Are researchers following best storage practices for measuring soil biochemical properties?
It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a la...
Saved in:
Published in | Soil Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 95 - 106 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Göttingen
Copernicus GmbH
26.04.2021
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of
carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts
taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it
is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack
of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate
grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in
soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or −20 ∘C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the
quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable
inorganic nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) and microbial
biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage
treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to
consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil
properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing
at −20 ∘C was least effective at maintaining measured values of
fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘C) soils for less than a
week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts
for less than a week for NH4+ and NO3- did not jeopardise
sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure
researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and
organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties
related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised
methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and
ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations
for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and
publish their findings. |
---|---|
AbstractList | It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of
carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts
taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it
is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack
of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate
grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in
soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or −20 ∘C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the
quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable
inorganic nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) and microbial
biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage
treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to
consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil
properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing
at −20 ∘C was least effective at maintaining measured values of
fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘C) soils for less than a
week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts
for less than a week for NH4+ and NO3- did not jeopardise
sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure
researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and
organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties
related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised
methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and
ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations
for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and
publish their findings. It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or − 20 ∘ C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable inorganic nitrogen (NH 4 + <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="8pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="43bba5feeea5818072376b211f2a452d"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00001.svg" width="8pt" height="15pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg> and NO 3 - <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="9pt" height="16pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="0723f17b5be9fc41c36a5585631feb47"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00002.svg" width="9pt" height="16pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg> ) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing at − 20 ∘ C was least effective at maintaining measured values of fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘ C) soils for less than a week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts for less than a week for NH 4 + <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="cc9fcbc3808c845ed7a1b90adb40bd46"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00003.svg" width="24pt" height="15pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00003.png"/></svg:svg> and NO 3 - <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="25pt" height="16pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="b3512ed4eb493ff037a5c39221523c47"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00004.svg" width="25pt" height="16pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00004.png"/></svg:svg> did not jeopardise sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and publish their findings. It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or -20 ∘C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable inorganic nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing at -20 ∘C was least effective at maintaining measured values of fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘C) soils for less than a week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts for less than a week for NH4+ and NO3- did not jeopardise sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and publish their findings. |
Author | Bardgett, Richard D. Cordero, Irene Lavallee, Jocelyn M. de Vries, Franciska T. Langridge, Holly Ashworth, Deborah Rhymes, Jennifer M. Straathof, Angela L. Johnson, David Chomel, Mathilde Semchenko, Marina |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jennifer M. orcidid: 0000-0001-9347-9863 surname: Rhymes fullname: Rhymes, Jennifer M. – sequence: 2 givenname: Irene orcidid: 0000-0002-6249-8348 surname: Cordero fullname: Cordero, Irene – sequence: 3 givenname: Mathilde surname: Chomel fullname: Chomel, Mathilde – sequence: 4 givenname: Jocelyn M. orcidid: 0000-0002-3028-7087 surname: Lavallee fullname: Lavallee, Jocelyn M. – sequence: 5 givenname: Angela L. surname: Straathof fullname: Straathof, Angela L. – sequence: 6 givenname: Deborah surname: Ashworth fullname: Ashworth, Deborah – sequence: 7 givenname: Holly surname: Langridge fullname: Langridge, Holly – sequence: 8 givenname: Marina surname: Semchenko fullname: Semchenko, Marina – sequence: 9 givenname: Franciska T. surname: de Vries fullname: de Vries, Franciska T. – sequence: 10 givenname: David surname: Johnson fullname: Johnson, David – sequence: 11 givenname: Richard D. surname: Bardgett fullname: Bardgett, Richard D. |
BookMark | eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMouH5cPRc8V5M0aZqTiPixIHhREDyEaTpZs3SbNeki_ntTV0QEL5NheN53JjMHZHcIAxJywuiZZFqcp-D7UpValpxytkNmnGldVrp53v2V75PjlJaUUlZLxriakZfLiEXEhBDtK8ZUuND34d0Pi6LFNBZpDBEWWKwj2NFbnIBYrBDSJk7Q1LdofcjilbfQZzCsMY4e08UR2XPQJzz-fg_J083149Vdef9wO7-6vC-h0vWYoxR1A5rVTKlaNkq2rgMtQKDrkPOqE0JZ6yrRAVOUNULmcqsa1bYSQVeHZL717QIszTr6FcQPE8Cbr0KICwN5ItujkZzXomKyxg6zKWjlgANrqVTOcTl5nW698j_eNnkDZhk2ccjjGy5ZQ4XiFc_U2ZayMaQU0f10ZdRM9zDTXowyWprpHlkg_gisH2H0YRgjZPIf2Sd8MJL2 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_02757540_2023_2253222 crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_367 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ad3565 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2023_116347 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2023_121909 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_estlett_2c00585 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41396_023_01512_y crossref_primary_10_5194_soil_11_247_2025 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00019-9 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012 10.2136/sssaj2013.0005br 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.021 10.1111/1365-2745.13160 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01971 10.2136/sssaj2000.6451638x 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.017 10.1007/BF00336262 10.1007/978-981-13-7264-3 10.1016/B978-012179726-3/50002-2 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.011 10.2134/jeq2008.0018br 10.1038/s41396-018-0089-x 10.1038/s41467-018-03798-5 10.1021/es0707198 10.1097/00010694-195903000-00001 10.1017/9780521391665 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90193-F 10.2136/sssaj2006.0245 10.3733/hilg.v57n03p019 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.016 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.01.013 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.04.023 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00077-X 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33 10.1016/B978-012513840-6/50018-5 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0 10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0017 10.1080/00103624.2012.639108 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.024 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.007 10.1080/00103620009370485 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 10.1111/2041-210X.13331 10.1007/BF00335816 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00125-9 10.1007/s003740050232 10.1023/A:1013072519889 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7UA ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W H96 HCIFZ L.G PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/soil-7-95-2021 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Water Resources Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 2199-398X 2199-3971 |
EndPage | 106 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259 10_5194_soil_7_95_2021 |
GroupedDBID | 2XV 5VS 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAYXX ADBBV AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BKSAR CCPQU CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HCIFZ IAG IAO IEA ISR ITC KQ8 LK5 M7R OK1 PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PROAC RKB 7UA ABUWG AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W H96 L.G PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-a35468a91617765875bfda94a4efde223d447ccf34da1701845de2b787bb5ea93 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2199-398X 2199-3971 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:10 EDT 2025 Fri Aug 01 10:50:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:46:10 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:06 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a396t-a35468a91617765875bfda94a4efde223d447ccf34da1701845de2b787bb5ea93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-3028-7087 0000-0001-9347-9863 0000-0002-6249-8348 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259 |
PQID | 2518047232 |
PQPubID | 2040561 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259 proquest_journals_2518047232 crossref_primary_10_5194_soil_7_95_2021 crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_soil_7_95_2021 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-04-26 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-26 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-04-26 day: 26 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Göttingen |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Göttingen |
PublicationTitle | Soil |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref10 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 |
References_xml | – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00019-9 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012 – ident: ref20 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2013.0005br – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.021 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13160 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01971 – ident: ref9 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6451638x – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.017 – ident: ref13 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1007/BF00336262 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-7264-3 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1016/B978-012179726-3/50002-2 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.011 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0018br – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0089-x – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03798-5 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1021/es0707198 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1097/00010694-195903000-00001 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1017/9780521391665 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90193-F – ident: ref30 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0245 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.3733/hilg.v57n03p019 – ident: ref33 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.016 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.01.013 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.04.023 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00077-X – ident: ref22 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1016/B978-012513840-6/50018-5 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0017 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1080/00103624.2012.639108 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.024 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.007 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1080/00103620009370485 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13331 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1007/BF00335816 – ident: ref8 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00125-9 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1007/s003740050232 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1023/A:1013072519889 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004 |
SSID | ssj0001651127 |
Score | 2.2176101 |
Snippet | It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of
carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts
taken... It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken... |
SourceID | doaj proquest crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 95 |
SubjectTerms | Best practice Biogeochemistry Biomass Carbon Case studies Dissolved organic carbon Ecological function Ecological research Freezing Grasslands Integrity Laboratories Loam soils Methods Microorganisms Nitrogen Nutrients Refrigeration Soil depth Soil properties Soil temperature Soil types Storage temperature Subsoils Temperature Topsoil |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NSwMxEA3aXvQgfmK1Sg6Cp1C6m2Q3p1KlpQgWEYWCh5BskiJot24r_n1ntqkiopc9ZIclO0lm3kySN4RcBCdkliSGFSI3EKBkghklHVMy5Cl4vCJkeBv5dixHj_xmIiYx4baIxyrXNrE21K4sMEfeAT-cI7NhmvTmbwyrRuHuaiyhsUmaYILzvEGaV4Px3f13lkUioMA707AyFUtVPlkxNwJw4Z1F-fzCcAcT5krS_eGZagL_X_a5djrDXbIT0SLtr4Z3j2z42T7Z7k-ryJjhD8hTv_I0UvYglqMBRrb8AI9ELXyR4ulHsBl0fR0KBSr6WqcGUQh7R-0zFs6qmQNAsJzjYWu_6B2Sx-Hg4XrEYsUEZlIll_AUXOZGYdCSgaYzYYMzihvug_OABBznWVGElDuDROw5F9BsYdFaK7xR6RFpzMqZPyYUsQDila4FB-4gUJbKFlI4YRPuEuNbhK21pYtIJ45VLV40hBWoXY3915lWQqN2W-TyS36-ItL4U_IKlf8lhQTYdUNZTXVcTxphI2AfIb3z8EtGZcEkpmsBfoYAIV2LtNdDp-OqXOjvOXTy_-tTsoU9wV2jRLZJY1m9-zMAH0t7HmfYJ_5u2WA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Are researchers following best storage practices for measuring soil biochemical properties? |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2518047232 https://doaj.org/article/522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259 |
Volume | 7 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PS8MwFA6iFz2IP3E6Rw6CpzLW5kdzkk02huAQcTDwEJImkcFcRzfx3_e9thsTES9eegiPNry85Ptek3yPkJvguJBxbKKMpwYSFMkjo4SLlAhpAoiXBYm3kR9HYjhmDxM-2Sr1hWfCKnngynFt5AcAclx455nMjJLBxKZjgWeEANwdV1_AvK1kqvy7IpBI4F1pmJEqAtDtVIqNQFhYe5lPZxHuXEKMxJ1viFQK9_9Yl0uwGRyRw5ol0m7Vu2Oy4-cn5KD7VtRKGf6UvHYLT2upHuRwNMCI5p-ARNTCGymeeoS1gq6vQaFBQd_LX4JohL2jdooFs0rFADDMF3jI2i_vzsh40H-5H0Z1pYTIJEqs4MmZSI3CZEWChyW3wRnFDPPBeWAAjoHvspAwZ1CAPWUcmi1MVmu5Nyo5J7vzfO4vCEUOgDylYwG4HSTIQtlMcMdtzFxsfINEa2_prJYRx2oWMw3pBHpXY_-11Ipr9G6D3G7sF5WAxq-WPXT-xgqFr8sGCAddh4P-KxwapLkeOl3PxqUGDpeiKmYSX_7HN67IPvYX95Ri0SS7q-LDXwM1WdkW2ev1R0_PrTIavwDv6-G4 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB1V20PhgKCAWGipD0WcrLKO7cQHVG2h1fZrhVArrcTB2LFdVSqbJbuo4k_xGzuTTVqhCm695JCMImc8mXlje94AbKegdC6E46UqHCYoueLO6MCNTkWGEa9MOVUjn4716FweTdRkBf50tTB0rLLziY2jDlVJa-Q7GIcLYjbMxO7sJ6euUbS72rXQWJrFcfx9jSnb_OPhZ5zfd0Ic7J99GvG2qwB3mdELvCqpC2cI2Oc4mlz5FJyRTsYUIkbLIGVelimTwRFZeSEV3vZo2N6r6Ih8CV3-qsz0B9GD1b398Zevd6s6mgAM1WijJzA8M8VkyRSJQEnuzKvLK047pmibYvBXJGwaBtyLB02QO3gKT1p0yoZLc3oGK3G6Do-HF3XL0BGfw7dhHVlLEUTYkSW0pOoaIyDz-EZGpy3RR7Gu_IoEavajWYokIRod85fUqKthKkDBakaHu-N89wWcP4guX0JvWk3jK2CEPQgfDTwChoCJuTa-1CooL2QQLvaBd9qyZUtfTl00riymMaRdS-O3uTXKknb78P5WfrYk7vin5B4p_1aKCLebG1V9Ydv_1xJMRayldAwRP8mZPDnhBh7hbkqYQvZho5s623qBub2z2df_f7wFa6Oz0xN7cjg-fgOPaFS0YyX0BvQW9a-4icBn4d-21sbg-0Mb-A1NfhY4 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1NbxMxEB1VqYTggPgUgQI-gDhZUby2d31AVUobtRSiClEpEgdjr-2qUsmGTVDFX-PXMbPxtkIIbr3ksBmtvLNvZ9744w3AqxSULoVwvFaVwwKlVNwZHbjRqSow49WppNPIH2f68FS-n6v5Fvzqz8LQtso-JnaBOjQ1zZGPMA9XpGxYiFHK2yJO9qe7y--cOkjRSmvfTmMDkeP48xLLt9Xbo31816-FmB58fnfIc4cB7gqj1_irpK6cIZJf4shK5VNwRjoZU4iYOYOUZV2nQgZHwuWVVHjZI8i9V9GREBOG_-2SqqIBbO8dzE4-Xc_waCIzdF4bo4LhhanmG9VIJE1ytGrOLzitniJOxfiPrNg1D_grN3QJb3oP7mamyiYbaN2Hrbh4AHcmZ21W64gP4cukjSzLBRGPZAlR1VxiNmQe78ho5yXGK9YfxSKDln3rpiXJiEbH_Dk17epUC9CwWdJG77jafQSnN-LLxzBYNIv4BBjxEOJKY4_kIWCRro2vtQrKCxmEi0PgvbdsnaXMqaPGhcWShrxrafy2tEZZ8u4Q3lzZLzciHv-03CPnX1mR-HZ3oWnPbP6WLVFW5F1KxxDxkZwpkxNu7JH6poTl5BB2-ldnc0RY2Wv8Pv3_3y_hFgLbfjiaHT-D2zQoWrwSegcG6_ZHfI4caO1fZLAx-HrT-P4NCosabQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are+researchers+following+best+storage+practices+for+measuring+soil+biochemical+properties%3F&rft.jtitle=Soil&rft.au=J.+M.+Rhymes&rft.au=J.+M.+Rhymes&rft.au=I.+Cordero&rft.au=M.+Chomel&rft.date=2021-04-26&rft.pub=Copernicus+Publications&rft.issn=2199-3971&rft.eissn=2199-398X&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=106&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Fsoil-7-95-2021&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2199-398X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2199-398X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2199-398X&client=summon |