Wine pH Prevails over Buffering Capacity of Human Saliva
Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9–3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pK a = 6.1). Few data are available on...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Vol. 64; no. 43; pp. 8154 - 8159 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
02.11.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9–3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pK a = 6.1). Few data are available on whether the buffering capacity of saliva may alter the pH of wine and thus its sensorial properties. In this study both in vitro and in vivo approaches were conducted to measure pH in mixtures of representative red and white wines with human saliva. Continuous additions of microvolumes of either wine to a definite volume (3 mL) of saliva in vitro resulted in a progressive and steep decline in the pH of the wine/saliva mixture. Thus, a few microliters of either wine (<0.27 mL) was sufficient to reduce the pH of saliva by 1 pH unit. Further additions of wine to saliva lowered the pH to that of the corresponding wine. In the in vivo assay, definite volumes (1.5–18 mL) of either wine were mixed for 15 s with the mouth saliva of individual healthy subjects before pH determination in the expectorated wine/saliva mixtures. Compared to saliva, pronounced decreases in pH were observed, thus approaching the pH of wine even with the smallest volume of wine in the assay. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the buffering capacity of wine prevails over that of saliva and that during degustation the pH of the wine/saliva mixture in the mouth is, at least temporarily, that of the corresponding wine. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9-3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pKa = 6.1). Few data are available on whether the buffering capacity of saliva may alter the pH of wine and thus its sensorial properties. In this study both in vitro and in vivo approaches were conducted to measure pH in mixtures of representative red and white wines with human saliva. Continuous additions of microvolumes of either wine to a definite volume (3 mL) of saliva in vitro resulted in a progressive and steep decline in the pH of the wine/saliva mixture. Thus, a few microliters of either wine (<0.27 mL) was sufficient to reduce the pH of saliva by 1 pH unit. Further additions of wine to saliva lowered the pH to that of the corresponding wine. In the in vivo assay, definite volumes (1.5-18 mL) of either wine were mixed for 15 s with the mouth saliva of individual healthy subjects before pH determination in the expectorated wine/saliva mixtures. Compared to saliva, pronounced decreases in pH were observed, thus approaching the pH of wine even with the smallest volume of wine in the assay. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the buffering capacity of wine prevails over that of saliva and that during degustation the pH of the wine/saliva mixture in the mouth is, at least temporarily, that of the corresponding wine.Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9-3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pKa = 6.1). Few data are available on whether the buffering capacity of saliva may alter the pH of wine and thus its sensorial properties. In this study both in vitro and in vivo approaches were conducted to measure pH in mixtures of representative red and white wines with human saliva. Continuous additions of microvolumes of either wine to a definite volume (3 mL) of saliva in vitro resulted in a progressive and steep decline in the pH of the wine/saliva mixture. Thus, a few microliters of either wine (<0.27 mL) was sufficient to reduce the pH of saliva by 1 pH unit. Further additions of wine to saliva lowered the pH to that of the corresponding wine. In the in vivo assay, definite volumes (1.5-18 mL) of either wine were mixed for 15 s with the mouth saliva of individual healthy subjects before pH determination in the expectorated wine/saliva mixtures. Compared to saliva, pronounced decreases in pH were observed, thus approaching the pH of wine even with the smallest volume of wine in the assay. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the buffering capacity of wine prevails over that of saliva and that during degustation the pH of the wine/saliva mixture in the mouth is, at least temporarily, that of the corresponding wine. Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9–3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pK a = 6.1). Few data are available on whether the buffering capacity of saliva may alter the pH of wine and thus its sensorial properties. In this study both in vitro and in vivo approaches were conducted to measure pH in mixtures of representative red and white wines with human saliva. Continuous additions of microvolumes of either wine to a definite volume (3 mL) of saliva in vitro resulted in a progressive and steep decline in the pH of the wine/saliva mixture. Thus, a few microliters of either wine (<0.27 mL) was sufficient to reduce the pH of saliva by 1 pH unit. Further additions of wine to saliva lowered the pH to that of the corresponding wine. In the in vivo assay, definite volumes (1.5–18 mL) of either wine were mixed for 15 s with the mouth saliva of individual healthy subjects before pH determination in the expectorated wine/saliva mixtures. Compared to saliva, pronounced decreases in pH were observed, thus approaching the pH of wine even with the smallest volume of wine in the assay. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the buffering capacity of wine prevails over that of saliva and that during degustation the pH of the wine/saliva mixture in the mouth is, at least temporarily, that of the corresponding wine. Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9–3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pKₐ = 6.1). Few data are available on whether the buffering capacity of saliva may alter the pH of wine and thus its sensorial properties. In this study both in vitro and in vivo approaches were conducted to measure pH in mixtures of representative red and white wines with human saliva. Continuous additions of microvolumes of either wine to a definite volume (3 mL) of saliva in vitro resulted in a progressive and steep decline in the pH of the wine/saliva mixture. Thus, a few microliters of either wine (<0.27 mL) was sufficient to reduce the pH of saliva by 1 pH unit. Further additions of wine to saliva lowered the pH to that of the corresponding wine. In the in vivo assay, definite volumes (1.5–18 mL) of either wine were mixed for 15 s with the mouth saliva of individual healthy subjects before pH determination in the expectorated wine/saliva mixtures. Compared to saliva, pronounced decreases in pH were observed, thus approaching the pH of wine even with the smallest volume of wine in the assay. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the buffering capacity of wine prevails over that of saliva and that during degustation the pH of the wine/saliva mixture in the mouth is, at least temporarily, that of the corresponding wine. Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9-3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth saliva, the pH of which is near 7.0. This is buffered predominantly by the carbonate/bicarbonate pair (pK = 6.1). Few data are available on whether the buffering capacity of saliva may alter the pH of wine and thus its sensorial properties. In this study both in vitro and in vivo approaches were conducted to measure pH in mixtures of representative red and white wines with human saliva. Continuous additions of microvolumes of either wine to a definite volume (3 mL) of saliva in vitro resulted in a progressive and steep decline in the pH of the wine/saliva mixture. Thus, a few microliters of either wine (<0.27 mL) was sufficient to reduce the pH of saliva by 1 pH unit. Further additions of wine to saliva lowered the pH to that of the corresponding wine. In the in vivo assay, definite volumes (1.5-18 mL) of either wine were mixed for 15 s with the mouth saliva of individual healthy subjects before pH determination in the expectorated wine/saliva mixtures. Compared to saliva, pronounced decreases in pH were observed, thus approaching the pH of wine even with the smallest volume of wine in the assay. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the buffering capacity of wine prevails over that of saliva and that during degustation the pH of the wine/saliva mixture in the mouth is, at least temporarily, that of the corresponding wine. |
Author | Obreque-Slier, Elías Espínola-Espínola, Valeria López-Solís, Remigio |
AuthorAffiliation | University of Chile Department of Agro-Industry and Enology, Faculty of Agronomical Sciences Program of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine−ICBM |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Agro-Industry and Enology, Faculty of Agronomical Sciences – name: University of Chile – name: Program of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine−ICBM |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Elías surname: Obreque-Slier fullname: Obreque-Slier, Elías – sequence: 2 givenname: Valeria surname: Espínola-Espínola fullname: Espínola-Espínola, Valeria – sequence: 3 givenname: Remigio surname: López-Solís fullname: López-Solís, Remigio email: rlopez@med.uchile.cl |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUtLAzEUhYNU7EP3rmSWLpx6k3QymaUWtUJBQcVlyEzvSMq8TGYK_fdmbLsRVLJIuPnOgXvOmAyqukJCzilMKTB6rTM3Xes8m4oUOFB-REY0YhBGlMoBGYFnQhkJOiRj59YAIKMYTsiQxTHjSUxHRL6bCoNmETxb3GhTuKDeoA1uuzxHa6qPYK4bnZl2G9R5sOhKXQUvujAbfUqOc104PNvfE_J2f_c6X4TLp4fH-c0y1DNK2zBlkeSrhCLrT84Ycowh8aNVnEqWciYQmMwAUyFmHsxyFs10qsG_MEr5hFzufBtbf3boWlUal2FR6ArrzikG_ZZCCv4vSiWPuBA8oR692KNdWuJKNdaU2m7VIRgPiB2Q2do5i7nyIejW1FVrfUyKguobUL4B1Teg9g14IfwQHrz_kFztJN8_dWcrH-jv-BcXipcV |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2018_08_072 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13411_017_0054_z crossref_primary_10_3390_beverages7030057 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12052555 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods12234277 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodhyd_2023_109274 crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_20236802003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2020_128957 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2024_113964 crossref_primary_10_1002_fft2_256 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2020_1791794 crossref_primary_10_1039_D0FO02415E crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbamem_2019_183133 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodhyd_2022_108106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chroma_2023_464266 crossref_primary_10_3390_chemosensors11020098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2019_125204 crossref_primary_10_2298_SGS2204160P crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodhyd_2020_106109 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2021_104454 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules28217423 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2022_135200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crfs_2023_100626 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodhyd_2021_106918 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_27380_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods12051018 crossref_primary_10_1111_1541_4337_70035 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02437.x 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00071-0 10.1093/chemse/bju014 10.1039/C5SM01936B 10.1159/000077762 10.1177/00220345900690050601 10.1016/j.foodres.2005.04.007 10.1021/jf063674n 10.1016/S1005-9040(06)60106-2 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80658-3 10.3390/molecules20058453 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1995.59.10.tb02976.x 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.039 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.06.009 10.1177/00220345870660S203 10.1177/08959374000140010601 10.1007/s12078-015-9196-5 10.1007/s10529-005-0936-5 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.028 10.1093/chemse/bjh118 10.1177/00220345900690030101 10.1007/BF03168467 10.1067/mpr.2001.113778 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.059 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02644.x 10.1177/10454411000110020501 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.005 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03013 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1520-5118 |
EndPage | 8159 |
ExternalDocumentID | 27723971 10_1021_acs_jafc_6b03013 e7934790 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 55A 5GY 7~N 85S AABXI ABFLS ABMVS ABUCX ACGFS ACJ ACS AEESW AENEX AFEFF ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQSVZ CS3 DU5 EBS ED ED~ EJD F5P GNL GX1 IH9 JG JG~ LG6 P2P ROL TWZ UI2 VF5 VG9 W1F WH7 X --- -~X .K2 4.4 5VS AAHBH AAYXX ABBLG ABJNI ABLBI ABQRX ACGFO ADHLV AGXLV AHGAQ BAANH CITATION CUPRZ GGK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-b2583d91e2e2e2f22e3e7093d9d7b82b326e028c0eb664d91cf254aba01cfe5b3 |
IEDL.DBID | ACS |
ISSN | 0021-8561 1520-5118 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:30:54 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:48:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:52 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:18:40 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 27 13:42:22 EDT 2020 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 43 |
Keywords | saliva pH buffering capacity degustation titratable acidity wine |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a411t-b2583d91e2e2e2f22e3e7093d9d7b82b326e028c0eb664d91cf254aba01cfe5b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/145464 |
PMID | 27723971 |
PQID | 1835366391 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2000216863 proquest_miscellaneous_1835366391 pubmed_primary_27723971 crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_acs_jafc_6b03013 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_6b03013 acs_journals_10_1021_acs_jafc_6b03013 |
ProviderPackageCode | JG~ 55A AABXI GNL VF5 7~N ACJ VG9 W1F ACS AEESW AFEFF ABMVS ABUCX IH9 AQSVZ ED~ UI2 CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20161102 2016-11-02 2016-Nov-02 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-11-02 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2016 text: 20161102 day: 02 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Agric. Food Chem |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | American Chemical Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Chemical Society |
References | ref9/cit9 ref6/cit6 ref3/cit3 ref27/cit27 ref18/cit18 ref25/cit25 ref16/cit16 ref29/cit29 Bradley R. M. (ref23/cit23) 2007 ref32/cit32 ref14/cit14 ref8/cit8 ref5/cit5 Nordbö H. (ref11/cit11) 1984; 4 ref31/cit31 ref2/cit2 ref34/cit34 ref28/cit28 ref20/cit20 ref17/cit17 ref10/cit10 ref19/cit19 ref21/cit21 ref12/cit12 ref15/cit15 Durán V. (ref26/cit26) 1998; 126 ref22/cit22 ref13/cit13 ref33/cit33 Moss M. E. (ref7/cit7) 1995; 59 ref4/cit4 ref1/cit1 ref24/cit24 Fejerskov O. (ref30/cit30) 2008 |
References_xml | – ident: ref18/cit18 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02437.x – ident: ref31/cit31 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00071-0 – start-page: 640 volume-title: Dental Caries. The Disease and Its Clinical Management year: 2008 ident: ref30/cit30 – ident: ref2/cit2 – ident: ref14/cit14 – ident: ref27/cit27 doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju014 – ident: ref34/cit34 doi: 10.1039/C5SM01936B – ident: ref4/cit4 doi: 10.1159/000077762 – ident: ref17/cit17 doi: 10.1177/00220345900690050601 – ident: ref1/cit1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2005.04.007 – ident: ref13/cit13 doi: 10.1021/jf063674n – ident: ref15/cit15 doi: 10.1016/S1005-9040(06)60106-2 – ident: ref32/cit32 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80658-3 – ident: ref29/cit29 doi: 10.3390/molecules20058453 – volume: 59 start-page: 932 issue: 10 year: 1995 ident: ref7/cit7 publication-title: J. Dent. Educ. doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1995.59.10.tb02976.x – ident: ref25/cit25 doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.039 – ident: ref6/cit6 doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.06.009 – ident: ref8/cit8 doi: 10.1177/00220345870660S203 – ident: ref9/cit9 doi: 10.1177/08959374000140010601 – ident: ref12/cit12 – ident: ref28/cit28 doi: 10.1007/s12078-015-9196-5 – ident: ref5/cit5 doi: 10.1007/s10529-005-0936-5 – ident: ref19/cit19 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.028 – ident: ref24/cit24 doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh118 – ident: ref22/cit22 doi: 10.1177/00220345900690030101 – ident: ref10/cit10 doi: 10.1007/BF03168467 – start-page: 162 volume-title: The Role of the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract in Gustatory Processing year: 2007 ident: ref23/cit23 – ident: ref3/cit3 doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113778 – ident: ref33/cit33 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.059 – ident: ref20/cit20 doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02644.x – volume: 4 start-page: 302 year: 1984 ident: ref11/cit11 publication-title: Scand. J. Dent. Res. – volume: 126 start-page: 1330 year: 1998 ident: ref26/cit26 publication-title: Rev. Med. Chile – ident: ref21/cit21 doi: 10.1177/10454411000110020501 – ident: ref16/cit16 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.005 |
SSID | ssj0008570 |
Score | 2.3561635 |
Snippet | Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9–3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth... Wine is an acidic beverage; its pH (2.9-3.8) is critically important to its organoleptic properties. During degustation, wine interacts with <1 mL of mouth... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref acs |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 8154 |
SubjectTerms | Adult bicarbonates buffering capacity Female Humans Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Male mouth saliva Saliva - chemistry sensory properties white wines Wine |
Title | Wine pH Prevails over Buffering Capacity of Human Saliva |
URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03013 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723971 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1835366391 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000216863 |
Volume | 64 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3JTsMwELWgXODAvpRNRoIDh7SxnbjJsVRUFRJcSkVvke3YCKjSqkkufD3jJC1iaVVFiiJrHGe8ZJ499huErkXsaspN6HjSFXBj2pEqNA4znEipNG_Fdh3y8Yn3Bt7D0B9-0-T89uBT0hQqbbwLoxpcWvjO1tEG5TCGLQzq9Od_XUvUXm7nIE4AoKBySf73BmuIVPrTEC1Al4WV6e6U4YrSgpzQbi75aOSZbKjPv9SNKyiwi7YrsInbZe_YQ2s62Udb7ddpRbihD1DwAjATT3rYcjmJt1GK7Z5OfJfbuClg1nAHrKkCqI7HBhcr_rgvrPvoEA2698-dnlNFU3CER0jmSOoHLA6JpvYylGqmW24ISXFLBlQCjtMANpSrJeceCCoDk0chhQtP2pfsCNWScaJPENbCV9YFyQRzvZjCrIh53ATGNzElTNI6ugGlo2o0pFHh6KYkKhKhJqKqJuqoOWuCSFWU5DYyxmhJjtt5jklJx7FE9mrWqhGMGesIEYke5_A9ADsZQK2QLJaxR5go4aBaHR2XXWJeIoUpCeA4crqinmdoE3AWL44w0nNUy6a5vgAsk8nLohN_AUuJ7JI |
linkProvider | American Chemical Society |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3JTsMwEB2VcgAO7EtZjQQHDimxnbjJsVSgAi0HFsEtsh0bsaitmvbC1zNO0yIQIFCkKLK8jT3OPHvsZ4ADmfqGCRt7gfIlvrjxlI6tx62gSmkjaqlbh2xfieZdcPEQPpSAjs_CYCUyzCnLnfgf7AL02IU9S6urQjkUz6dgGrEIc0pdb9xMfr6Or320q4N6EWKDwjP5XQ7OHunssz36AWTmxuZsAa4n1cz3mLxUhwNV1W9fGBz_JccizBfQk9RHurIEJdNZhrn6Y7-g3zArEN0j6CS9JnHMTvLpNSNuhyc5GbpbVNDIkQbaVo3AnXQtydf_yY10zqRVuDs7vW00veJuBU8GlA48xcKIpzE1zD2WMcNNzY8xKK2piClEdQahh_aNEiLAiNriVFIq6eOXCRVfg3Kn2zEbQIwMtXNIcsn9IGU4R-KBsJENbcooV6wChyh0UoyNLMnd3owmeSC2RFK0RAWOxz2R6IKg3N2T8fpLiqNJit6InOOXuPvjzk1wBDm3iOyY7hDrgyCUI_CK6c9x3IEmRgWKVoH1kWZMSmQ4QUFURzf_KOcezDRv262kdX51uQWziMBEfriRbUN50B-aHUQ5A7Wb6_U7TPT08w |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Rb9MwED6VIiH2sMFgWzcGngQPe0gX24mbPJaOqsA2IZWyvkW2Y0_bqrZa2pf9-t2laSUQrUCRosiynTv7nPuczz4DfNR56ITyaRCZUONNusDY1AfSK26MdaqV03_IyyvVG0TfhvGwBvFyLwwKUWBNRUni06ie5r6KMMDPKP1Oe9tUhpC8fAbPibUjw253-qsPMMVsX6zs4EGC-KBiJ_9WA_kkW_zuk9YAzdLhdHfg10rUcp3JfXM-M037-EcUx__W5RVsVxCUtRc28xpqbrwLW-2bhyoMh3sDyTWCTzbtMYrwpG9HBaOVnuzznE5TQWfHOuhjLQJ4NvGs5AFYXxOp9BYG3S8_O72gOmMh0BHns8CIOJF5yp2gywvhpGuFKSblLZMIg-jOIQSxoTNKRZjRepxSaqNDfHKxkXtQH0_G7gCY07ElYlJqGUa5wLmSjJRPfOxzwaURDfiESmfVGCmykv4WPCsTsSWyqiUacLbsjcxWgcrpvIzRhhKnqxLTRZCODXlPlh2c4UgiekSP3WSO8iAYlQjAUr4-D21sElyhag3YX1jH6o0CJyqI7vjhP-r5AV78OO9mF1-vvh_BSwRiqtzjKN5BffYwd8cIdmbmfWnaT16p93Y |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wine+pH+Prevails+over+Buffering+Capacity+of+Human+Saliva&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+agricultural+and+food+chemistry&rft.au=Obreque-Slier%2C+El%C3%ADas&rft.au=Esp%C3%ADnola-Esp%C3%ADnola%2C+Valeria&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-Sol%C3%ADs%2C+Remigio&rft.date=2016-11-02&rft.issn=1520-5118&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=43+p.8154-8159&rft.spage=8154&rft.epage=8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Facs.jafc.6b03013&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8561&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8561&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8561&client=summon |