Sensory and Analytical Evaluations of Paints With and Without Texanol
Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory he...
Saved in:
Published in | Environmental science & technology Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 243 - 248 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
American Chemical Society
01.01.2008
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the “persistent, characteristic odor” of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naïve (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjectsʼ prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which maytrigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems. Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3- pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems. Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which maytrigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems.Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which maytrigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the "persistent, characteristic odor" of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naive (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjects' prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems. Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example, paint emissions contain a variety of odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which may trigger reports of irritation and upper respiratory health effects. Texanol ester alcohol (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate), a paint coalescing agent, is frequently associated with the “persistent, characteristic odor” of water-based paint. To evaluate the sensory impact of Texanol, naïve (unfamiliar with paint constituents) and experienced (familiar with paint constituents) subjects evaluated the odor properties of paints with and without Texanol. VOC emissions from neat paint and paint applied to gypsum wallboard were collected via solid-phase microextraction and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/olfactometry. Regardless of subjectsʼ prior experience, aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, introduced from other paint additives and not Texanol, were most commonly associated with paint odor. However, quantitative sensory techniques demonstrated that addition of Texanol to paints led to an overall increase in the perceived intensity of the coating. The combined use of these techniques proved to be an effective methodology for analyzing the structure of paint volatiles and their sensory properties and holds promise for solving many odorous indoor air problems. |
Author | Sitvarin, Laura Gallagher, Michelle Dalton, Pamela Preti, George |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Michelle surname: Gallagher fullname: Gallagher, Michelle email: mgallagher@monell.org. – sequence: 2 givenname: Pamela surname: Dalton fullname: Dalton, Pamela – sequence: 3 givenname: Laura surname: Sitvarin fullname: Sitvarin, Laura – sequence: 4 givenname: George surname: Preti fullname: Preti, George |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19972766$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18350903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0U1vEzEQBmALFdG0cOAPoL2AxGHp2K6_jqUKX6ogqEHlZs06XuGytYvtRc2_Z9uEVEKVONmHZ16N5j0gezFFT8hzCm8oMHrkCygqhFg_IjMqGLRCC7pHZgCUt4bL7_vkoJRLAGAc9BOyTzUXYIDPyPzcx5LyusG4ak4iDusaHA7N_DcOI9aQYmlS3ywwxFqai1B_3MnbTxprs_Q3GNPwlDzucSj-2fY9JN_ezZenH9qzL-8_np6ctXhMWW0VUKql6RzrhFPKdSAEeuBaHXvTGcPATQtyoHIlJTMr5fquNwxpryWXTPFD8mqTe53Tr9GXaq9CcX4YMPo0Fis1aK0Y_BcyEJJrrSf4YgvH7sqv7HUOV5jX9u-FJvByC7BMh-kzRhfKvTNGMSXl5I42zuVUSva9daHeHbBmDIOlYG-7sruuponX_0zsQh-w7caGUv3NDmL-aaXiStjl4txeLN8u2Oevn6y-3xpdsZdpzFOz5YHcPwq0rLc |
CODEN | ESTHAG |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2016_03_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_porgcoat_2017_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1039_C4SM02215G crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chroma_2008_09_073 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2018_00350 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0003591 crossref_primary_10_3390_su132212802 crossref_primary_10_1039_C7AY02885G crossref_primary_10_1080_02652030802562920 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_buildenv_2010_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_chemse_bjr015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11998_022_00741_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2024_123067 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_talanta_2019_120301 |
Cites_doi | 10.1021/jf00016a026 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.00003.x 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.057 10.1093/chemse/18.6.683 10.5271/sjweh.2100 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00008.x 10.1093/chemse/23.3.309 10.1152/japplphysiol.00399.2003 10.1002/ajim.10102 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010003178.x 10.1007/BF02698028 10.1289/ehp.9192147 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-3-00004.x 10.1007/BF02696151 10.1021/jf021069o |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society 2008 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society – notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TV C1K 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1021/es071555y |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Pollution Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Pollution Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Pollution Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Environmental Sciences Applied Sciences |
EISSN | 1520-5851 |
EndPage | 248 |
ExternalDocumentID | 18350903 19972766 10_1021_es071555y ark_67375_TPS_WTBP2NQJ_8 c180813914 |
Genre | Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - .K2 186 1AW 3R3 4.4 4R4 53G 55A 5GY 5VS 63O 7~N 85S A AABXI ABFLS ABMVS ABOGM ABPPZ ABPTK ABUCX ABUFD ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACJ ACPRK ACS AEESW AENEX AFEFF AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ANTXH AQSVZ BAANH BKOMP CS3 DZ EBS ED ED~ EJD F5P GNL IH9 JG JG~ K2 K78 LG6 MS PQEST PQQKQ ROL RXW TN5 TWZ U5U UHB UI2 UKR UPT UQL VF5 VG9 VQA W1F WH7 X XFK XZL YZZ --- -DZ -~X ..I .DC 6TJ AAHBH AAYOK ABJNI ABQRX ADHLV ADMHC ADUKH AGXLV AHGAQ BSCLL CUPRZ GGK MS~ MW2 XSW ZCA ~A~ AAYXX ABBLG ABLBI ACRPL ADNMO AEYZD AGQPQ ANPPW CITATION .HR 1WB 42X 8WZ A6W ABHMW ACKIV AETEA IHE IQODW MVM NHB OHT RNS TAE UBC UBX UBY VJK VOH YV5 ZCG ZY4 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM YIN 7TV C1K 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-7011869bc2b5c77cb055ae03874e9b9920c2303016d6629d7cfbf92a1f8636273 |
IEDL.DBID | ACS |
ISSN | 0013-936X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:15:41 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 16:12:02 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:34:11 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:05:01 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:17:23 EDT 2024 Thu Aug 27 13:42:37 EDT 2020 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Olfactometry Hydrocarbon Pollutant behavior Volatile organic compound Identification Pollutant emission Solid phase microextraction Persistence Gas chromatography Additive Health and environment Indoor pollution Air pollution Aromatic compound Odor Mass spectrometry Public health Organic compounds |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a412t-7011869bc2b5c77cb055ae03874e9b9920c2303016d6629d7cfbf92a1f8636273 |
Notes | ark:/67375/TPS-WTBP2NQJ-8 istex:605F3351B61692B86F2D68684AF4F9C1A124C0E3 Details regarding the paint formulations, the GC/MS, the GC/O and olfactory acuity can be found in descriptions S1-S4, respectively. Table S1 provides the composition information of paint ingredients. Tables S2 and S3 provide sensory evaluations (GC/O) of Paints A and B (neat) by the naïve subjects. Table S4 provides quality evaluations by paint chemists of wallboards painted with Paints A, B, and C at three different time points post painting. The sensory evaluations (GC/O) of Paint A, B, and C (after 24 h postpainting) by the paint chemists can be found in Table S5. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 18350903 |
PQID | 20563888 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68088720 proquest_miscellaneous_20563888 pubmed_primary_18350903 pascalfrancis_primary_19972766 crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_es071555y crossref_primary_10_1021_es071555y istex_primary_ark_67375_TPS_WTBP2NQJ_8 acs_journals_10_1021_es071555y |
ProviderPackageCode | JG~ 55A AABXI GNL VF5 7~N ACJ VG9 W1F ANTXH ACS AEESW AFEFF .K2 ABMVS ABUCX IH9 BAANH AQSVZ ED~ UI2 CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20080101 2008-01-01 2008 2008-Jan-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2008 text: 20080101 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Washington, DC |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington, DC – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Environmental science & technology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Environ. Sci. Technol |
PublicationYear | 2008 |
Publisher | American Chemical Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Chemical Society |
References | Lin C.-C. (ref1/ref1_1) 2007; 41 ref8/ref8_1 ref9/ref9_1 Cain W. S. (ref20/ref20_1) 1998; 23 ref21/ref21_1 Marin A. B. (ref17/ref17_1) 1992; 40 Hodgson A. T. (ref3/ref3_1) 2000; 10 Dalton P. (ref15/ref15_1) 2003; 44 Chang J. C. S. (ref2/ref2_1) 1997; 7 Censullo A. C. (ref4/ref4_1) 1997; 69 Van Faassen A. (ref6/ref6_1) 1991; 92 Dalton P. (ref14/ref14_1) 2003; 95 Sparks L. E. (ref7/ref7_1) 1999; 9 Dalton P. (ref12/ref12_1) 2006 Choi H. S. (ref18/ref18_1) 2003; 51 Clausen P. A. (ref5/ref5_1) 1993; 3 ref10/ref10_1 Ählstrom R. (ref13/ref13_1) 1986; 12 Green B. G. (ref19/ref19_1) 1993; 18 Cowart B. J. (ref16/ref16_1) 1997; 12 Ziemer P. D. (ref11/ref11_1) 2000; 72 |
References_xml | – volume: 40 start-page: 650 year: 1992 ident: ref17/ref17_1 publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem. doi: 10.1021/jf00016a026 – volume: 7 start-page: 241 year: 1997 ident: ref2/ref2_1 publication-title: Indoor Air doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.00003.x – volume: 41 start-page: 3225 year: 2007 ident: ref1/ref1_1 publication-title: Atmos. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.057 – volume: 12 start-page: 465 year: 1997 ident: ref16/ref16_1 publication-title: Occup. Med.: State of the Art Rev. – volume: 18 start-page: 683 year: 1993 ident: ref19/ref19_1 publication-title: Chem. Senses. doi: 10.1093/chemse/18.6.683 – volume: 12 start-page: 574 year: 1986 ident: ref13/ref13_1 publication-title: Scand. J. Work Environ. Health doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2100 – volume: 3 start-page: 269 year: 1993 ident: ref5/ref5_1 publication-title: Indoor Air doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00008.x – volume: 23 start-page: 309 year: 1998 ident: ref20/ref20_1 publication-title: Chem. Senses. doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.3.309 – ident: ref21/ref21_1 – volume: 95 start-page: 2113 year: 2003 ident: ref14/ref14_1 publication-title: J. Appl. Physiol. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00399.2003 – volume: 44 start-page: 1 year: 2003 ident: ref15/ref15_1 publication-title: Am. J. Ind. Med. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10102 – volume: 10 start-page: 178 year: 2000 ident: ref3/ref3_1 publication-title: Indoor Air doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010003178.x – ident: ref8/ref8_1 – ident: ref9/ref9_1 – volume: 72 start-page: 97 year: 2000 ident: ref11/ref11_1 publication-title: J. Coat. Technol. doi: 10.1007/BF02698028 – volume: 92 start-page: 147 year: 1991 ident: ref6/ref6_1 publication-title: Environ. Health. Perspect. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9192147 – volume: 9 start-page: 18 year: 1999 ident: ref7/ref7_1 publication-title: Indoor Air doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-3-00004.x – start-page: 373 volume-title: Inhalation Toxicology year: 2006 ident: ref12/ref12_1 – volume: 69 start-page: 33 year: 1997 ident: ref4/ref4_1 publication-title: J. Coat. Technol. doi: 10.1007/BF02696151 – ident: ref10/ref10_1 – volume: 51 start-page: 2687 year: 2003 ident: ref18/ref18_1 publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem. doi: 10.1021/jf021069o |
SSID | ssj0002308 |
Score | 2.0048196 |
Snippet | Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air, yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example,... Perception of odor can figure prominently in complaints about indoor air,yet identification of the responsible compound(s) is often difficult. For example,... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref istex acs |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 243 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis Applied sciences Construction Materials Environmental Measurements Methods Exact sciences and technology Female Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Glycols Humans Hydrocarbons - analysis Male Middle Aged Odorants - analysis Paint Pollution Smell Volatilization |
Title | Sensory and Analytical Evaluations of Paints With and Without Texanol |
URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es071555y https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/TPS-WTBP2NQJ-8/fulltext.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18350903 https://www.proquest.com/docview/20563888 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68088720 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB6V9gKHAoXC8igWIMQlJXH8PJayVVWJatFu1b1ZdmKLqlVSbbIS5ddj57Wt6MItkT5byXjGM_a8AD7KnFnKDY9iZ3RECCWRlyL_GkuDnU2kliHf-fspOz4jJ3M634APazz4OPliK68FKaU3D2ALM8HDCevgcDpst96GFn2bApmyeV8-6PbQoHqy6o7q2QpU_BVCIXXlqeHaNhbr7cxG3xw9hm991k4bZnK5v6zNfvb77yKO__qVJ7Dd2ZvooGWQp7Bhix14dKsK4Q7sjlfJbh7aSXv1DMZTf8YtFzdIFzlqqpc0F99oPFQIr1Dp0ERfFHWFzi_qnw0yPJTLGs1C6kx59RzOjsazw-Ooa7sQaZLgOuIhGZVJk2FDM84zE1OqbXBzEyuNlDjOPM39xsByxrDMeeaMk1gnTjCvDnm6C5tFWdiXgHQucGqFcVgmxKZaE-YnosTFmpNY5CPY8-uiOrGpVOMRx4kaCDWCz_2SqawrWh56Z1zdB30_QK_bSh33gT416z4g9OIyhLZxqmaTqTqffZ3g0x8nSvgvu8MYqylDpjFnbATvek5RXiKDm0UXtlxWCnubMhVCrEeEdieC43gEL1oWW83uDeJwc_bqf4R5DQ_byJVwGfQGNuvF0r715lFt9hrx-ANrGQgT |
linkProvider | American Chemical Society |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdgewAe-BgMyscWIYR4yUgcfz6OqVMZW1XUTuubZSeOmDYlqE4lxl_P2UnTDW2Ct0S6WM75znf23f0OoQ-yYJZyw-OkNDomhJIYtAheE2lwaVOppa93Phmz0Sk5mtN5B5Pja2FgEg5GciGIv0YXSD9bB8aQUnp1H22CE4L9QWv_YNrvuuBKi1W3Apmx-QpF6Pqn3gLl7oYF2vTM_OUzIrUDppRtN4u73c1gdg6ftP2LwoRDtsnF3rIxe_nvv7Ac_--PnqLHnfcZ7bfi8gzds9UWenQNk3ALbQ_XpW9A2um-e46GUzjx1ourSFdFFLBMwjV4NOzxwl1Ul9FEn1eNi87Omx-B0j_Uyyaa-UKa-vIFOj0czg5GcdeEIdYkxU3MfWkqkybHhuac5yahVFsf9CZWGilxkgPrYZtgBWNYFjwvTSmxTkvBwDjybBttVHVlX6FIFwJnVpgSy5TYTGvCYCBKykRzkohigHaAT6pTIqdCfBynqmfUAH1arZzKOwhz30nj8jbS9z3pzxa34zaij2H5ewq9uPCJbpyq2WSqzmZfJnj8_UgJmNkN-VgP6euOOWMDtLsSGAX66YMuurL10ikMHmYmhLibwjc_ERwnA_SylbT16OAe-3u01_9izC56MJqdHKvjr-Nvb9DDNqfFXxO9RRvNYmnfgePUmJ2gMX8AcEsQdA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELdgkxA88DEYKx9bhBDiJVvi-PNxjFZjQClqp_XNshNbmzYlU51KjL8eX5qmG9oEb6l0PTmXO9_Zd_c7hN7LglnKDY8TZ3RMCCVxsKLwM5EGO5tKLaHf-fuQHR6ToymdtgdF6IUJi_CBk2-S-GDVl4VrEQbSPeuDQ6SUXt1H65Cug8PW_sG423lDOC2WEwtkxqZLJKHrfwUvlPsbXmgdBPoLqiK1D4Jxi4kWd4ecjesZPEE_ukU3FSfnu_Pa7Oa__8Jz_P-3eooet1FotL9Qm2foni030KNr2IQbaLO_aoELpO0e4J-j_jicfKvZVaTLImowTZrr8Kjf4Yb7qHLRSJ-VtY9OzurThhIeqnkdTaChprp4gY4H_cnBYdwOY4g1SXEdc2hRZdLk2NCc89wklGoLyW9ipZESJ3kQf9guWMEYlgXPnXES69QJFpwkzzbRWlmVdgtFuhA4s8I4LFNiM60JC4wocYnmJBFFD20HWanWmLxq8uQ4VZ2geujj8uupvIUyh4kaF7eRvutILxf4HbcRfWhUoKPQs3MoeONUTUZjdTL5NMLDn0dKhJXd0JEVS-g_5oz10M5SaVSwU0i-6NJWc69wiDQzIcTdFDAERXCc9NDLhbatuIcwGe7TXv1LMDvowejzQH37Mvz6Gj1clLbAbdEbtFbP5vZtiJ9qs90YzR9QChL3 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory+and+Analytical+Evaluations+of+Paints+With+and+Without+Texanol&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=GALLAGHER%2C+Michelle&rft.au=DALTON%2C+Pamela&rft.au=SITVARIN%2C+Laura&rft.au=PRETI%2C+George&rft.date=2008&rft.pub=American+Chemical+Society&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Fes071555y&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=19972766 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |