Are researchers following best storage practices for measuring soil biochemical properties?

It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSoil Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 95 - 106
Main Authors Rhymes, Jennifer M., Cordero, Irene, Chomel, Mathilde, Lavallee, Jocelyn M., Straathof, Angela L., Ashworth, Deborah, Langridge, Holly, Semchenko, Marina, de Vries, Franciska T., Johnson, David, Bardgett, Richard D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Göttingen Copernicus GmbH 26.04.2021
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or −20 ∘C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable inorganic nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing at −20 ∘C was least effective at maintaining measured values of fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘C) soils for less than a week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts for less than a week for NH4+ and NO3- did not jeopardise sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and publish their findings.
AbstractList It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or −20 ∘C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable inorganic nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing at −20 ∘C was least effective at maintaining measured values of fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘C) soils for less than a week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts for less than a week for NH4+ and NO3- did not jeopardise sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and publish their findings.
It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or − 20  ∘ C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable inorganic nitrogen (NH 4 + <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="8pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="43bba5feeea5818072376b211f2a452d"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00001.svg" width="8pt" height="15pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg> and NO 3 - <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="9pt" height="16pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="0723f17b5be9fc41c36a5585631feb47"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00002.svg" width="9pt" height="16pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00002.png"/></svg:svg> ) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing at − 20  ∘ C was least effective at maintaining measured values of fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4  ∘ C) soils for less than a week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts for less than a week for NH 4 + <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="cc9fcbc3808c845ed7a1b90adb40bd46"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00003.svg" width="24pt" height="15pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00003.png"/></svg:svg> and NO 3 - <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="25pt" height="16pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="b3512ed4eb493ff037a5c39221523c47"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="soil-7-95-2021-ie00004.svg" width="25pt" height="16pt" src="soil-7-95-2021-ie00004.png"/></svg:svg> did not jeopardise sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and publish their findings.
It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken from fresh soil samples. However, this is often not possible, and it is common practice to store samples (soils and/or extracts), despite a lack of guidance on best practice. We utilised a case study on a temperate grassland soil taken from different depths to demonstrate how differences in soil and/or soil extract storage temperature (4 or -20 ∘C) and duration can influence sample integrity for the quantification of soil-dissolved organic C and N (DOC and DON), extractable inorganic nitrogen (NH4+ and NO3-) and microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN). The appropriateness of different storage treatments varied between topsoils and subsoils, highlighting the need to consider appropriate storage methods based on soil depth and soil properties. In general, we found that storing soils and extracts by freezing at -20 ∘C was least effective at maintaining measured values of fresh material, whilst refrigerating (4 ∘C) soils for less than a week for DOC and DON and up to a year for MBC and MBN and refrigerating soil extracts for less than a week for NH4+ and NO3- did not jeopardise sample integrity. We discuss and provide the appropriate tools to ensure researchers consider best storage practice methods when designing and organising ecological research involving assessments of soil properties related to C and N cycling. We encourage researchers to use standardised methods where possible and to report their storage treatment (i.e. temperature, duration) when publishing findings on aspects of soil and ecosystem functioning. In the absence of published storage recommendations for a given soil type, we encourage researchers to conduct a pilot study and publish their findings.
Author Bardgett, Richard D.
Cordero, Irene
Lavallee, Jocelyn M.
de Vries, Franciska T.
Langridge, Holly
Ashworth, Deborah
Rhymes, Jennifer M.
Straathof, Angela L.
Johnson, David
Chomel, Mathilde
Semchenko, Marina
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jennifer M.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9347-9863
  surname: Rhymes
  fullname: Rhymes, Jennifer M.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Irene
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6249-8348
  surname: Cordero
  fullname: Cordero, Irene
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mathilde
  surname: Chomel
  fullname: Chomel, Mathilde
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jocelyn M.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3028-7087
  surname: Lavallee
  fullname: Lavallee, Jocelyn M.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Angela L.
  surname: Straathof
  fullname: Straathof, Angela L.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Deborah
  surname: Ashworth
  fullname: Ashworth, Deborah
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Holly
  surname: Langridge
  fullname: Langridge, Holly
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Marina
  surname: Semchenko
  fullname: Semchenko, Marina
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Franciska T.
  surname: de Vries
  fullname: de Vries, Franciska T.
– sequence: 10
  givenname: David
  surname: Johnson
  fullname: Johnson, David
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Richard D.
  surname: Bardgett
  fullname: Bardgett, Richard D.
BookMark eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMouH5cPRc8V5M0aZqTiPixIHhREDyEaTpZs3SbNeki_ntTV0QEL5NheN53JjMHZHcIAxJywuiZZFqcp-D7UpValpxytkNmnGldVrp53v2V75PjlJaUUlZLxriakZfLiEXEhBDtK8ZUuND34d0Pi6LFNBZpDBEWWKwj2NFbnIBYrBDSJk7Q1LdofcjilbfQZzCsMY4e08UR2XPQJzz-fg_J083149Vdef9wO7-6vC-h0vWYoxR1A5rVTKlaNkq2rgMtQKDrkPOqE0JZ6yrRAVOUNULmcqsa1bYSQVeHZL717QIszTr6FcQPE8Cbr0KICwN5ItujkZzXomKyxg6zKWjlgANrqVTOcTl5nW698j_eNnkDZhk2ccjjGy5ZQ4XiFc_U2ZayMaQU0f10ZdRM9zDTXowyWprpHlkg_gisH2H0YRgjZPIf2Sd8MJL2
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_02757540_2023_2253222
crossref_primary_10_1002_edn3_367
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ad3565
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2023_116347
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2023_121909
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_estlett_2c00585
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41396_023_01512_y
crossref_primary_10_5194_soil_11_247_2025
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00019-9
10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012
10.2136/sssaj2013.0005br
10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.021
10.1111/1365-2745.13160
10.3389/fmicb.2018.01971
10.2136/sssaj2000.6451638x
10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.017
10.1007/BF00336262
10.1007/978-981-13-7264-3
10.1016/B978-012179726-3/50002-2
10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.011
10.2134/jeq2008.0018br
10.1038/s41396-018-0089-x
10.1038/s41467-018-03798-5
10.1021/es0707198
10.1097/00010694-195903000-00001
10.1017/9780521391665
10.1016/0038-0717(93)90193-F
10.2136/sssaj2006.0245
10.3733/hilg.v57n03p019
10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.016
10.1016/j.femsec.2005.01.013
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.04.023
10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00077-X
10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33
10.1016/B978-012513840-6/50018-5
10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0
10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0017
10.1080/00103624.2012.639108
10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8
10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.024
10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.007
10.1080/00103620009370485
10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
10.1111/2041-210X.13331
10.1007/BF00335816
10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00125-9
10.1007/s003740050232
10.1023/A:1013072519889
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7UA
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BHPHI
BKSAR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
F1W
H96
HCIFZ
L.G
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
DOA
DOI 10.5194/soil-7-95-2021
DatabaseName CrossRef
Water Resources Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
SciTech Premium Collection
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Sustainability
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 2199-398X
2199-3971
EndPage 106
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259
10_5194_soil_7_95_2021
GroupedDBID 2XV
5VS
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ADBBV
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
BKSAR
CCPQU
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HCIFZ
IAG
IAO
IEA
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK5
M7R
OK1
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PROAC
RKB
7UA
ABUWG
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
F1W
H96
L.G
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-a35468a91617765875bfda94a4efde223d447ccf34da1701845de2b787bb5ea93
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2199-398X
2199-3971
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:10 EDT 2025
Fri Aug 01 10:50:30 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:46:10 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:06 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a396t-a35468a91617765875bfda94a4efde223d447ccf34da1701845de2b787bb5ea93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-3028-7087
0000-0001-9347-9863
0000-0002-6249-8348
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259
PQID 2518047232
PQPubID 2040561
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259
proquest_journals_2518047232
crossref_primary_10_5194_soil_7_95_2021
crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_soil_7_95_2021
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-04-26
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-04-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-04-26
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Göttingen
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Göttingen
PublicationTitle Soil
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Copernicus GmbH
Copernicus Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Copernicus GmbH
– name: Copernicus Publications
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref11
ref10
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref41
ref44
ref43
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref39
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
References_xml – ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00019-9
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012
– ident: ref20
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.2136/sssaj2013.0005br
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.021
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13160
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01971
– ident: ref9
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6451638x
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.017
– ident: ref13
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1007/BF00336262
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-7264-3
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1016/B978-012179726-3/50002-2
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.011
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0018br
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0089-x
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03798-5
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1021/es0707198
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1097/00010694-195903000-00001
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1017/9780521391665
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90193-F
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0245
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.3733/hilg.v57n03p019
– ident: ref33
– ident: ref3
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.016
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.01.013
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.04.023
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00077-X
– ident: ref22
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1016/B978-012513840-6/50018-5
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0017
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1080/00103624.2012.639108
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.024
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.007
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1080/00103620009370485
– ident: ref28
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13331
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1007/BF00335816
– ident: ref8
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00125-9
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1007/s003740050232
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.1023/A:1013072519889
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004
SSID ssj0001651127
Score 2.2176101
Snippet It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken...
It is widely accepted that the measurement of organic and inorganic forms of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils should be performed on fresh extracts taken...
SourceID doaj
proquest
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 95
SubjectTerms Best practice
Biogeochemistry
Biomass
Carbon
Case studies
Dissolved organic carbon
Ecological function
Ecological research
Freezing
Grasslands
Integrity
Laboratories
Loam soils
Methods
Microorganisms
Nitrogen
Nutrients
Refrigeration
Soil depth
Soil properties
Soil temperature
Soil types
Storage temperature
Subsoils
Temperature
Topsoil
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NSwMxEA3aXvQgfmK1Sg6Cp1C6m2Q3p1KlpQgWEYWCh5BskiJot24r_n1ntqkiopc9ZIclO0lm3kySN4RcBCdkliSGFSI3EKBkghklHVMy5Cl4vCJkeBv5dixHj_xmIiYx4baIxyrXNrE21K4sMEfeAT-cI7NhmvTmbwyrRuHuaiyhsUmaYILzvEGaV4Px3f13lkUioMA707AyFUtVPlkxNwJw4Z1F-fzCcAcT5krS_eGZagL_X_a5djrDXbIT0SLtr4Z3j2z42T7Z7k-ryJjhD8hTv_I0UvYglqMBRrb8AI9ELXyR4ulHsBl0fR0KBSr6WqcGUQh7R-0zFs6qmQNAsJzjYWu_6B2Sx-Hg4XrEYsUEZlIll_AUXOZGYdCSgaYzYYMzihvug_OABBznWVGElDuDROw5F9BsYdFaK7xR6RFpzMqZPyYUsQDila4FB-4gUJbKFlI4YRPuEuNbhK21pYtIJ45VLV40hBWoXY3915lWQqN2W-TyS36-ItL4U_IKlf8lhQTYdUNZTXVcTxphI2AfIb3z8EtGZcEkpmsBfoYAIV2LtNdDp-OqXOjvOXTy_-tTsoU9wV2jRLZJY1m9-zMAH0t7HmfYJ_5u2WA
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Are researchers following best storage practices for measuring soil biochemical properties?
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2518047232
https://doaj.org/article/522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259
Volume 7
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PS8MwFA6iFz2IP3E6Rw6CpzLW5kdzkk02huAQcTDwEJImkcFcRzfx3_e9thsTES9eegiPNry85Ptek3yPkJvguJBxbKKMpwYSFMkjo4SLlAhpAoiXBYm3kR9HYjhmDxM-2Sr1hWfCKnngynFt5AcAclx455nMjJLBxKZjgWeEANwdV1_AvK1kqvy7IpBI4F1pmJEqAtDtVIqNQFhYe5lPZxHuXEKMxJ1viFQK9_9Yl0uwGRyRw5ol0m7Vu2Oy4-cn5KD7VtRKGf6UvHYLT2upHuRwNMCI5p-ARNTCGymeeoS1gq6vQaFBQd_LX4JohL2jdooFs0rFADDMF3jI2i_vzsh40H-5H0Z1pYTIJEqs4MmZSI3CZEWChyW3wRnFDPPBeWAAjoHvspAwZ1CAPWUcmi1MVmu5Nyo5J7vzfO4vCEUOgDylYwG4HSTIQtlMcMdtzFxsfINEa2_prJYRx2oWMw3pBHpXY_-11Ipr9G6D3G7sF5WAxq-WPXT-xgqFr8sGCAddh4P-KxwapLkeOl3PxqUGDpeiKmYSX_7HN67IPvYX95Ri0SS7q-LDXwM1WdkW2ev1R0_PrTIavwDv6-G4
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB1V20PhgKCAWGipD0WcrLKO7cQHVG2h1fZrhVArrcTB2LFdVSqbJbuo4k_xGzuTTVqhCm695JCMImc8mXlje94AbKegdC6E46UqHCYoueLO6MCNTkWGEa9MOVUjn4716FweTdRkBf50tTB0rLLziY2jDlVJa-Q7GIcLYjbMxO7sJ6euUbS72rXQWJrFcfx9jSnb_OPhZ5zfd0Ic7J99GvG2qwB3mdELvCqpC2cI2Oc4mlz5FJyRTsYUIkbLIGVelimTwRFZeSEV3vZo2N6r6Ih8CV3-qsz0B9GD1b398Zevd6s6mgAM1WijJzA8M8VkyRSJQEnuzKvLK047pmibYvBXJGwaBtyLB02QO3gKT1p0yoZLc3oGK3G6Do-HF3XL0BGfw7dhHVlLEUTYkSW0pOoaIyDz-EZGpy3RR7Gu_IoEavajWYokIRod85fUqKthKkDBakaHu-N89wWcP4guX0JvWk3jK2CEPQgfDTwChoCJuTa-1CooL2QQLvaBd9qyZUtfTl00riymMaRdS-O3uTXKknb78P5WfrYk7vin5B4p_1aKCLebG1V9Ydv_1xJMRayldAwRP8mZPDnhBh7hbkqYQvZho5s623qBub2z2df_f7wFa6Oz0xN7cjg-fgOPaFS0YyX0BvQW9a-4icBn4d-21sbg-0Mb-A1NfhY4
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1NbxMxEB1VqYTggPgUgQI-gDhZUby2d31AVUobtRSiClEpEgdjr-2qUsmGTVDFX-PXMbPxtkIIbr3ksBmtvLNvZ9744w3AqxSULoVwvFaVwwKlVNwZHbjRqSow49WppNPIH2f68FS-n6v5Fvzqz8LQtso-JnaBOjQ1zZGPMA9XpGxYiFHK2yJO9qe7y--cOkjRSmvfTmMDkeP48xLLt9Xbo31816-FmB58fnfIc4cB7gqj1_irpK6cIZJf4shK5VNwRjoZU4iYOYOUZV2nQgZHwuWVVHjZI8i9V9GREBOG_-2SqqIBbO8dzE4-Xc_waCIzdF4bo4LhhanmG9VIJE1ytGrOLzitniJOxfiPrNg1D_grN3QJb3oP7mamyiYbaN2Hrbh4AHcmZ21W64gP4cukjSzLBRGPZAlR1VxiNmQe78ho5yXGK9YfxSKDln3rpiXJiEbH_Dk17epUC9CwWdJG77jafQSnN-LLxzBYNIv4BBjxEOJKY4_kIWCRro2vtQrKCxmEi0PgvbdsnaXMqaPGhcWShrxrafy2tEZZ8u4Q3lzZLzciHv-03CPnX1mR-HZ3oWnPbP6WLVFW5F1KxxDxkZwpkxNu7JH6poTl5BB2-ldnc0RY2Wv8Pv3_3y_hFgLbfjiaHT-D2zQoWrwSegcG6_ZHfI4caO1fZLAx-HrT-P4NCosabQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are+researchers+following+best+storage+practices+for+measuring+soil+biochemical+properties%3F&rft.jtitle=Soil&rft.au=J.+M.+Rhymes&rft.au=J.+M.+Rhymes&rft.au=I.+Cordero&rft.au=M.+Chomel&rft.date=2021-04-26&rft.pub=Copernicus+Publications&rft.issn=2199-3971&rft.eissn=2199-398X&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=106&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Fsoil-7-95-2021&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_522643156ede47ca97fa2a1b057ff259
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2199-398X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2199-398X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2199-398X&client=summon