Clinical and Analytical Evaluation of the Alinity m HR HPV Assay within the VALGENT-3 Framework

Only clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) tests should be used in cervical cancer screening. VALGENT provides a framework to validate new HPV tests. Only clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) tests should be used in cervical cancer screening. VALGENT provides a framework to vali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical microbiology Vol. 59; no. 6
Main Authors Dhillon, Sharonjit K., Oštrbenk Valenčak, Anja, Xu, Lan, Poljak, Mario, Arbyn, Marc
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Microbiology 19.05.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Only clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) tests should be used in cervical cancer screening. VALGENT provides a framework to validate new HPV tests. Only clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) tests should be used in cervical cancer screening. VALGENT provides a framework to validate new HPV tests. In the VALGENT-3 study, the clinical accuracy of the recently launched Abbott Alinity m HR HPV assay (Alinity m) to detect cervical precancerous lesions was assessed against the standard comparator test (Hybrid Capture 2; HC2) and against two previously validated alternative comparator tests (Abbott RealTi m e HR HPV and Roche cobas 4800 assays). Validation was conducted using 1,300 consecutive cervical samples from women attending an organized population-based cervical screening program enriched with 300 cytologically abnormal samples. Overall high-risk HPV test concordance was assessed by kappa values; the concordance for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was assessed for Alinity m, RealTi m e, and cobas, and the Linear Array (Roche) was used for more detailed genotyping concordance. In the total study population, the relative sensitivity and specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and CIN3+ of Alinity m compared to HC2 was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.06) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.06), respectively. The relative specificity for nondiseased subjects (≤CIN1) was 1.01 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02) (all p non-inferiority ≤ 0.001). Alinity m showed noninferior clinical accuracy among women 30 years or older when cobas or RealTi m e was used as a comparator. HPV genotype-specific concordance between Alinity m and the three comparator tests showed excellent agreement, with kappa values ranging from 0.82 to 1.00. In conclusion, Alinity m fulfills the international accuracy requirements for use in cervical cancer screening and shows excellent HPV genotype-specific concordance with three clinically validated HPV tests.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Sharonjit K. Dhillon and Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined by drawing straws.
Citation Dhillon SK, Oštrbenk Valenčak A, Xu L, Poljak M, Arbyn M. 2021. Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Alinity m HR HPV assay within the VALGENT-3 framework. J Clin Microbiol 59:e00286-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00286-21.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/JCM.00286-21