Reversible Solid-State Phase Transitions between Au–P Complexes Accompanied by Switchable Fluorescence

Six complexes {(3-bdppmapy)­(AuCl)2} n (1–6; 3-bdppmapy = N,N′-bis­(diphenylphosphanylmethyl)-3-aminopyridine and tht = tetrahydrothiophene) were simultaneously formed by the reaction of Au­(tht)Cl and 3-bdppmapy in CH2Cl2 followed by infusion with hexane. Complexes 4–6 could be produced independent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInorganic chemistry Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 3072 - 3078
Main Authors Jiang, Meng-Sha, Tao, Yan-Hui, Wang, Yu-Wei, Lu, Chengrong, Young, David James, Lang, Jian-Ping, Ren, Zhi-Gang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 02.03.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Six complexes {(3-bdppmapy)­(AuCl)2} n (1–6; 3-bdppmapy = N,N′-bis­(diphenylphosphanylmethyl)-3-aminopyridine and tht = tetrahydrothiophene) were simultaneously formed by the reaction of Au­(tht)Cl and 3-bdppmapy in CH2Cl2 followed by infusion with hexane. Complexes 4–6 could be produced independently by volatilizing solvent in air, solid-state heating, or solvothermal reaction. The PPh2–Au–Cl moieties extended in different directions, forming Au–Au and Au–Au–Au interactions. Complex 4 could be converted to 5 by heating to 130 °C, with the cleavage of one Au–Au bond, while 5 reverted back to 4 upon exposure to CH2Cl2 vapor over 11 h. This solid-state phase transition could be recycled and was accompanied by a change in solid-state fluorescence, without obvious intensity decay over five cycles. The reason for both the phase transition and difference in photoluminescence is related to the different numbers and strengths of aurophilic interactions in each complex that could be modeled by density functional theory calculations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03412