Bioavailability of Antibiotics at Soil–Water Interfaces: A Comparison of Measured Activities and Equilibrium Partitioning Estimates

There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental science & technology Vol. 52; no. 11; pp. 6555 - 6564
Main Authors Menz, Jakob, Müller, Julia, Olsson, Oliver, Kümmerer, Klaus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 05.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil–water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil–water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.
AbstractList There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil-water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil-water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil-water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil-water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.
There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil–water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil–water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.
There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil–water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC₅₀ (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil–water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.
There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the prediction or analytical determination of bioavailable concentrations of antibiotics in soil is still subject to great uncertainty. Biological assays are increasingly recognized as valuable complementary tools that allow a more direct determination of the residual antibiotic activity. This study assessed the bioavailability of structurally diverse antibiotics at a soil-water interface applying activity-based analyses in conjunction with equilibrium partitioning (EqP) modeling. The activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria of nine antibiotics from different classes was determined in the presence and absence of standard soil (LUFA St. 2.2). The addition of soil affected the activity of different antibiotics to highly varying degrees. Moreover, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the experimentally observed and the EqP-derived log EC (half-maximal effective concentration) values was observed. The innovative experimental design of this study provided new insights on the bioavailability of antibiotics at soil-water interfaces. EqP appears to be applicable to a broad range of antibiotics for the purpose of screening-level risk assessment. However, EqP estimates cannot replace soil-specific ecotoxicity testing in higher-tier assessments, since their accuracy is still compromised by a number of factors.
Author Müller, Julia
Olsson, Oliver
Kümmerer, Klaus
Menz, Jakob
AuthorAffiliation PGS Toxicology and Environmental Protection
Leuphana University Lüneburg
University of Leipzig
Sustainable Chemistry and Material Resources, Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Sustainable Chemistry and Material Resources, Institute of Sustainable and Environmental Chemistry
– name: PGS Toxicology and Environmental Protection
– name: Leuphana University Lüneburg
– name: University of Leipzig
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jakob
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6519-4270
  surname: Menz
  fullname: Menz, Jakob
  organization: University of Leipzig
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Julia
  surname: Müller
  fullname: Müller, Julia
  organization: Leuphana University Lüneburg
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Oliver
  surname: Olsson
  fullname: Olsson, Oliver
  organization: Leuphana University Lüneburg
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Klaus
  surname: Kümmerer
  fullname: Kümmerer, Klaus
  email: Klaus.Kuemmerer@uni.leuphana.de
  organization: Leuphana University Lüneburg
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkUFrFDEUx4NU7LZ69iYBL4LM9iWZyWS8bZdVCxUFFb0NbzIZSZlNtkmm0JsXP4Hf0E9iht16KBS8JIH3-_9f3vufkCPnnSHkOYMlA87OUMeliWlZdyAFbx6RBas4FJWq2BFZADBRNEJ-PyYnMV4BABegnpBj3sj8EGJBfp1bjzdoR-zsaNMt9QNduWQ765PVkWKin70d__z8_Q2TCfTC5XNAbeIbuqJrv91hsNG7WffBYJyC6elKJ3tjkzVZ73q6uZ6ydxfstKWfMKRc8c66H3QTk91m2_iUPB5wjObZ4T4lX99uvqzfF5cf312sV5cFloKlIs_WiY7xvuFNI3HQgLVmvWQGOqZEyVEagXXZgFA11lhWgL2UWvWoyk4O4pS82vvugr-e8uLarY3ajCM646fYclAl1CCk-g-Ui1qUijUZfXkPvfJTcHmQTNWiggaUzNSLAzV1W9O3u5BnD7ftXRYZqPaADj7GYIZW24TzrlLIAbUM2jnzNmfezk0OmWfd2T3dnfXDitd7xVz499eH6L_-lsAY
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2021_112070
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_electacta_2024_145561
crossref_primary_10_3390_toxics11070570
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2025_125703
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e16052
crossref_primary_10_4491_eer_2024_062
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2024_125306
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2021_107047
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2025_120954
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2020_109333
crossref_primary_10_1080_21655979_2022_2108564
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_138367
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_09_147
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_9b05104
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23115937
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jece_2021_105868
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2020_122363
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_023_29317_8
crossref_primary_10_1039_D4EM00777H
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eti_2023_103266
crossref_primary_10_1080_15320383_2020_1722983
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2019_120807
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_146912
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics10091066
crossref_primary_10_2166_wh_2023_051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2023_132313
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2022_134921
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2023_132279
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_142370
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsestengg_3c00605
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_analchem_8b05265
crossref_primary_10_1039_D1EM00405K
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_153518
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mimet_2019_105724
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_6552
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00359-X
10.1002/jpln.200390023
10.1007/BF01812361
10.2134/jeq2005.0017
10.1021/es5003428
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086
10.1065/jss2007.02.210
10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.02.003
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.091
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.062
10.1128/AEM.05352-11
10.1021/es00032a011
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026
10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.001
10.1211/0022357022179
10.1007/s002849900296
10.1128/AAC.7.6.836
10.2134/jeq2011.0459
10.1021/es040548w
10.1021/es0003021
10.1128/AEM.68.7.3502-3508.2002
10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.028
10.1289/ehp.1104650
10.1128/aem.49.1.28-32.1985
10.1039/C7EM00034K
10.1002/jps.2600670810
10.1289/ehp.1206446
10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00614-6
10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02033-X
10.1038/srep14701
10.1002/jps.2600511202
10.2134/jeq2015.07.0393
10.1002/etc.5620101203
10.1021/acs.est.7b00590
10.1065/jss2006.10.188
10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.017
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.009
10.1093/jac/dkh325
10.1128/AAC.40.10.2288
10.1021/jf960215l
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.117
10.1186/1752-153X-8-5
10.3389/fmicb.2016.01728
10.1002/etc.2513
10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00442-7
10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.013
10.1126/science.1159483
10.1897/05-229R.1
10.1007/s11783-015-0801-2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 5, 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 5, 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QO
7ST
7T7
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b06329
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Toxicology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
AGRICOLA

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1520-5851
EndPage 6564
ExternalDocumentID 29630833
10_1021_acs_est_7b06329
a383591885
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID -
.K2
1AW
3R3
4R4
53G
55A
5GY
5VS
63O
7~N
85S
AABXI
ABFLS
ABMVS
ABOGM
ABPPZ
ABPTK
ABUCX
ABUFD
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACJ
ACPRK
ACS
AEESW
AENEX
AFEFF
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQSVZ
BAANH
BKOMP
CS3
DZ
EBS
ED
ED~
EJD
F5P
GNL
IH9
JG
JG~
K2
LG6
MS
PQEST
PQQKQ
ROL
RXW
TN5
TWZ
U5U
UHB
UI2
UKR
UPT
VF5
VG9
VQA
W1F
WH7
X
XFK
XZL
YZZ
---
-DZ
-~X
..I
.DC
4.4
6TJ
AAHBH
AAYXX
ABBLG
ABJNI
ABLBI
ABQRX
ADHLV
ADUKH
AGXLV
AHGAQ
CITATION
CUPRZ
GGK
MS~
MW2
XSW
ZCA
NPM
YIN
7QO
7ST
7T7
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7X8
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-152b3b12d92996afc0a7c1d61e0b18342a6e3a7490387a7a450ad66c8da84b6f3
IEDL.DBID ACS
ISSN 0013-936X
1520-5851
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 23:36:23 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:00:23 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 11:25:15 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:35:15 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:57:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:57 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 27 13:42:43 EDT 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a431t-152b3b12d92996afc0a7c1d61e0b18342a6e3a7490387a7a450ad66c8da84b6f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6519-4270
PMID 29630833
PQID 2073509086
PQPubID 45412
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2084070368
proquest_miscellaneous_2023734819
proquest_journals_2073509086
pubmed_primary_29630833
crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acs_est_7b06329
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b06329
acs_journals_10_1021_acs_est_7b06329
ProviderPackageCode JG~
55A
AABXI
GNL
VF5
7~N
ACJ
VG9
W1F
ACS
AEESW
AFEFF
.K2
ABMVS
ABUCX
IH9
BAANH
AQSVZ
ED~
UI2
CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-06-05
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-06-05
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-06-05
  day: 05
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Easton
PublicationTitle Environmental science & technology
PublicationTitleAlternate Environ. Sci. Technol
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher American Chemical Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Chemical Society
References ref9/cit9
ref45/cit45
ECETOC (ref60/cit60) 2013
ref3/cit3
ref27/cit27
European Chemicals Agency (ref37/cit37) 2016
Kumar K. (ref1/cit1) 2005
ref56/cit56
European Medicines Agency (ref61/cit61) 2008
ref16/cit16
ref59/cit59
ref2/cit2
ref34/cit34
Gould W. D. (ref54/cit54) 1985; 49
ref20/cit20
ref48/cit48
ref17/cit17
ref10/cit10
ref53/cit53
ref19/cit19
ref21/cit21
ref42/cit42
ref46/cit46
Köhler T. (ref52/cit52) 1996; 40
ref13/cit13
ref24/cit24
ref38/cit38
ref50/cit50
ref6/cit6
ref36/cit36
ref18/cit18
International Organization for Standardization (ref8/cit8) 2015
ref11/cit11
ref25/cit25
ref29/cit29
Krüger W. (ref23/cit23) 1961; 4
ref32/cit32
ref39/cit39
ref14/cit14
ref57/cit57
ref5/cit5
ref51/cit51
ref43/cit43
ref28/cit28
ref40/cit40
International Organization for Standardization (ref31/cit31) 1999
European Commission (ref12/cit12) 2003
ref26/cit26
ref55/cit55
US EPA (ref35/cit35) 2012
ref15/cit15
ref41/cit41
ref58/cit58
ref22/cit22
ref33/cit33
ref4/cit4
ref30/cit30
ref47/cit47
ref44/cit44
Boxall A. B. A. (ref49/cit49) 2006
ref7/cit7
References_xml – ident: ref11/cit11
  doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00359-X
– volume-title: Estimation Programs Interface Suite for Microsoft Windows v 4.11
  year: 2012
  ident: ref35/cit35
– ident: ref48/cit48
  doi: 10.1002/jpln.200390023
– ident: ref58/cit58
  doi: 10.1007/BF01812361
– ident: ref26/cit26
  doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0017
– volume-title: Water quality - Determination of turbidity
  year: 1999
  ident: ref31/cit31
– ident: ref20/cit20
  doi: 10.1021/es5003428
– ident: ref16/cit16
  doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086
– ident: ref44/cit44
– volume-title: Soil quality – Vocabulary
  year: 2015
  ident: ref8/cit8
– ident: ref50/cit50
  doi: 10.1065/jss2007.02.210
– ident: ref51/cit51
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.02.003
– volume-title: Revised Guideline on Environmental Impact Assessment for Veterinary Medicinal Products in support of the VICH guidelines GL6 and GL38
  year: 2008
  ident: ref61/cit61
– ident: ref30/cit30
  doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.091
– ident: ref13/cit13
  doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.062
– ident: ref25/cit25
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.05352-11
– ident: ref34/cit34
  doi: 10.1021/es00032a011
– ident: ref5/cit5
  doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026
– ident: ref57/cit57
  doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.001
– ident: ref38/cit38
  doi: 10.1211/0022357022179
– ident: ref21/cit21
  doi: 10.1007/s002849900296
– volume: 4
  start-page: 171
  issue: 2
  year: 1961
  ident: ref23/cit23
  publication-title: S. African J. Agr. Sci.
– ident: ref53/cit53
  doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.6.836
– ident: ref24/cit24
  doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0459
– ident: ref9/cit9
  doi: 10.1021/es040548w
– volume-title: How to use and report (Q)SARs. Version 3.1
  year: 2016
  ident: ref37/cit37
– ident: ref42/cit42
– ident: ref59/cit59
  doi: 10.1021/es0003021
– ident: ref22/cit22
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3502-3508.2002
– ident: ref39/cit39
  doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.028
– ident: ref4/cit4
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104650
– volume: 49
  start-page: 28
  issue: 1
  year: 1985
  ident: ref54/cit54
  publication-title: Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
  doi: 10.1128/aem.49.1.28-32.1985
– ident: ref36/cit36
  doi: 10.1039/C7EM00034K
– ident: ref41/cit41
  doi: 10.1002/jps.2600670810
– ident: ref3/cit3
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206446
– ident: ref45/cit45
  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00614-6
– ident: ref18/cit18
  doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02033-X
– ident: ref33/cit33
  doi: 10.1038/srep14701
– volume-title: Environmental risk assessment of ionisable compounds
  year: 2013
  ident: ref60/cit60
– ident: ref40/cit40
  doi: 10.1002/jps.2600511202
– ident: ref14/cit14
  doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.07.0393
– volume-title: Targeted monitoring study for veterinary medicines in the environment
  year: 2006
  ident: ref49/cit49
– ident: ref10/cit10
  doi: 10.1002/etc.5620101203
– ident: ref27/cit27
  doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00590
– ident: ref32/cit32
  doi: 10.1065/jss2006.10.188
– ident: ref43/cit43
  doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.017
– ident: ref56/cit56
  doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.009
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Advances in Agronomy
  year: 2005
  ident: ref1/cit1
– ident: ref6/cit6
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh325
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2288
  issue: 10
  year: 1996
  ident: ref52/cit52
  publication-title: Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
  doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.10.2288
– ident: ref46/cit46
  doi: 10.1021/jf960215l
– ident: ref29/cit29
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.117
– ident: ref19/cit19
  doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-5
– ident: ref7/cit7
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01728
– volume-title: Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances part II. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and of directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Part II Environmental risk assessment
  year: 2003
  ident: ref12/cit12
– ident: ref28/cit28
  doi: 10.1002/etc.2513
– ident: ref47/cit47
  doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00442-7
– ident: ref55/cit55
  doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.013
– ident: ref2/cit2
  doi: 10.1126/science.1159483
– ident: ref17/cit17
  doi: 10.1897/05-229R.1
– ident: ref15/cit15
  doi: 10.1007/s11783-015-0801-2
SSID ssj0002308
Score 2.4374335
Snippet There are growing concerns that antibiotic pollution impacts environmental microbiota and facilitates the propagation of antibiotic resistance. However, the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
acs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 6555
SubjectTerms antibacterial properties
antibiotic residues
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Bacteria
Bioassays
Bioavailability
Chemical partition
ecotoxicology
Environmental impact
Experimental design
Gram-negative bacteria
Interfaces
median effective concentration
Microbiota
Moisture content
Mud-water interfaces
Partitioning
Pollution
prediction
Propagation
Risk assessment
Soil testing
Soil water
Soils
Toxicity testing
uncertainty
Water pollution
Title Bioavailability of Antibiotics at Soil–Water Interfaces: A Comparison of Measured Activities and Equilibrium Partitioning Estimates
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06329
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630833
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2073509086
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2023734819
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2084070368
Volume 52
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3NbtQwELagXOBQoFC6UJCReuCSkNiO43BbVltVSEVIpWJvkf8irdgm0CRIcOLCE_CGPAkzSTYLVAtcEzuynPn5xp75hpAjVSSKGy6Cwvg0EMzxwDjhAxkp4xUTRnksFD59LU_OxatFstiQRf95g8_i59rWIRjIMDXgTVl2ndxgElQYUdDsbDS6gKTVullBxuViZPG58gF0Q7b-3Q1twZadjzm-3Wdn1R01IaaWvA_bxoT2y1Xixn8v_w7ZHZAmnfaicZdc8-UeufUL_-Ae2Z9vytxg6KDn9T3y7eWy0p_0ctWzeH-mVUGnJZaXVEjrTHVDz6rl6sfX7-8Aq17S7lyxwOyuF3RKZ2NvQ5x32p9COjq1XacKCM2pLh2df2yXXcFBe0HfoAAPR8N0DlbnAiHwfXJ-PH87OwmGhg2BBhzSBIAFDDcxc4C5MqkLG-nUxk7GPjJgOgTT0nOdigzvzHWqRRJpJ6VVTithZMH3yU5Zlf6AUGdS6WNr08h7IZ2BQCvViXE6kY5zZibkCHY2HxSuzru7dBbn-BC2Ox-2e0LC9W_O7UB6jr03VtsnPBsnfOj5PrYPPVzLzWYdDEwmYDAIFCfk6fgaVBbvYXTpqxbHMI6kQnH2tzEQeSM5mpqQB71MjuthYDQBOfOH_7cHj8hNQHmqy29LDslOc9n6x4CkGvOk06Gf5kMcdQ
linkProvider American Chemical Society
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB6VcgAOPAqFhQJG6oFLtontOF5uYbXVAt0K1FbsLbJjR1qxTaBJkODEhV_AP-SXME6yWR5aBNfEtiaT8cznx3wDsC-zUDLNuJdpG3mcGuZpw60nfKmtpFxL6xKFZ8diesZfzsP5FvirXBgUosSRyuYQf80uEBy4Z-gnh5HGoEpHl-AyQhHqbDoen_S-FwG1XNUsGDEx78l8_hjARaO0_DUabYCYTag5vAFveiGbGybvhnWlh-nn3_gb_-crbsL1DneSuDWUW7Bl8x249hMb4Q7sTtZJb9i0m_Xlbfj6fFGoj2qxbDm9P5EiI3Hukk0KR_JMVEVOisXy-5dvbxG5XpBmlzFzd72ekZiM-0qHrt-s3ZM0JE6buhW4UCcqN2TyoV406Qf1OXntzLnbKCYT9EHnDhDfgbPDyel46nXlGzyFqKTyEBlopgNqEIGNhMpSX0VpYERgfY2OhFMlLFMRH7kTdBUpHvrKCJFKoyTXImO7sJ0Xub0HxOhI2CBNI99aLozGZVekQm1UKAxjVA9gHzWbdNOvTJqTdRok7iGqO-nUPYDh6m8naUeB7ipxLDd3eNp3eN-yf2xuurcyn7UcFB0oIjJcNg7gSf8aJ7A7lVG5LWrXhjJHMRSM_tYG1-GOKk0O4G5rmr08FF0o4mh2_9908BiuTE9nR8nRi-NXD-Aq4j_Z3HwL92C7uqjtQ8RYlX7UTKsf0kgk1g
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSAgOPAqFhQJG6oFLlsR2HIdbWHZVHq0qlRV7i-zYkVZsk9IkSHDiwi_gH_JLmEmyKQ8tgmtiW85kZvzZ4_mGkD2Vh4obLrzcuMgTzHLPWOE86SvjFBNGOUwUPjiU-3PxahEu-qQwzIWBSVQwUtUG8dGqT23eMwwET_E5-MpxZGBhZfFFcgmDdqjXyeR48L8AqtW6bkHM5WIg9PljAFyRsurXFWkDzGyXm9l1Mh8m2t4yeT9uajPOPv_G4fi_X3KDXOvxJ006hblJLrhim1z9iZVwm-xMz5PfoGlv_dUt8vX5stQf9XLVcXt_omVOkwKTTkoke6a6psflcvX9y7d3gGDPaHvamOOdr2c0oZOh4iH2O-jOJi1NsrZ-BWzYqS4snX5olm0aQnNCj1Ct-wNjOgVfdILA-DaZz6ZvJ_teX8bB04BOag8QguEmYBaQWCx1nvk6ygIrA-cbcCiCaem4jkSMkXQdaRH62kqZKauVMDLnO2SrKAt3l1BrIumCLIt854S0BrZfkQ6N1aG0nDMzInsg2bQ3wyptI-wsSPEhiDvtxT0i4_UfT7OeCh0rcqw2d3gydDjtWEA2N91dq9D5PBg4UkBmsH0ckcfDazBkjM7owpUNtmEcqYaC-G9tYD-OlGlqRO506jnMh4ErBTzN7_2bDB6Ry0cvZumbl4ev75MrAANVewEu3CVb9VnjHgDUqs3D1rJ-ABupJ1k
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioavailability+of+Antibiotics+at+Soil-Water+Interfaces%3A+A+Comparison+of+Measured+Activities+and+Equilibrium+Partitioning+Estimates&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=Menz%2C+Jakob&rft.au=M%C3%BCller%2C+Julia&rft.au=Olsson%2C+Oliver&rft.au=K%C3%BCmmerer%2C+Klaus&rft.date=2018-06-05&rft.issn=1520-5851&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Facs.est.7b06329&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon