6e3a7490387a7a450ad66c8da84b6f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6519-4270 |
PMID | 29630833 |
PQID | 2073509086 |
PQPubID | 45412 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2084070368 proquest_miscellaneous_2023734819 proquest_journals_2073509086 pubmed_primary_29630833 crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acs_est_7b06329 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b06329 acs_journals_10_1021_acs_est_7b06329 |
ProviderPackageCode | JG~ 55A AABXI GNL VF5 7~N ACJ VG9 W1F ACS AEESW AFEFF .K2 ABMVS ABUCX IH9 BAANH AQSVZ ED~ UI2 CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-06-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-06-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2018 text: 2018-06-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Easton |
PublicationTitle | Environmental science & technology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Environ. Sci. Technol |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | American Chemical Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Chemical Society |
References | ref9/cit9 ref45/cit45 ECETOC (ref60/cit60) 2013 ref3/cit3 ref27/cit27 European Chemicals Agency (ref37/cit37) 2016 Kumar K. (ref1/cit1) 2005 ref56/cit56 European Medicines Agency (ref61/cit61) 2008 ref16/cit16 ref59/cit59 ref2/cit2 ref34/cit34 Gould W. D. (ref54/cit54) 1985; 49 ref20/cit20 ref48/cit48 ref17/cit17 ref10/cit10 ref53/cit53 ref19/cit19 ref21/cit21 ref42/cit42 ref46/cit46 Köhler T. (ref52/cit52) 1996; 40 ref13/cit13 ref24/cit24 ref38/cit38 ref50/cit50 ref6/cit6 ref36/cit36 ref18/cit18 International Organization for Standardization (ref8/cit8) 2015 ref11/cit11 ref25/cit25 ref29/cit29 Krüger W. (ref23/cit23) 1961; 4 ref32/cit32 ref39/cit39 ref14/cit14 ref57/cit57 ref5/cit5 ref51/cit51 ref43/cit43 ref28/cit28 ref40/cit40 International Organization for Standardization (ref31/cit31) 1999 European Commission (ref12/cit12) 2003 ref26/cit26 ref55/cit55 US EPA (ref35/cit35) 2012 ref15/cit15 ref41/cit41 ref58/cit58 ref22/cit22 ref33/cit33 ref4/cit4 ref30/cit30 ref47/cit47 ref44/cit44 Boxall A. B. A. (ref49/cit49) 2006 ref7/cit7 |
References_xml | – ident: ref11/cit11 doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00359-X – volume-title: Estimation Programs Interface Suite for Microsoft Windows v 4.11 year: 2012 ident: ref35/cit35 – ident: ref48/cit48 doi: 10.1002/jpln.200390023 – ident: ref58/cit58 doi: 10.1007/BF01812361 – ident: ref26/cit26 doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0017 – volume-title: Water quality - Determination of turbidity year: 1999 ident: ref31/cit31 – ident: ref20/cit20 doi: 10.1021/es5003428 – ident: ref16/cit16 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086 – ident: ref44/cit44 – volume-title: Soil quality – Vocabulary year: 2015 ident: ref8/cit8 – ident: ref50/cit50 doi: 10.1065/jss2007.02.210 – ident: ref51/cit51 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.02.003 – volume-title: Revised Guideline on Environmental Impact Assessment for Veterinary Medicinal Products in support of the VICH guidelines GL6 and GL38 year: 2008 ident: ref61/cit61 – ident: ref30/cit30 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.091 – ident: ref13/cit13 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.062 – ident: ref25/cit25 doi: 10.1128/AEM.05352-11 – ident: ref34/cit34 doi: 10.1021/es00032a011 – ident: ref5/cit5 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 – ident: ref57/cit57 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.001 – ident: ref38/cit38 doi: 10.1211/0022357022179 – ident: ref21/cit21 doi: 10.1007/s002849900296 – volume: 4 start-page: 171 issue: 2 year: 1961 ident: ref23/cit23 publication-title: S. African J. Agr. Sci. – ident: ref53/cit53 doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.6.836 – ident: ref24/cit24 doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0459 – ident: ref9/cit9 doi: 10.1021/es040548w – volume-title: How to use and report (Q)SARs. Version 3.1 year: 2016 ident: ref37/cit37 – ident: ref42/cit42 – ident: ref59/cit59 doi: 10.1021/es0003021 – ident: ref22/cit22 doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3502-3508.2002 – ident: ref39/cit39 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.028 – ident: ref4/cit4 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104650 – volume: 49 start-page: 28 issue: 1 year: 1985 ident: ref54/cit54 publication-title: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.1.28-32.1985 – ident: ref36/cit36 doi: 10.1039/C7EM00034K – ident: ref41/cit41 doi: 10.1002/jps.2600670810 – ident: ref3/cit3 doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206446 – ident: ref45/cit45 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00614-6 – ident: ref18/cit18 doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02033-X – ident: ref33/cit33 doi: 10.1038/srep14701 – volume-title: Environmental risk assessment of ionisable compounds year: 2013 ident: ref60/cit60 – ident: ref40/cit40 doi: 10.1002/jps.2600511202 – ident: ref14/cit14 doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.07.0393 – volume-title: Targeted monitoring study for veterinary medicines in the environment year: 2006 ident: ref49/cit49 – ident: ref10/cit10 doi: 10.1002/etc.5620101203 – ident: ref27/cit27 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00590 – ident: ref32/cit32 doi: 10.1065/jss2006.10.188 – ident: ref43/cit43 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.017 – ident: ref56/cit56 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.009 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Advances in Agronomy year: 2005 ident: ref1/cit1 – ident: ref6/cit6 doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh325 – volume: 40 start-page: 2288 issue: 10 year: 1996 ident: ref52/cit52 publication-title: Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.10.2288 – ident: ref46/cit46 doi: 10.1021/jf960215l – ident: ref29/cit29 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.117 – ident: ref19/cit19 doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-5 – ident: ref7/cit7 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01728 – volume-title: Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances part II. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and of directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Part II Environmental risk assessment year: 2003 ident: ref12/cit12 – ident: ref28/cit28 doi: 10.1002/etc.2513 – ident: ref47/cit47 doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00442-7 – ident: ref55/cit55 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.013 – ident: ref2/cit2 doi: 10.1126/science.1159483 – ident: ref17/cit17 doi: 10.1897/05-229R.1 – ident: ref15/cit15 doi: 10.1007/s11783-015-0801-2 |
SSID | ssj0002308 |
Score | 2.4374335 |
Snippet | There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref acs |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 6555 |
SubjectTerms | antibacterial properties antibiotic residues Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics Bacteria Bioassays Bioavailability Chemical partition ecotoxicology Environmental impact Experimental design Gram-negative bacteria Interfaces median effective concentration Microbiota Moisture content Mud-water interfaces Partitioning Pollution prediction Propagation Risk assessment Soil testing Soil water Soils Toxicity testing uncertainty Water pollution |
Title | Bioavailability of Antibiotics at Soil–Water Interfaces: A Comparison of Measured Activities and Equilibrium Partitioning Estimates |
URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06329 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630833 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2073509086 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2023734819 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2084070368 |
Volume | 52 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3NbtQwELagXOBQoFC6UJCReuCSkNiO43BbVltVSEVIpWJvkf8irdgm0CRIcOLCE_CGPAkzSTYLVAtcEzuynPn5xp75hpAjVSSKGy6Cwvg0EMzxwDjhAxkp4xUTRnksFD59LU_OxatFstiQRf95g8_i59rWIRjIMDXgTVl2ndxgElQYUdDsbDS6gKTVullBxuViZPG58gF0Q7b-3Q1twZadjzm-3Wdn1R01IaaWvA_bxoT2y1Xixn8v_w7ZHZAmnfaicZdc8-UeufUL_-Ae2Z9vytxg6KDn9T3y7eWy0p_0ctWzeH-mVUGnJZaXVEjrTHVDz6rl6sfX7-8Aq17S7lyxwOyuF3RKZ2NvQ5x32p9COjq1XacKCM2pLh2df2yXXcFBe0HfoAAPR8N0DlbnAiHwfXJ-PH87OwmGhg2BBhzSBIAFDDcxc4C5MqkLG-nUxk7GPjJgOgTT0nOdigzvzHWqRRJpJ6VVTithZMH3yU5Zlf6AUGdS6WNr08h7IZ2BQCvViXE6kY5zZibkCHY2HxSuzru7dBbn-BC2Ox-2e0LC9W_O7UB6jr03VtsnPBsnfOj5PrYPPVzLzWYdDEwmYDAIFCfk6fgaVBbvYXTpqxbHMI6kQnH2tzEQeSM5mpqQB71MjuthYDQBOfOH_7cHj8hNQHmqy29LDslOc9n6x4CkGvOk06Gf5kMcdQ |
linkProvider | American Chemical Society |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB6VcgAOPAqFhQJG6oFLtontOF5uYbXVAt0K1FbsLbJjR1qxTaBJkODEhV_AP-SXME6yWR5aBNfEtiaT8cznx3wDsC-zUDLNuJdpG3mcGuZpw60nfKmtpFxL6xKFZ8diesZfzsP5FvirXBgUosSRyuYQf80uEBy4Z-gnh5HGoEpHl-AyQhHqbDoen_S-FwG1XNUsGDEx78l8_hjARaO0_DUabYCYTag5vAFveiGbGybvhnWlh-nn3_gb_-crbsL1DneSuDWUW7Bl8x249hMb4Q7sTtZJb9i0m_Xlbfj6fFGoj2qxbDm9P5EiI3Hukk0KR_JMVEVOisXy-5dvbxG5XpBmlzFzd72ekZiM-0qHrt-s3ZM0JE6buhW4UCcqN2TyoV406Qf1OXntzLnbKCYT9EHnDhDfgbPDyel46nXlGzyFqKTyEBlopgNqEIGNhMpSX0VpYERgfY2OhFMlLFMRH7kTdBUpHvrKCJFKoyTXImO7sJ0Xub0HxOhI2CBNI99aLozGZVekQm1UKAxjVA9gHzWbdNOvTJqTdRok7iGqO-nUPYDh6m8naUeB7ipxLDd3eNp3eN-yf2xuurcyn7UcFB0oIjJcNg7gSf8aJ7A7lVG5LWrXhjJHMRSM_tYG1-GOKk0O4G5rmr08FF0o4mh2_9908BiuTE9nR8nRi-NXD-Aq4j_Z3HwL92C7uqjtQ8RYlX7UTKsf0kgk1g |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSAgOPAqFhQJG6oFLlsR2HIdbWHZVHq0qlRV7i-zYkVZsk9IkSHDiwi_gH_JLmEmyKQ8tgmtiW85kZvzZ4_mGkD2Vh4obLrzcuMgTzHLPWOE86SvjFBNGOUwUPjiU-3PxahEu-qQwzIWBSVQwUtUG8dGqT23eMwwET_E5-MpxZGBhZfFFcgmDdqjXyeR48L8AqtW6bkHM5WIg9PljAFyRsurXFWkDzGyXm9l1Mh8m2t4yeT9uajPOPv_G4fi_X3KDXOvxJ006hblJLrhim1z9iZVwm-xMz5PfoGlv_dUt8vX5stQf9XLVcXt_omVOkwKTTkoke6a6psflcvX9y7d3gGDPaHvamOOdr2c0oZOh4iH2O-jOJi1NsrZ-BWzYqS4snX5olm0aQnNCj1Ct-wNjOgVfdILA-DaZz6ZvJ_teX8bB04BOag8QguEmYBaQWCx1nvk6ygIrA-cbcCiCaem4jkSMkXQdaRH62kqZKauVMDLnO2SrKAt3l1BrIumCLIt854S0BrZfkQ6N1aG0nDMzInsg2bQ3wyptI-wsSPEhiDvtxT0i4_UfT7OeCh0rcqw2d3gydDjtWEA2N91dq9D5PBg4UkBmsH0ckcfDazBkjM7owpUNtmEcqYaC-G9tYD-OlGlqRO506jnMh4ErBTzN7_2bDB6Ry0cvZumbl4ev75MrAANVewEu3CVb9VnjHgDUqs3D1rJ-ABupJ1k |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioavailability+of+Antibiotics+at+Soil-Water+Interfaces%3A+A+Comparison+of+Measured+Activities+and+Equilibrium+Partitioning+Estimates&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=Menz%2C+Jakob&rft.au=M%C3%BCller%2C+Julia&rft.au=Olsson%2C+Oliver&rft.au=K%C3%BCmmerer%2C+Klaus&rft.date=2018-06-05&rft.issn=1520-5851&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Facs.est.7b06329&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |