Sensory and Analytical Evaluations of Paints With and Without Texanol

Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory he...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental science & technology Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 243 - 248
Main Authors Gallagher, Michelle, Dalton, Pamela, Sitvarin, Laura, Preti, George
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 01.01.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the “persistent, characteristic odor” of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naïve (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjectsʼ prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.
AbstractList Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which maytrigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.
Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3- pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.
Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which maytrigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which maytrigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.
Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the “persistent, characteristic odor” of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naïve (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjectsʼ prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.
Author Sitvarin, Laura
Gallagher, Michelle
Dalton, Pamela
Preti, George
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michelle
  surname: Gallagher
  fullname: Gallagher, Michelle
  email: mgallagher@monell.org.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pamela
  surname: Dalton
  fullname: Dalton, Pamela
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Laura
  surname: Sitvarin
  fullname: Sitvarin, Laura
– sequence: 4
  givenname: George
  surname: Preti
  fullname: Preti, George
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19972766$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18350903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0U1vEzEQBmALFdG0cOAPoL2AxGHp2K6_jqUKX6ogqEHlZs06XuGytYvtRc2_Z9uEVEKVONmHZ16N5j0gezFFT8hzCm8oMHrkCygqhFg_IjMqGLRCC7pHZgCUt4bL7_vkoJRLAGAc9BOyTzUXYIDPyPzcx5LyusG4ak4iDusaHA7N_DcOI9aQYmlS3ywwxFqai1B_3MnbTxprs_Q3GNPwlDzucSj-2fY9JN_ezZenH9qzL-8_np6ctXhMWW0VUKql6RzrhFPKdSAEeuBaHXvTGcPATQtyoHIlJTMr5fquNwxpryWXTPFD8mqTe53Tr9GXaq9CcX4YMPo0Fis1aK0Y_BcyEJJrrSf4YgvH7sqv7HUOV5jX9u-FJvByC7BMh-kzRhfKvTNGMSXl5I42zuVUSva9daHeHbBmDIOlYG-7sruuponX_0zsQh-w7caGUv3NDmL-aaXiStjl4txeLN8u2Oevn6y-3xpdsZdpzFOz5YHcPwq0rLc
CODEN ESTHAG
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2016_03_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_porgcoat_2017_09_012
crossref_primary_10_1039_C4SM02215G
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chroma_2008_09_073
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2018_00350
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0003591
crossref_primary_10_3390_su132212802
crossref_primary_10_1039_C7AY02885G
crossref_primary_10_1080_02652030802562920
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_buildenv_2010_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_chemse_bjr015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11998_022_00741_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2024_123067
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_talanta_2019_120301
Cites_doi 10.1021/jf00016a026
10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.00003.x
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.057
10.1093/chemse/18.6.683
10.5271/sjweh.2100
10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00008.x
10.1093/chemse/23.3.309
10.1152/japplphysiol.00399.2003
10.1002/ajim.10102
10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010003178.x
10.1007/BF02698028
10.1289/ehp.9192147
10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-3-00004.x
10.1007/BF02696151
10.1021/jf021069o
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society
2008 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society
– notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TV
C1K
7X8
DOI 10.1021/es071555y
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Pollution Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Pollution Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Pollution Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Applied Sciences
EISSN 1520-5851
EndPage 248
ExternalDocumentID 18350903
19972766
10_1021_es071555y
ark_67375_TPS_WTBP2NQJ_8
c180813914
Genre Clinical Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID -
.K2
186
1AW
3R3
4.4
4R4
53G
55A
5GY
5VS
63O
7~N
85S
A
AABXI
ABFLS
ABMVS
ABOGM
ABPPZ
ABPTK
ABUCX
ABUFD
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACJ
ACPRK
ACS
AEESW
AENEX
AFEFF
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ANTXH
AQSVZ
BAANH
BKOMP
CS3
DZ
EBS
ED
ED~
EJD
F5P
GNL
IH9
JG
JG~
K2
K78
LG6
MS
PQEST
PQQKQ
ROL
RXW
TN5
TWZ
U5U
UHB
UI2
UKR
UPT
UQL
VF5
VG9
VQA
W1F
WH7
X
XFK
XZL
YZZ
---
-DZ
-~X
..I
.DC
6TJ
AAHBH
AAYOK
ABJNI
ABQRX
ADHLV
ADMHC
ADUKH
AGXLV
AHGAQ
BSCLL
CUPRZ
GGK
MS~
MW2
XSW
ZCA
~A~
AAYXX
ABBLG
ABLBI
ACRPL
ADNMO
AEYZD
AGQPQ
ANPPW
CITATION
.HR
1WB
42X
8WZ
A6W
ABHMW
ACKIV
AETEA
IHE
IQODW
MVM
NHB
OHT
RNS
TAE
UBC
UBX
UBY
VJK
VOH
YV5
ZCG
ZY4
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
YIN
7TV
C1K
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7011869bc2b5c77cb055ae03874e9b9920c2303016d6629d7cfbf92a1f8636273
IEDL.DBID ACS
ISSN 0013-936X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:15:41 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:12:02 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:34:11 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:47 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:05:01 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:17:23 EDT 2024
Thu Aug 27 13:42:37 EDT 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Olfactometry
Hydrocarbon
Pollutant behavior
Volatile organic compound
Identification
Pollutant emission
Solid phase microextraction
Persistence
Gas chromatography
Additive
Health and environment
Indoor pollution
Air pollution
Aromatic compound
Odor
Mass spectrometry
Public health
Organic compounds
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a412t-7011869bc2b5c77cb055ae03874e9b9920c2303016d6629d7cfbf92a1f8636273
Notes ark:/67375/TPS-WTBP2NQJ-8
istex:605F3351B61692B86F2D68684AF4F9C1A124C0E3
Details regarding the paint formulations, the GC/MS, the GC/O and olfactory acuity can be found in descriptions S1-S4, respectively. Table S1 provides the composition information of paint ingredients. Tables S2 and S3 provide sensory evaluations (GC/O) of Paints A and B (neat) by the naïve subjects. Table S4 provides quality evaluations by paint chemists of wallboards painted with Paints A, B, and C at three different time points post painting. The sensory evaluations (GC/O) of Paint A, B, and C (after 24 h postpainting) by the paint chemists can be found in Table S5. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 18350903
PQID 20563888
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68088720
proquest_miscellaneous_20563888
pubmed_primary_18350903
pascalfrancis_primary_19972766
crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_es071555y
crossref_primary_10_1021_es071555y
istex_primary_ark_67375_TPS_WTBP2NQJ_8
acs_journals_10_1021_es071555y
ProviderPackageCode JG~
55A
AABXI
GNL
VF5
7~N
ACJ
VG9
W1F
ANTXH
ACS
AEESW
AFEFF
.K2
ABMVS
ABUCX
IH9
BAANH
AQSVZ
ED~
UI2
CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20080101
2008-01-01
2008
2008-Jan-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2008-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2008
  text: 20080101
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Washington, DC
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washington, DC
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Environmental science & technology
PublicationTitleAlternate Environ. Sci. Technol
PublicationYear 2008
Publisher American Chemical Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Chemical Society
References Lin C.-C. (ref1/ref1_1) 2007; 41
ref8/ref8_1
ref9/ref9_1
Cain W. S. (ref20/ref20_1) 1998; 23
ref21/ref21_1
Marin A. B. (ref17/ref17_1) 1992; 40
Hodgson A. T. (ref3/ref3_1) 2000; 10
Dalton P. (ref15/ref15_1) 2003; 44
Chang J. C. S. (ref2/ref2_1) 1997; 7
Censullo A. C. (ref4/ref4_1) 1997; 69
Van Faassen A. (ref6/ref6_1) 1991; 92
Dalton P. (ref14/ref14_1) 2003; 95
Sparks L. E. (ref7/ref7_1) 1999; 9
Dalton P. (ref12/ref12_1) 2006
Choi H. S. (ref18/ref18_1) 2003; 51
Clausen P. A. (ref5/ref5_1) 1993; 3
ref10/ref10_1
Ählstrom R. (ref13/ref13_1) 1986; 12
Green B. G. (ref19/ref19_1) 1993; 18
Cowart B. J. (ref16/ref16_1) 1997; 12
Ziemer P. D. (ref11/ref11_1) 2000; 72
References_xml – volume: 40
  start-page: 650
  year: 1992
  ident: ref17/ref17_1
  publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem.
  doi: 10.1021/jf00016a026
– volume: 7
  start-page: 241
  year: 1997
  ident: ref2/ref2_1
  publication-title: Indoor Air
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.00003.x
– volume: 41
  start-page: 3225
  year: 2007
  ident: ref1/ref1_1
  publication-title: Atmos. Environ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.057
– volume: 12
  start-page: 465
  year: 1997
  ident: ref16/ref16_1
  publication-title: Occup. Med.: State of the Art Rev.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 683
  year: 1993
  ident: ref19/ref19_1
  publication-title: Chem. Senses.
  doi: 10.1093/chemse/18.6.683
– volume: 12
  start-page: 574
  year: 1986
  ident: ref13/ref13_1
  publication-title: Scand. J. Work Environ. Health
  doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2100
– volume: 3
  start-page: 269
  year: 1993
  ident: ref5/ref5_1
  publication-title: Indoor Air
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00008.x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 309
  year: 1998
  ident: ref20/ref20_1
  publication-title: Chem. Senses.
  doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.3.309
– ident: ref21/ref21_1
– volume: 95
  start-page: 2113
  year: 2003
  ident: ref14/ref14_1
  publication-title: J. Appl. Physiol.
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00399.2003
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: ref15/ref15_1
  publication-title: Am. J. Ind. Med.
  doi: 10.1002/ajim.10102
– volume: 10
  start-page: 178
  year: 2000
  ident: ref3/ref3_1
  publication-title: Indoor Air
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010003178.x
– ident: ref8/ref8_1
– ident: ref9/ref9_1
– volume: 72
  start-page: 97
  year: 2000
  ident: ref11/ref11_1
  publication-title: J. Coat. Technol.
  doi: 10.1007/BF02698028
– volume: 92
  start-page: 147
  year: 1991
  ident: ref6/ref6_1
  publication-title: Environ. Health. Perspect.
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.9192147
– volume: 9
  start-page: 18
  year: 1999
  ident: ref7/ref7_1
  publication-title: Indoor Air
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-3-00004.x
– start-page: 373
  volume-title: Inhalation Toxicology
  year: 2006
  ident: ref12/ref12_1
– volume: 69
  start-page: 33
  year: 1997
  ident: ref4/ref4_1
  publication-title: J. Coat. Technol.
  doi: 10.1007/BF02696151
– ident: ref10/ref10_1
– volume: 51
  start-page: 2687
  year: 2003
  ident: ref18/ref18_1
  publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem.
  doi: 10.1021/jf021069o
SSID ssj0002308
Score 2.0048196
Snippet Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example,...
Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
istex
acs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 243
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis
Applied sciences
Construction Materials
Environmental Measurements Methods
Exact sciences and technology
Female
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Glycols
Humans
Hydrocarbons - analysis
Male
Middle Aged
Odorants - analysis
Paint
Pollution
Smell
Volatilization
Title Sensory and Analytical Evaluations of Paints With and Without Texanol
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es071555y
https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/TPS-WTBP2NQJ-8/fulltext.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18350903
https://www.proquest.com/docview/20563888
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68088720
Volume 42
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB6V9gKHAoXC8igWIMQlJXH8PJayVVWJatFu1b1ZdmKLqlVSbbIS5ddj57Wt6MItkT5byXjGM_a8AD7KnFnKDY9iZ3RECCWRlyL_GkuDnU2kliHf-fspOz4jJ3M634APazz4OPliK68FKaU3D2ALM8HDCevgcDpst96GFn2bApmyeV8-6PbQoHqy6o7q2QpU_BVCIXXlqeHaNhbr7cxG3xw9hm991k4bZnK5v6zNfvb77yKO__qVJ7Dd2ZvooGWQp7Bhix14dKsK4Q7sjlfJbh7aSXv1DMZTf8YtFzdIFzlqqpc0F99oPFQIr1Dp0ERfFHWFzi_qnw0yPJTLGs1C6kx59RzOjsazw-Ooa7sQaZLgOuIhGZVJk2FDM84zE1OqbXBzEyuNlDjOPM39xsByxrDMeeaMk1gnTjCvDnm6C5tFWdiXgHQucGqFcVgmxKZaE-YnosTFmpNY5CPY8-uiOrGpVOMRx4kaCDWCz_2SqawrWh56Z1zdB30_QK_bSh33gT416z4g9OIyhLZxqmaTqTqffZ3g0x8nSvgvu8MYqylDpjFnbATvek5RXiKDm0UXtlxWCnubMhVCrEeEdieC43gEL1oWW83uDeJwc_bqf4R5DQ_byJVwGfQGNuvF0r715lFt9hrx-ANrGQgT
linkProvider American Chemical Society
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdgewAe-BgMyscWIYR4yUgcfz6OqVMZW1XUTuubZSeOmDYlqE4lxl_P2UnTDW2Ct0S6WM75znf23f0OoQ-yYJZyw-OkNDomhJIYtAheE2lwaVOppa93Phmz0Sk5mtN5B5Pja2FgEg5GciGIv0YXSD9bB8aQUnp1H22CE4L9QWv_YNrvuuBKi1W3Apmx-QpF6Pqn3gLl7oYF2vTM_OUzIrUDppRtN4u73c1gdg6ftP2LwoRDtsnF3rIxe_nvv7Ac_--PnqLHnfcZ7bfi8gzds9UWenQNk3ALbQ_XpW9A2um-e46GUzjx1ourSFdFFLBMwjV4NOzxwl1Ul9FEn1eNi87Omx-B0j_Uyyaa-UKa-vIFOj0czg5GcdeEIdYkxU3MfWkqkybHhuac5yahVFsf9CZWGilxkgPrYZtgBWNYFjwvTSmxTkvBwDjybBttVHVlX6FIFwJnVpgSy5TYTGvCYCBKykRzkohigHaAT6pTIqdCfBynqmfUAH1arZzKOwhz30nj8jbS9z3pzxa34zaij2H5ewq9uPCJbpyq2WSqzmZfJnj8_UgJmNkN-VgP6euOOWMDtLsSGAX66YMuurL10ikMHmYmhLibwjc_ERwnA_SylbT16OAe-3u01_9izC56MJqdHKvjr-Nvb9DDNqfFXxO9RRvNYmnfgePUmJ2gMX8AcEsQdA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdgkxA88DEYKx9bhBDiJVvi-PNxjFZjQClqp_XNshNbmzYlU51KjL8eX5qmG9oEb6l0PTmXO9_Zd_c7hN7LglnKDY8TZ3RMCCVxsKLwM5EGO5tKLaHf-fuQHR6ToymdtgdF6IUJi_CBk2-S-GDVl4VrEQbSPeuDQ6SUXt1H65Cug8PW_sG423lDOC2WEwtkxqZLJKHrfwUvlPsbXmgdBPoLqiK1D4Jxi4kWd4ecjesZPEE_ukU3FSfnu_Pa7Oa__8Jz_P-3eooet1FotL9Qm2foni030KNr2IQbaLO_aoELpO0e4J-j_jicfKvZVaTLImowTZrr8Kjf4Yb7qHLRSJ-VtY9OzurThhIeqnkdTaChprp4gY4H_cnBYdwOY4g1SXEdc2hRZdLk2NCc89wklGoLyW9ipZESJ3kQf9guWMEYlgXPnXES69QJFpwkzzbRWlmVdgtFuhA4s8I4LFNiM60JC4wocYnmJBFFD20HWanWmLxq8uQ4VZ2geujj8uupvIUyh4kaF7eRvutILxf4HbcRfWhUoKPQs3MoeONUTUZjdTL5NMLDn0dKhJXd0JEVS-g_5oz10M5SaVSwU0i-6NJWc69wiDQzIcTdFDAERXCc9NDLhbatuIcwGe7TXv1LMDvowejzQH37Mvz6Gj1clLbAbdEbtFbP5vZtiJ9qs90YzR9QChL3
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory+and+Analytical+Evaluations+of+Paints+With+and+Without+Texanol&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=GALLAGHER%2C+Michelle&rft.au=DALTON%2C+Pamela&rft.au=SITVARIN%2C+Laura&rft.au=PRETI%2C+George&rft.date=2008&rft.pub=American+Chemical+Society&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Fes071555y&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=19972766
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon