Predictive Endocrine Testing in the 21st Century Using in Vitro Assays of Estrogen Receptor Signaling Responses
Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals incl...
Saved in:
Published in | Environmental science & technology Vol. 48; no. 15; pp. 8706 - 8716 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
05.08.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0013-936X 1520-5851 1520-5851 |
DOI | 10.1021/es502676e |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERx-agr-x/ER beta selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERx-agr-x/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization.Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays have emerged as a potential tool for prioritizing chemicals for ED-related whole-animal tests. In this study, 1814 chemicals including pesticide active and inert ingredients, industrial chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceuticals were evaluated in a panel of 13 in vitro HTS assays. The panel of in vitro assays interrogated multiple end points related to estrogen receptor (ER) signaling, namely binding, agonist, antagonist, and cell growth responses. The results from the in vitro assays were used to create an ER Interaction Score. For 36 reference chemicals, an ER Interaction Score >0 showed 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for classifying potential ER activity. The magnitude of the ER Interaction Score was significantly related to the potency classification of the reference chemicals (p < 0.0001). ERα/ERβ selectivity was also evaluated, but relatively few chemicals showed significant selectivity for a specific isoform. When applied to a broader set of chemicals with in vivo uterotrophic data, the ER Interaction Scores showed 91% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Overall, this study provides a novel method for combining in vitro concentration response data from multiple assays and, when applied to a large set of ER data, accurately predicted estrogenic responses and demonstrated its utility for chemical prioritization. |
Author | Rotroff, Daniel M Filer, Dayne L Knudsen, Thomas B Dix, David J Reif, David M Xia, Menghang Huang, Ruili Martin, Matt T Judson, Richard S Houck, Keith A Sipes, Nisha S |
AuthorAffiliation | University of North Carolina Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering – name: University of North Carolina – name: National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel M surname: Rotroff fullname: Rotroff, Daniel M – sequence: 2 givenname: Matt T surname: Martin fullname: Martin, Matt T – sequence: 3 givenname: David J surname: Dix fullname: Dix, David J – sequence: 4 givenname: Dayne L surname: Filer fullname: Filer, Dayne L – sequence: 5 givenname: Keith A surname: Houck fullname: Houck, Keith A – sequence: 6 givenname: Thomas B surname: Knudsen fullname: Knudsen, Thomas B – sequence: 7 givenname: Nisha S surname: Sipes fullname: Sipes, Nisha S – sequence: 8 givenname: David M surname: Reif fullname: Reif, David M – sequence: 9 givenname: Menghang surname: Xia fullname: Xia, Menghang – sequence: 10 givenname: Ruili surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Ruili – sequence: 11 givenname: Richard S surname: Judson fullname: Judson, Richard S email: judson.richard@epa.gov |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqN0lFrFDEQAOAgFXutPvgHJCBCfVg7SS7J5rEcZxUKSj3FtyW7O3um7CXXJCvcvzf1riJV0Kcw5JshM5kTcuSDR0KeM3jDgLNzTBK40gofkRmTHCpZS3ZEZgBMVEaor8fkJKUbAOAC6ifkmM-NAl7DjISPEXvXZfcd6dL3oYvOI11hys6vqfM0f0PKWcp0gT5PcUc_p8PNF5djoBcp2V2iYaDLVOI1enqNHW5ziPSTW3s73vFrTNvgE6an5PFgx4TPDucpWb1drhbvqqsPl-8XF1eVnYPJlZbQWwkMeykFzEvAWS20nfd9J6wY2lYZ1jJbG9Xi0BkUrZK8lsZwLbEXp-RsX3Ybw-1Uumk2LnU4jtZjmFLDyyyYAab1PymTqoxRaV3_B5VMgdFKFPryAb0JUyzT-Kl4bUAbWdSLg5raDfbNNrqNjbvm_n8KON-DLoaUIg5N57LNLvgcrRsbBs3dBjS_NqBkvH6QcV_0b_bV3tou_fa-P9wP-5q6pw |
CODEN | ESTHAG |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_10408444_2017_1289150 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2021_127800 crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfw026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tiv_2016_09_008 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_21723 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2018_10_194 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2024_135351 crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP2589 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00204_016_1824_6 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrestox_5b00358 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_estlett_5b00220 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cplett_2018_06_022 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408444_2016_1272095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2020_113962 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_toxlet_2018_07_011 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_1c01339 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_08_175 crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfv168 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tox_2016_09_014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00204_015_1568_8 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_orglett_8b02929 crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP1122 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_01_340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2018_12_007 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b02273 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2015_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_reprotox_2014_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1089_adt_2021_059 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0177902 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2015_1126547 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygcen_2019_113325 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2016_00092 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_9b01543 crossref_primary_10_1289_EHP9297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2022_113330 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2015_83 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_etap_2017_05_015 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_1c01228 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408444_2016_1193722 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2022_116206 crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfy187 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrestox_6b00037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2019_114774 crossref_primary_10_1002_etc_5771 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88675_w crossref_primary_10_1111_ina_12607 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms16011008 crossref_primary_10_1159_000442748 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2015_08_093 crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1510352 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_170603 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_7b04832 crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfx085 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2025_137167 crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfw152 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2015_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13321_018_0300_0 crossref_primary_10_1089_scd_2014_0531 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrestox_5b00342 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_8258 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2018_05_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_talanta_2017_07_068 crossref_primary_10_1021_cr500319v crossref_primary_10_1289_ehp_1510183 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/jn/135.11.2687 10.1038/nrendo.2010.87 10.1289/ehp.5686 10.1210/endo.138.3.4979 10.1021/tx400117y 10.1677/joe.0.1520159 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.07.005 10.1016/j.mce.2006.08.008 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00437-1 10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370 10.1006/rtph.1997.1100 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.011 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5936 10.1002/etc.1825 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)38923-2 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.007 10.1126/science.277.5331.1508 10.1289/ehp.1205065 10.1371/journal.pone.0029835 10.1677/joe.0.1630379 10.1016/j.taap.2010.05.017 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 5, 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society – notice: Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 5, 2014 |
DBID | N~. AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7ST 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1021/es502676e |
DatabaseName | American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Engineering Research Database Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Environment Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: N~. name: American Chemical Society (ACS) Open Access url: https://pubs.acs.org sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1520-5851 |
EndPage | 8716 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3401118911 24960280 10_1021_es502676e b154557598 |
Genre | Journal Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | - .K2 1AW 3R3 4.4 4R4 53G 55A 5GY 5VS 63O 7~N 85S AABXI ABFLS ABMVS ABOGM ABPPZ ABPTK ABUCX ABUFD ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACJ ACPRK ACS AEESW AENEX AFEFF AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQSVZ BAANH BKOMP CS3 DZ EBS ED ED~ EJD F5P GNL IH9 JG JG~ K2 LG6 MS N~. PQEST PQQKQ ROL RXW TN5 TWZ U5U UHB UI2 UKR UPT VF5 VG9 VQA W1F WH7 X XFK XZL YZZ --- -DZ -~X ..I .DC 6TJ AAHBH AAYXX ABBLG ABJNI ABLBI ABQRX ADHLV ADUKH AGXLV AHGAQ CITATION CUPRZ GGK MS~ MW2 XSW ZCA .HR 186 1WB 42X 8WZ A6W AAYOK ABHMW ABTAH ACKIV ACRPL ADMHC ADNMO AETEA AEYZD ANPPW ANTXH CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IHE MVM NHB NPM OHT RNS TAE UBC UBX UBY UQL VJK VOH YV5 ZCG ZY4 ~A~ 7QO 7ST 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-750da501ed553040da21837a4ddc3a3fbb691b1a896befc9e3b6528599275ed3 |
IEDL.DBID | N~. |
ISSN | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 08:08:30 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:45:12 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:27:43 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 29 15:24:10 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:34 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 12:05:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:39 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 27 13:42:06 EDT 2020 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 15 |
Language | English |
License | http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a409t-750da501ed553040da21837a4ddc3a3fbb691b1a896befc9e3b6528599275ed3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502676e |
PMID | 24960280 |
PQID | 1552890795 |
PQPubID | 45412 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2000190177 proquest_miscellaneous_1560136778 proquest_miscellaneous_1551609763 proquest_journals_1552890795 pubmed_primary_24960280 crossref_citationtrail_10_1021_es502676e crossref_primary_10_1021_es502676e acs_journals_10_1021_es502676e |
ProviderPackageCode | JG~ 55A AABXI GNL VF5 7~N ACJ VG9 W1F ACS AEESW AFEFF .K2 ABMVS ABUCX IH9 BAANH AQSVZ ED~ N~. UI2 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-08-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-08-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2014 text: 2014-08-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Easton |
PublicationTitle | Environmental science & technology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Environ. Sci. Technol |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | American Chemical Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Chemical Society |
References | Pravettoni A. (ref14/cit14) 2007; 263 ref18/cit18 Cooper R. L. (ref6/cit6) 1997; 152 Bigsby R. (ref7/cit7) 1999; 107 Rotroff D. M. (ref17/cit17) 2013; 26 Mahoney M. M. (ref9/cit9) 2010; 247 Soto A. M. (ref4/cit4) 2010; 6 ref32/cit32 Totta P. (ref28/cit28) 2005; 135 Odum J. (ref25/cit25) 1997; 25 Weihua Z. (ref31/cit31) 2000; 97 ref20/cit20 Benjamini Y. (ref21/cit21) 1995 Caldwell D. J. (ref26/cit26) 2012; 31 Birnbaum L. S. (ref3/cit3) 2003; 111 Nelson E. R. (ref5/cit5) 2013; 53 ref10/cit10 ref19/cit19 Paech K. (ref23/cit23) 1997; 277 Dutertre M. (ref16/cit16) 2000; 295 Rotroff D. M. (ref22/cit22) 2013; 121 Kolasa A. (ref11/cit11) 2003; 62 Roberge M. (ref30/cit30) 2004; 154 Saunders P. T. (ref12/cit12) 2002; 87 Kavlock R. J. (ref8/cit8) 1996; 104 Gustafsson J. A. (ref13/cit13) 1999; 163 ref24/cit24 Gutendorf B. (ref27/cit27) 2001; 166 Cui J. (ref2/cit2) 2013; 19 Kuiper G. G. J. M. (ref15/cit15) 1997; 138 Couse J. F. (ref1/cit1) 1999; 20 Zhang C.-Y. (ref29/cit29) 2012; 7 |
References_xml | – volume: 135 start-page: 2687 year: 2005 ident: ref28/cit28 publication-title: J. Nutr. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.11.2687 – ident: ref20/cit20 – volume: 6 start-page: 363 year: 2010 ident: ref4/cit4 publication-title: Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.87 – volume: 111 start-page: 389 year: 2003 ident: ref3/cit3 publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5686 – volume: 138 start-page: 863 year: 1997 ident: ref15/cit15 publication-title: Endocrinology doi: 10.1210/endo.138.3.4979 – ident: ref32/cit32 – volume: 26 start-page: 1097 year: 2013 ident: ref17/cit17 publication-title: Chem. Res. Toxicol. doi: 10.1021/tx400117y – volume: 152 start-page: 159 year: 1997 ident: ref6/cit6 publication-title: J. Endocrinol. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1520159 – ident: ref24/cit24 – volume: 154 start-page: 61 year: 2004 ident: ref30/cit30 publication-title: Toxicol. Lett. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.07.005 – ident: ref10/cit10 – volume: 263 start-page: 46 year: 2007 ident: ref14/cit14 publication-title: Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.08.008 – ident: ref18/cit18 – volume: 87 start-page: 2706 year: 2002 ident: ref12/cit12 publication-title: J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. – ident: ref19/cit19 – volume: 166 start-page: 79 year: 2001 ident: ref27/cit27 publication-title: Toxicology doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00437-1 – volume: 20 start-page: 358 year: 1999 ident: ref1/cit1 publication-title: Endocr. Rev. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370 – volume: 25 start-page: 176 year: 1997 ident: ref25/cit25 publication-title: Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. RTP doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1100 – volume: 104 start-page: 715 year: 1996 ident: ref8/cit8 publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect. – volume: 62 start-page: 467 year: 2003 ident: ref11/cit11 publication-title: Folia Morphol. – volume: 53 start-page: 42 year: 2013 ident: ref5/cit5 publication-title: Bone doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.011 – volume: 97 start-page: 5936 year: 2000 ident: ref31/cit31 publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5936 – volume: 107 start-page: 613 year: 1999 ident: ref7/cit7 publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect. – volume: 31 start-page: 1396 year: 2012 ident: ref26/cit26 publication-title: Environ. Toxicol. Chem. doi: 10.1002/etc.1825 – volume: 295 start-page: 431 year: 2000 ident: ref16/cit16 publication-title: J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)38923-2 – start-page: 289 year: 1995 ident: ref21/cit21 publication-title: J. R. Statist. Soc. B doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x – volume: 19 start-page: 197 year: 2013 ident: ref2/cit2 publication-title: Trends Mol. Med. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.007 – volume: 277 start-page: 1508 year: 1997 ident: ref23/cit23 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1508 – volume: 121 start-page: 7 year: 2013 ident: ref22/cit22 publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205065 – volume: 7 start-page: e29835 year: 2012 ident: ref29/cit29 publication-title: PloS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029835 – volume: 163 start-page: 379 year: 1999 ident: ref13/cit13 publication-title: J. Endocrinol. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1630379 – volume: 247 start-page: 98 year: 2010 ident: ref9/cit9 publication-title: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.05.017 |
SSID | ssj0002308 |
Score | 2.4158006 |
Snippet | Thousands of environmental chemicals are subject to regulatory review for their potential to be endocrine disruptors (ED). In vitro high-throughput screening... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref acs |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 8706 |
SubjectTerms | agonists Algorithms Animals antagonists Biological Assay cell growth Chemicals drugs Endocrine Disruptors - analysis Endocrine system endocrine-disrupting chemicals Estrogen Antagonists - analysis Estrogen Receptor alpha - agonists Estrogen Receptor alpha - antagonists & inhibitors Estrogen Receptor beta - agonists Estrogen Receptor beta - antagonists & inhibitors estrogen receptors Estrogens Estrogens - analysis Food additives High-Throughput Screening Assays Humans in vitro studies inert ingredients MCF-7 Cells Models, Chemical Pesticides prioritization screening Sensitivity analysis Signal Transduction |
Title | Predictive Endocrine Testing in the 21st Century Using in Vitro Assays of Estrogen Receptor Signaling Responses |
URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502676e https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960280 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1552890795 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1551609763 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1560136778 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000190177 |
Volume | 48 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9swDCa69LIdiq5bt3RpoD0Ou3irZD3sYxGkKAq0GNZsyC2QLLkIMNhF7B566W8faTteCjSrb4I_w4ZIkR9NiQT4otFLSG5sJNMQR1SQK3LSxJHTScArTVVOP_Qvr_T5L3kxV_Md-Lwlgy_491Ap6pKkwwvYFToxpLpXD996c4scOlm3KUhjPV-XD9p8lFxPVj12PVv4ZONXzvZhryOE7LSV4GvYCcUBvNooE3gAh9N_p9EQ2i3H6g2UP1aUZyGLxaaFLzM6ysdmVDijuGHLgiG7Y4JXNZu0voU1OwTozu9lvSoZCsfeV6zM2bTCMSoTQx4ZbjEQZ9fLGyLpCP_Z7qMN1VuYnU1nk_Oo66AQWYzb6gjpgLfqhAdP3YEkDogRGSu9z2Ib587plDtuk1S7kGcoLqcVlbRLhVHBx4cwKMoivAeGBlUGI6UPPpNc5C5QdGtzZYTPMy6GMMYZXnQLoFo0uW3BF70IhvB1PfmLrCs_Tl0w_jwF_dRDb9uaG0-BRmsJbrxVKUqcmlQN4WN_GxcMZUFsEcq7BsP1CbKw-H8Y3dSyM8l2jGjoMRo0M4R3rQb1X4sxraac9dFzs_IBXiIDk82OQjWCQb26C8fIcmo3RpY_uR43uv4XczX31g |
linkProvider | American Chemical Society |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB5BOQAHBIXCQlsM4sAltE782BxRtdUC7QrBgvYW2bFTrYSSap0euPDbmXGy6VbqIzcrk8TyjD3fZOxvAD4o9BKCa5OI3GcJEXIlVugssWrs8cpzWdEP_dOZmv4SXxdy0dPk0FkY7ETAN4WYxL9kF-AHPkgqlqT8fXiAIESQBc_-fRpWXYTS43W1gjxTizWL0Oaj5IHKcNUD3QAro3s5fgpPelzIPneKfAb3fL0NjzfYArdhZ3J5KA1F-1kZnkPzfUXpFlq42KR2TUkn-tic-DPqM7asGYI8lvLQsqPOxbC4UYDu_F62q4ahjszfwJqKTQK20aYYwkl_jvE4-7k8I6yO4j-67bQ-vID58WR-NE36QgqJwfCtTRAVOCMPuXdUJEhgg4CRNsK5MjNZZa3KueVmnCvrqxK1ZpUkZrs81dK7bAe26qb2r4Dhuiq8FsJ5VwqeVtZTkGsqqVNXlTwdwT6OcNHPg1DEFHfKi0EFI_i4Hvyi7FnIqRjGn-tE3w-i5x31xnVCu2sNbnxVSsqf6lyO4N1wG-cNJUNM7ZuLKMPVIYKx7DYZFSnt9PhmmTSiZFzX9AhedhY09BZDW0Wp69d3jcpbeDidn54UJ19m397AIwRlIm4ylLuw1a4u_B4Cn9buR4v_D0sn_IM |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB5BkRAcUCkUFtpiEAcugTrxY31E7a7Ka1XBgvYWObFTrYSS1To9cOG3M-Nk00VqITcrk8TyjD3fZOxvAF4r9BKCa5sI47OECLmSQugsKdTY42WMrOiH_peZOvsuPi7kog8U6SwMdiLgm0JM4tOsXrmqZxjg73yQVDBJ-dtwB4GIISue_X47rLwIp8ebigUmU4sNk9D2o-SFyvC3F7oBWkYXM92FBz02ZO87ZT6EW77eg_tbjIF7sD-5OpiGov3MDI-gOV9TyoUWLzapXVPSqT42Jw6N-oIta4ZAj6U8tOykczMsbhagOz-W7bphqCf7K7CmYpOAbbQrhpDSrzAmZ9-WF4TXUfxrt6XWh8cwn07mJ2dJX0whsRjCtQkiA2flMfeOCgUJbBA40lY4V2Y2q4pCGV5wOzaq8FWJmiuUJHY7k2rpXbYPO3VT-6fAcG0VXgvhvCsFT6vCU6BrK6lTV5U8HcERjnDez4WQxzR3yvNBBSN4sxn8vOyZyKkgxs_rRF8NoquOfuM6oYONBre-KiXlULWRI3g53Ma5QwkRW_vmMspwdYyALPuXjIq0dnp8s0wakTKubXoETzoLGnqL4a2i9PWz_43KC7h7fjrNP3-YfXoO9xCXibjPUB7ATru-9IeIfdriKBr8Hw8X_Zk |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictive+Endocrine+Testing+in+the+21st+Century+Using+in+Vitro+Assays+of+Estrogen+Receptor+Signaling+Responses&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=Rotroff%2C+Daniel+M&rft.au=Martin%2C+Matt+T&rft.au=Dix%2C+David+J&rft.au=Filer%2C+Dayne+L&rft.date=2014-08-05&rft.pub=American+Chemical+Society&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=8706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Fes502676e&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3401118911 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon |