Predictive Endocrine Testing in the 21st Century Using in Vitro Assays of Estrogen Receptor Signaling Responses

Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals incl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental science & technology Vol. 48; no. 15; pp. 8706 - 8716
Main Authors Rotroff, Daniel M, Martin, Matt T, Dix, David J, Filer, Dayne L, Houck, Keith A, Knudsen, Thomas B, Sipes, Nisha S, Reif, David M, Xia, Menghang, Huang, Ruili, Judson, Richard S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 05.08.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0013-936X
1520-5851
1520-5851
DOI10.1021/es502676e

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization.
AbstractList Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERx-agr-x/ER beta selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization.
Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERx-agr-x/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization.Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization.
Author Rotroff, Daniel M
Filer, Dayne L
Knudsen, Thomas B
Dix, David J
Reif, David M
Xia, Menghang
Huang, Ruili
Martin, Matt T
Judson, Richard S
Houck, Keith A
Sipes, Nisha S
AuthorAffiliation University of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
– name: University of North Carolina
– name: National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Daniel M
  surname: Rotroff
  fullname: Rotroff, Daniel M
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Matt T
  surname: Martin
  fullname: Martin, Matt T
– sequence: 3
  givenname: David J
  surname: Dix
  fullname: Dix, David J
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dayne L
  surname: Filer
  fullname: Filer, Dayne L
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Keith A
  surname: Houck
  fullname: Houck, Keith A
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Thomas B
  surname: Knudsen
  fullname: Knudsen, Thomas B
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Nisha S
  surname: Sipes
  fullname: Sipes, Nisha S
– sequence: 8
  givenname: David M
  surname: Reif
  fullname: Reif, David M
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Menghang
  surname: Xia
  fullname: Xia, Menghang
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Ruili
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Ruili
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Richard S
  surname: Judson
  fullname: Judson, Richard S
  email: judson.richard@epa.gov
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqN0lFrFDEQAOAgFXutPvgHJCBCfVg7SS7J5rEcZxUKSj3FtyW7O3um7CXXJCvcvzf1riJV0Kcw5JshM5kTcuSDR0KeM3jDgLNzTBK40gofkRmTHCpZS3ZEZgBMVEaor8fkJKUbAOAC6ifkmM-NAl7DjISPEXvXZfcd6dL3oYvOI11hys6vqfM0f0PKWcp0gT5PcUc_p8PNF5djoBcp2V2iYaDLVOI1enqNHW5ziPSTW3s73vFrTNvgE6an5PFgx4TPDucpWb1drhbvqqsPl-8XF1eVnYPJlZbQWwkMeykFzEvAWS20nfd9J6wY2lYZ1jJbG9Xi0BkUrZK8lsZwLbEXp-RsX3Ybw-1Uumk2LnU4jtZjmFLDyyyYAab1PymTqoxRaV3_B5VMgdFKFPryAb0JUyzT-Kl4bUAbWdSLg5raDfbNNrqNjbvm_n8KON-DLoaUIg5N57LNLvgcrRsbBs3dBjS_NqBkvH6QcV_0b_bV3tou_fa-P9wP-5q6pw
CODEN ESTHAG
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_10408444_2017_1289150
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2021_127800
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfw026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tiv_2016_09_008
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_21723
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2018_10_194
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2024_135351
crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP2589
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00204_016_1824_6
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrestox_5b00358
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_estlett_5b00220
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cplett_2018_06_022
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408444_2016_1272095
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2020_113962
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_toxlet_2018_07_011
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_1c01339
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_08_175
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfv168
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tox_2016_09_014
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00204_015_1568_8
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_orglett_8b02929
crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP1122
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_01_340
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2018_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b02273
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2015_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reprotox_2014_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1089_adt_2021_059
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0177902
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2015_1126547
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygcen_2019_113325
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2016_00092
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_9b01543
crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP9297
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2022_113330
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2015_83
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_etap_2017_05_015
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_1c01228
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408444_2016_1193722
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2022_116206
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfy187
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrestox_6b00037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2019_114774
crossref_primary_10_1002_etc_5771
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88675_w
crossref_primary_10_1111_ina_12607
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms16011008
crossref_primary_10_1159_000442748
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2015_08_093
crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1510352
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_170603
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b04832
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfx085
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2025_137167
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfw152
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2015_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13321_018_0300_0
crossref_primary_10_1089_scd_2014_0531
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrestox_5b00342
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_8258
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2018_05_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_talanta_2017_07_068
crossref_primary_10_1021_cr500319v
crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1510183
Cites_doi 10.1093/jn/135.11.2687
10.1038/nrendo.2010.87
10.1289/ehp.5686
10.1210/endo.138.3.4979
10.1021/tx400117y
10.1677/joe.0.1520159
10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.07.005
10.1016/j.mce.2006.08.008
10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00437-1
10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370
10.1006/rtph.1997.1100
10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.011
10.1073/pnas.97.11.5936
10.1002/etc.1825
10.1016/S0022-3565(24)38923-2
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.007
10.1126/science.277.5331.1508
10.1289/ehp.1205065
10.1371/journal.pone.0029835
10.1677/joe.0.1630379
10.1016/j.taap.2010.05.017
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 5, 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
– notice: Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 5, 2014
DBID N~.
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7ST
7T7
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1021/es502676e
DatabaseName American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Toxicology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Environment Abstracts

Biotechnology Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
AGRICOLA
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: N~.
  name: American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access
  url: https://pubs.acs.org
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1520-5851
EndPage 8716
ExternalDocumentID 3401118911
24960280
10_1021_es502676e
b154557598
Genre Journal Article
Feature
GroupedDBID -
.K2
1AW
3R3
4.4
4R4
53G
55A
5GY
5VS
63O
7~N
85S
AABXI
ABFLS
ABMVS
ABOGM
ABPPZ
ABPTK
ABUCX
ABUFD
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACJ
ACPRK
ACS
AEESW
AENEX
AFEFF
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQSVZ
BAANH
BKOMP
CS3
DZ
EBS
ED
ED~
EJD
F5P
GNL
IH9
JG
JG~
K2
LG6
MS
N~.
PQEST
PQQKQ
ROL
RXW
TN5
TWZ
U5U
UHB
UI2
UKR
UPT
VF5
VG9
VQA
W1F
WH7
X
XFK
XZL
YZZ
---
-DZ
-~X
..I
.DC
6TJ
AAHBH
AAYXX
ABBLG
ABJNI
ABLBI
ABQRX
ADHLV
ADUKH
AGXLV
AHGAQ
CITATION
CUPRZ
GGK
MS~
MW2
XSW
ZCA
.HR
186
1WB
42X
8WZ
A6W
AAYOK
ABHMW
ABTAH
ACKIV
ACRPL
ADMHC
ADNMO
AETEA
AEYZD
ANPPW
ANTXH
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
IHE
MVM
NHB
NPM
OHT
RNS
TAE
UBC
UBX
UBY
UQL
VJK
VOH
YV5
ZCG
ZY4
~A~
7QO
7ST
7T7
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7X8
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-750da501ed553040da21837a4ddc3a3fbb691b1a896befc9e3b6528599275ed3
IEDL.DBID N~.
ISSN 0013-936X
1520-5851
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 08:08:30 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:45:12 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:27:43 EDT 2025
Sun Jun 29 15:24:10 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:34 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 12:05:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:39 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 27 13:42:06 EDT 2020
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 15
Language English
License http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a409t-750da501ed553040da21837a4ddc3a3fbb691b1a896befc9e3b6528599275ed3
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502676e
PMID 24960280
PQID 1552890795
PQPubID 45412
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2000190177
proquest_miscellaneous_1560136778
proquest_miscellaneous_1551609763
proquest_journals_1552890795
pubmed_primary_24960280
crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_es502676e
crossref_primary_10_1021_es502676e
acs_journals_10_1021_es502676e
ProviderPackageCode JG~
55A
AABXI
GNL
VF5
7~N
ACJ
VG9
W1F
ACS
AEESW
AFEFF
.K2
ABMVS
ABUCX
IH9
BAANH
AQSVZ
ED~
N~.
UI2
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-08-05
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-08-05
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-08-05
  day: 05
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Easton
PublicationTitle Environmental science & technology
PublicationTitleAlternate Environ. Sci. Technol
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher American Chemical Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Chemical Society
References Pravettoni A. (ref14/cit14) 2007; 263
ref18/cit18
Cooper R. L. (ref6/cit6) 1997; 152
Bigsby R. (ref7/cit7) 1999; 107
Rotroff D. M. (ref17/cit17) 2013; 26
Mahoney M. M. (ref9/cit9) 2010; 247
Soto A. M. (ref4/cit4) 2010; 6
ref32/cit32
Totta P. (ref28/cit28) 2005; 135
Odum J. (ref25/cit25) 1997; 25
Weihua Z. (ref31/cit31) 2000; 97
ref20/cit20
Benjamini Y. (ref21/cit21) 1995
Caldwell D. J. (ref26/cit26) 2012; 31
Birnbaum L. S. (ref3/cit3) 2003; 111
Nelson E. R. (ref5/cit5) 2013; 53
ref10/cit10
ref19/cit19
Paech K. (ref23/cit23) 1997; 277
Dutertre M. (ref16/cit16) 2000; 295
Rotroff D. M. (ref22/cit22) 2013; 121
Kolasa A. (ref11/cit11) 2003; 62
Roberge M. (ref30/cit30) 2004; 154
Saunders P. T. (ref12/cit12) 2002; 87
Kavlock R. J. (ref8/cit8) 1996; 104
Gustafsson J. A. (ref13/cit13) 1999; 163
ref24/cit24
Gutendorf B. (ref27/cit27) 2001; 166
Cui J. (ref2/cit2) 2013; 19
Kuiper G. G. J. M. (ref15/cit15) 1997; 138
Couse J. F. (ref1/cit1) 1999; 20
Zhang C.-Y. (ref29/cit29) 2012; 7
References_xml – volume: 135
  start-page: 2687
  year: 2005
  ident: ref28/cit28
  publication-title: J. Nutr.
  doi: 10.1093/jn/135.11.2687
– ident: ref20/cit20
– volume: 6
  start-page: 363
  year: 2010
  ident: ref4/cit4
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.
  doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.87
– volume: 111
  start-page: 389
  year: 2003
  ident: ref3/cit3
  publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect.
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.5686
– volume: 138
  start-page: 863
  year: 1997
  ident: ref15/cit15
  publication-title: Endocrinology
  doi: 10.1210/endo.138.3.4979
– ident: ref32/cit32
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1097
  year: 2013
  ident: ref17/cit17
  publication-title: Chem. Res. Toxicol.
  doi: 10.1021/tx400117y
– volume: 152
  start-page: 159
  year: 1997
  ident: ref6/cit6
  publication-title: J. Endocrinol.
  doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1520159
– ident: ref24/cit24
– volume: 154
  start-page: 61
  year: 2004
  ident: ref30/cit30
  publication-title: Toxicol. Lett.
  doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.07.005
– ident: ref10/cit10
– volume: 263
  start-page: 46
  year: 2007
  ident: ref14/cit14
  publication-title: Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.08.008
– ident: ref18/cit18
– volume: 87
  start-page: 2706
  year: 2002
  ident: ref12/cit12
  publication-title: J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
– ident: ref19/cit19
– volume: 166
  start-page: 79
  year: 2001
  ident: ref27/cit27
  publication-title: Toxicology
  doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00437-1
– volume: 20
  start-page: 358
  year: 1999
  ident: ref1/cit1
  publication-title: Endocr. Rev.
  doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370
– volume: 25
  start-page: 176
  year: 1997
  ident: ref25/cit25
  publication-title: Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. RTP
  doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1100
– volume: 104
  start-page: 715
  year: 1996
  ident: ref8/cit8
  publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect.
– volume: 62
  start-page: 467
  year: 2003
  ident: ref11/cit11
  publication-title: Folia Morphol.
– volume: 53
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  ident: ref5/cit5
  publication-title: Bone
  doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.011
– volume: 97
  start-page: 5936
  year: 2000
  ident: ref31/cit31
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5936
– volume: 107
  start-page: 613
  year: 1999
  ident: ref7/cit7
  publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1396
  year: 2012
  ident: ref26/cit26
  publication-title: Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
  doi: 10.1002/etc.1825
– volume: 295
  start-page: 431
  year: 2000
  ident: ref16/cit16
  publication-title: J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)38923-2
– start-page: 289
  year: 1995
  ident: ref21/cit21
  publication-title: J. R. Statist. Soc. B
  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
– volume: 19
  start-page: 197
  year: 2013
  ident: ref2/cit2
  publication-title: Trends Mol. Med.
  doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.007
– volume: 277
  start-page: 1508
  year: 1997
  ident: ref23/cit23
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1508
– volume: 121
  start-page: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: ref22/cit22
  publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect.
  doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205065
– volume: 7
  start-page: e29835
  year: 2012
  ident: ref29/cit29
  publication-title: PloS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029835
– volume: 163
  start-page: 379
  year: 1999
  ident: ref13/cit13
  publication-title: J. Endocrinol.
  doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1630379
– volume: 247
  start-page: 98
  year: 2010
  ident: ref9/cit9
  publication-title: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.05.017
SSID ssj0002308
Score 2.4158006
Snippet Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
acs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 8706
SubjectTerms agonists
Algorithms
Animals
antagonists
Biological Assay
cell growth
Chemicals
drugs
Endocrine Disruptors - analysis
Endocrine system
endocrine-disrupting chemicals
Estrogen Antagonists - analysis
Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists
Estrogen Receptor alpha - antagonists & inhibitors
Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists
Estrogen Receptor beta - antagonists & inhibitors
estrogen receptors
Estrogens
Estrogens - analysis
Food additives
High-Throughput Screening Assays
Humans
in vitro studies
inert ingredients
MCF-7 Cells
Models, Chemical
Pesticides
prioritization
screening
Sensitivity analysis
Signal Transduction
Title Predictive Endocrine Testing in the 21st Century Using in Vitro Assays of Estrogen Receptor Signaling Responses
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502676e
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960280
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1552890795
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1551609763
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1560136778
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000190177
Volume 48
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9swDCa69LIdiq5bt3RpoD0Ou3irZD3sYxGkKAq0GNZsyC2QLLkIMNhF7B566W8faTteCjSrb4I_w4ZIkR9NiQT4otFLSG5sJNMQR1SQK3LSxJHTScArTVVOP_Qvr_T5L3kxV_Md-Lwlgy_491Ap6pKkwwvYFToxpLpXD996c4scOlm3KUhjPV-XD9p8lFxPVj12PVv4ZONXzvZhryOE7LSV4GvYCcUBvNooE3gAh9N_p9EQ2i3H6g2UP1aUZyGLxaaFLzM6ysdmVDijuGHLgiG7Y4JXNZu0voU1OwTozu9lvSoZCsfeV6zM2bTCMSoTQx4ZbjEQZ9fLGyLpCP_Z7qMN1VuYnU1nk_Oo66AQWYzb6gjpgLfqhAdP3YEkDogRGSu9z2Ib587plDtuk1S7kGcoLqcVlbRLhVHBx4cwKMoivAeGBlUGI6UPPpNc5C5QdGtzZYTPMy6GMMYZXnQLoFo0uW3BF70IhvB1PfmLrCs_Tl0w_jwF_dRDb9uaG0-BRmsJbrxVKUqcmlQN4WN_GxcMZUFsEcq7BsP1CbKw-H8Y3dSyM8l2jGjoMRo0M4R3rQb1X4sxraac9dFzs_IBXiIDk82OQjWCQb26C8fIcmo3RpY_uR43uv4XczX31g
linkProvider American Chemical Society
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB5BOQAHBIXCQlsM4sAltE782BxRtdUC7QrBgvYW2bFTrYSSap0euPDbmXGy6VbqIzcrk8TyjD3fZOxvAD4o9BKCa5OI3GcJEXIlVugssWrs8cpzWdEP_dOZmv4SXxdy0dPk0FkY7ETAN4WYxL9kF-AHPkgqlqT8fXiAIESQBc_-fRpWXYTS43W1gjxTizWL0Oaj5IHKcNUD3QAro3s5fgpPelzIPneKfAb3fL0NjzfYArdhZ3J5KA1F-1kZnkPzfUXpFlq42KR2TUkn-tic-DPqM7asGYI8lvLQsqPOxbC4UYDu_F62q4ahjszfwJqKTQK20aYYwkl_jvE4-7k8I6yO4j-67bQ-vID58WR-NE36QgqJwfCtTRAVOCMPuXdUJEhgg4CRNsK5MjNZZa3KueVmnCvrqxK1ZpUkZrs81dK7bAe26qb2r4Dhuiq8FsJ5VwqeVtZTkGsqqVNXlTwdwT6OcNHPg1DEFHfKi0EFI_i4Hvyi7FnIqRjGn-tE3w-i5x31xnVCu2sNbnxVSsqf6lyO4N1wG-cNJUNM7ZuLKMPVIYKx7DYZFSnt9PhmmTSiZFzX9AhedhY09BZDW0Wp69d3jcpbeDidn54UJ19m397AIwRlIm4ylLuw1a4u_B4Cn9buR4v_D0sn_IM
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB5BkRAcUCkUFtpiEAcugTrxY31E7a7Ka1XBgvYWObFTrYSS1To9cOG3M-Nk00VqITcrk8TyjD3fZOxvAF4r9BKCa5sI47OECLmSQugsKdTY42WMrOiH_peZOvsuPi7kog8U6SwMdiLgm0JM4tOsXrmqZxjg73yQVDBJ-dtwB4GIISue_X47rLwIp8ebigUmU4sNk9D2o-SFyvC3F7oBWkYXM92FBz02ZO87ZT6EW77eg_tbjIF7sD-5OpiGov3MDI-gOV9TyoUWLzapXVPSqT42Jw6N-oIta4ZAj6U8tOykczMsbhagOz-W7bphqCf7K7CmYpOAbbQrhpDSrzAmZ9-WF4TXUfxrt6XWh8cwn07mJ2dJX0whsRjCtQkiA2flMfeOCgUJbBA40lY4V2Y2q4pCGV5wOzaq8FWJmiuUJHY7k2rpXbYPO3VT-6fAcG0VXgvhvCsFT6vCU6BrK6lTV5U8HcERjnDez4WQxzR3yvNBBSN4sxn8vOyZyKkgxs_rRF8NoquOfuM6oYONBre-KiXlULWRI3g53Ma5QwkRW_vmMspwdYyALPuXjIq0dnp8s0wakTKubXoETzoLGnqL4a2i9PWz_43KC7h7fjrNP3-YfXoO9xCXibjPUB7ATru-9IeIfdriKBr8Hw8X_Zk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictive+Endocrine+Testing+in+the+21st+Century+Using+in+Vitro+Assays+of+Estrogen+Receptor+Signaling+Responses&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=Rotroff%2C+Daniel+M&rft.au=Martin%2C+Matt+T&rft.au=Dix%2C+David+J&rft.au=Filer%2C+Dayne+L&rft.date=2014-08-05&rft.pub=American+Chemical+Society&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=8706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Fes502676e&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3401118911
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon