Distribution of Earthquakes on a Branching Fault System Using Integer Programming and Greedy‐Sequential Methods
A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this applicati...
Saved in:
Published in | Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 Vol. 21; no. 9 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.09.2020
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data.
Plain Language Summary
The possibility of earthquake ruptures involving multiple faults can significantly influence earthquake hazard estimates. For example, a large magnitude earthquake rupture can branch off a main fault onto a short fault that might not have been considered a significant hazard if the faults were assumed to be unconnected. We apply a method termed integer programming, originally developed from the disparate field of operations research, to determine the optimal spatial arrangement and distribution of large earthquakes on complex fault systems that include branching ruptures. The advantage of this method is that it finds the optimal solution for the entire study region, rather than finding locally optimal solutions. Solutions are constrained by the measured and inferred slip rates on faults from paleoseismic studies and geodetic data. The complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area is used as a test case for this new method, and results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method that has previously een developed for complex fault systems. Numerical experiments using both the integer programming and greedy‐sequential methods reveal differences on which branching faults are activated during multifault ruptures, depending on how strictly the model tries to fit a target slip rate with large uncertainty.
Key Points
An integer programming method is developed to determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on a fault system with branching faults
Results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method—a local optimization algorithm previously developed for complex fault systems
Application of these methods to San Francisco Bay Area faults indicate which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures |
---|---|
AbstractList | A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data.
Plain Language Summary
The possibility of earthquake ruptures involving multiple faults can significantly influence earthquake hazard estimates. For example, a large magnitude earthquake rupture can branch off a main fault onto a short fault that might not have been considered a significant hazard if the faults were assumed to be unconnected. We apply a method termed integer programming, originally developed from the disparate field of operations research, to determine the optimal spatial arrangement and distribution of large earthquakes on complex fault systems that include branching ruptures. The advantage of this method is that it finds the optimal solution for the entire study region, rather than finding locally optimal solutions. Solutions are constrained by the measured and inferred slip rates on faults from paleoseismic studies and geodetic data. The complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area is used as a test case for this new method, and results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method that has previously een developed for complex fault systems. Numerical experiments using both the integer programming and greedy‐sequential methods reveal differences on which branching faults are activated during multifault ruptures, depending on how strictly the model tries to fit a target slip rate with large uncertainty.
Key Points
An integer programming method is developed to determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on a fault system with branching faults
Results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method—a local optimization algorithm previously developed for complex fault systems
Application of these methods to San Francisco Bay Area faults indicate which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures Abstract A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data. A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data. The possibility of earthquake ruptures involving multiple faults can significantly influence earthquake hazard estimates. For example, a large magnitude earthquake rupture can branch off a main fault onto a short fault that might not have been considered a significant hazard if the faults were assumed to be unconnected. We apply a method termed integer programming, originally developed from the disparate field of operations research, to determine the optimal spatial arrangement and distribution of large earthquakes on complex fault systems that include branching ruptures. The advantage of this method is that it finds the optimal solution for the entire study region, rather than finding locally optimal solutions. Solutions are constrained by the measured and inferred slip rates on faults from paleoseismic studies and geodetic data. The complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area is used as a test case for this new method, and results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method that has previously een developed for complex fault systems. Numerical experiments using both the integer programming and greedy‐sequential methods reveal differences on which branching faults are activated during multifault ruptures, depending on how strictly the model tries to fit a target slip rate with large uncertainty. An integer programming method is developed to determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on a fault system with branching faults Results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method—a local optimization algorithm previously developed for complex fault systems Application of these methods to San Francisco Bay Area faults indicate which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data. |
Author | Geist, Eric L. Parsons, Tom |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eric L. orcidid: 0000-0003-0611-1150 surname: Geist fullname: Geist, Eric L. email: egeist@usgs.gov organization: U.S. Geological Survey – sequence: 2 givenname: Tom orcidid: 0000-0002-0582-4338 surname: Parsons fullname: Parsons, Tom organization: U.S. Geological Survey |
BookMark | eNp9kc1uEzEUhUeolegPOx7AElsCtmdsj5cQ0iFSK5BK19ad8Z3EYTJubI9QdjwCz9gnqdMgVCHBylefzj3XR-e8OBn9iEXxmtF3jHL9nlNOmzmltZbVi-KMCS5mmamTZ_PL4jzGDaWsEqI-K3afXEzBtVNyfiS-JwsIab2b4DtGkgmQjwHGbu3GFbmCaUjkdh8TbsldPKDlmHCFgXwNfhVguz0wGC1pAqLdP_z8dYu7CcfkYCA3mNbexsvitIch4qvf70Vxd7X4Nv88u_7SLOcfrmdQaslmVknd5SgAtZJCWqSlBbBtW7FeWtCaIbMclRa9BdkzaG1Nu1pzLDXtAMqLYnn0tR425j64LYS98eDME_BhZXJU1w1oWim6bMG4FX0lodNCCcwDp6VQqmTZ683R6z74nCcms_FTGPP3Da8qqWipKppVb4-qLvgYA_Z_rjJqDgWZ5wVlOf9L3rkEhx5SADf8a6k8Lv1wA-7_e8A0TbPgnCtWPgJWUKTT |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1029_2021JB022050 crossref_primary_10_5194_nhess_22_3607_2022 crossref_primary_10_1109_JSTARS_2022_3216998 crossref_primary_10_1785_0120220175 |
Cites_doi | 10.1785/0120010148 10.1785/0220120105 10.1093/gji/ggz294 10.1785/0120110349 10.1029/2009GL038295 10.1016/j.jsg.2009.10.007 10.1029/2000JB900254 10.1177/8755293019878199 10.1007/s10479-006-0091-y 10.3133/ofr20131165 10.1002/2014JB011765 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01594.x 10.1785/0120070111 10.1785/0120020014 10.1002/2015GL063575 10.1287/ijoc.13.2.96.10515 10.1029/2000GL011560 10.1029/2002JB002189 10.1785/0120090189 10.1785/BSSA0840041216 10.3133/ofr20071437E 10.1002/2014TC003561 10.1029/2008JB006173 10.1029/2007JB005027 10.1126/science.aam7194 10.1029/2019GL084741 10.1785/0120120322 10.1029/2001JB000572 10.1029/2000JB000061 10.1785/0120080069 10.1126/sciadv.1601441 10.1785/0120130180 10.1007/s11600-017-0020-2 10.3133/ofr20071437I 10.1029/2008JB006174 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.018 10.1029/2011GL047849 10.3133/fs20163020 10.1785/0120130164 10.1785/0120040601 10.1785/BSSA0840040974 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. 2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. – notice: 2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7TG 7TN F1W H96 KL. L.G DOA |
DOI | 10.1029/2020GC008964 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Oceanic Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Geology |
EISSN | 1525-2027 |
EndPage | n/a |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731 10_1029_2020GC008964 GGGE22271 |
Genre | article |
GeographicLocations | San Francisco Bay |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: San Francisco Bay |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: U.S. Geological Survey |
GroupedDBID | 05W 0R~ 1OC 24P 31~ 3V. 50Y 5GY 8-1 88I 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8G5 8R4 8R5 A00 AAESR AAHHS AANHP AAYCA AAZKR ABCUV ABUWG ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCMX ACGFS ACGOD ACPOU ACRPL ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIYS ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AEUYN AFBPY AFGKR AFKRA AFPWT AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN AZQEC AZVAB BDRZF BENPR BFHJK BHPHI BKSAR BMXJE BPHCQ BRXPI CCPQU CS3 D1J DCZOG DPXWK DRFUL DRSTM DU5 DWQXO EBS EJD FEDTE G-S GNUQQ GODZA GROUPED_DOAJ GUQSH HCIFZ HVGLF HZ~ LATKE LEEKS LITHE LK5 LOXES LUTES LYRES M2O M2P M7R MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM MY~ M~E O9- OK1 P-X P2W PCBAR PQQKQ PROAC Q2X R.K ROL SUPJJ UB1 WBKPD WYJ ZZTAW ~02 ~OA AAFWJ AAYXX AGQPQ CITATION PHGZM PHGZT 7TG 7TN AAMMB AEFGJ AFPKN AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY F1W H96 KL. L.G WIN |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a3961-d769c008aa87656de03daadbb41f6da991e1d2e795fda6f1abd80c892e390caa3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1525-2027 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:51 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 13:12:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:16:03 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:32 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:33:44 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a3961-d769c008aa87656de03daadbb41f6da991e1d2e795fda6f1abd80c892e390caa3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-0582-4338 0000-0003-0611-1150 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731 |
PQID | 2446703740 |
PQPubID | 54722 |
PageCount | 22 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731 proquest_journals_2446703740 crossref_primary_10_1029_2020GC008964 crossref_citationtrail_10_1029_2020GC008964 wiley_primary_10_1029_2020GC008964_GGGE22271 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | September 2020 2020-09-00 20200901 2020-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2020 text: September 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Washington |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington |
PublicationTitle | Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2012; 83 2010; 32 2000; 27 2007; 149 2012; 102 2010 2017; 65 2018; 123 2015; 120 1998 2010; 100 2008 2007 2020; 36 2008; 98 2003 2003; 93 2011; 38 2017; 356 2009; 114 1994; 84 2009; 99 2007; 112 2018; 111 2009; 36 2004; 94 2003; 108 2016; 2 2000; 105 2019; 46 2015; 42 2002; 107 2002; 148 2016 2002; 92 2019; 219 2013 2001; 13 2014; 104 2014; 33 e_1_2_9_31_1 e_1_2_9_35_1 e_1_2_9_12_1 e_1_2_9_33_1 Chen D.‐S. (e_1_2_9_10_1) 2010 e_1_2_9_14_1 e_1_2_9_39_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 e_1_2_9_37_1 e_1_2_9_18_1 Wolsey L. A. (e_1_2_9_52_1) 1998 e_1_2_9_41_1 e_1_2_9_20_1 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_45_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_43_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_4_1 e_1_2_9_2_1 Williams H. P. (e_1_2_9_50_1) 2013 e_1_2_9_26_1 e_1_2_9_49_1 e_1_2_9_28_1 e_1_2_9_30_1 e_1_2_9_53_1 e_1_2_9_51_1 e_1_2_9_11_1 e_1_2_9_34_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 Wells D. L. (e_1_2_9_47_1) 1994; 84 e_1_2_9_15_1 e_1_2_9_38_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_36_1 e_1_2_9_19_1 e_1_2_9_42_1 e_1_2_9_40_1 e_1_2_9_21_1 e_1_2_9_46_1 e_1_2_9_23_1 e_1_2_9_44_1 e_1_2_9_7_1 e_1_2_9_5_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 e_1_2_9_9_1 e_1_2_9_25_1 e_1_2_9_27_1 e_1_2_9_48_1 e_1_2_9_29_1 Parsons T. (e_1_2_9_32_1) 2018; 123 |
References_xml | – start-page: 66 year: 2013 – volume: 107 issue: B11 year: 2002 article-title: Dynamic shear rupture interactions with fault bends and off‐axis secondary faulting publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 13 start-page: 96 issue: 2 year: 2001 end-page: 103 article-title: Representations of the all_different predicate of constraint satisfaction in integer programming publication-title: INFORMS Journal on Computing – volume: 42 start-page: 2734 year: 2015 end-page: 2741 article-title: Potential for larger earthquakes in the East San Francisco Bay Area due to the direct connection between the Hayward and Calaveras faults publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters – volume: 149 start-page: 37 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 41 article-title: Progress in computational mixed integer programming—A look back from the other side of the tipping point publication-title: Annals of Operations Research – volume: 111 start-page: 244 year: 2018 end-page: 259 article-title: Determining on‐fault earthquake magnitude distributions from integer programming publication-title: Computers & Geosciences – volume: 114 year: 2009 article-title: Dynamic path selection along branched faults: Experiments involving sub‐Rayleigh and supershear ruptures publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – year: 2007 – volume: 120 start-page: 326 year: 2015 end-page: 343 article-title: Synthetic earthquake catalogs simulating seismic activity in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, fault system publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 123 start-page: 10,761 year: 2018 end-page: 10,784 article-title: Characteristic earthquake magnitude frequency distributions on faults calculated from consensus data in California publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 32 start-page: 118 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 126 article-title: The mechanics of first order splay faulting: The strike‐slip case publication-title: Journal of Structural Geology – year: 2003 – volume: 104 start-page: 1181 issue: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 1204 article-title: The UCERF3 grand inversion: Solving for the long‐term rate of ruptures in a fault system publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 84 start-page: 1216 year: 1994 end-page: 1228 article-title: A kinematic self‐similar rupture process for earthquakes publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 104 start-page: 1299 issue: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 1328 article-title: The earthquake cycle in the San Francisco Bay region: AD 1600–2012 publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 65 start-page: 243 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 257 article-title: A physics‐based earthquake simulator and its application to seismic hazard assessment in Calabria (Southern Italy) region publication-title: Acta Geophysica – volume: 219 start-page: 734 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 752 article-title: A combinatorial approach to determine earthquake magnitude distributions on a variable slip‐rate fault publication-title: Geophysical Journal International – year: 2016 – volume: 84 start-page: 974 year: 1994 end-page: 1002 article-title: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 99 start-page: 2012 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 2019 article-title: Is there a basis for preferring characteristic earthquakes over a Gutenberg‐Richter distribution in probabilistic earthquake forecasting? publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 94 start-page: S202 issue: 6B year: 2004 end-page: S213 article-title: Dynamic slip transfer from the Denali to Totschunda faults, Alaska: Testing theory for fault branching publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 36 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 41 article-title: The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications publication-title: Earthquake Spectra – start-page: 411 year: 2013 – volume: 100 start-page: 1971 issue: 5A year: 2010 end-page: 1988 article-title: Earthquake fault scaling: Self‐consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 104 start-page: 1122 issue: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 1180 article-title: Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time‐independent model publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 83 start-page: 983 issue: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 990 article-title: RSQSim earthquake simulator publication-title: Seismological Research Letters – volume: 112 year: 2007 article-title: Role of fault branches in earthquake rupture dynamics publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 38 year: 2011 article-title: Influence of material contrast on fault branching behavior publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters – volume: 33 start-page: 2025 year: 2014 end-page: 2044 article-title: Subsurface geometry of the San Andreas‐Calaveras fault junction: Influence of serpentinite and the Coast Range ophiolite publication-title: Tectonics – start-page: 264 year: 1998 – volume: 107 issue: B2 year: 2002 article-title: Three‐dimensional nonplanar simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 27 start-page: 3635 issue: 22 year: 2000 end-page: 3638 article-title: Selectivity of spontaneous rupture propagation on a branched fault publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters – volume: 36 year: 2009 article-title: Tsunamis and splay fault dynamics publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters – start-page: 469 year: 2010 – year: 2008 – volume: 105 start-page: 25543 issue: B11 year: 2000 end-page: 25552 article-title: Slip rates on San Francisco Bay area faults from anelastic deformation of the continental lithosphere publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 2 issue: 10 year: 2016 article-title: Missing link between the Hayward and Rodgers Creek faults publication-title: Science Advances – volume: 93 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 13 article-title: An empirical model for earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, 2002–2031 publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 356 issue: 6334 year: 2017 article-title: Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand publication-title: Science – volume: 46 start-page: 11859 year: 2019 end-page: 11867 article-title: The July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence: Kinematics of slip and stressing in cross‐fault ruptures publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters – volume: 148 start-page: 520 issue: 3 year: 2002 end-page: 541 article-title: Seismic moment distribution revisited: I. Statistical results publication-title: Geophysical Journal International – volume: 114 year: 2009 article-title: Finite element simulations of dynamic shear rupture experiments and dynamic path selection along kinked and branched faults publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 92 start-page: 1841 issue: 5 year: 2002 end-page: 1846 article-title: A bilinear source‐scaling model for M‐log A observations of continental earthquakes publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 98 start-page: 1609 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 1632 article-title: Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: Issues and implications for seismic‐hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – volume: 108 issue: B5 year: 2003 article-title: Effects of prestress state and rupture velocity on dynamic fault branching publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – volume: 102 start-page: 2667 issue: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 2676 article-title: Possible earthquake rupture connections on mapped California faults ranked by calculated Coulomb linking stress publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America – year: 2013 – ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 doi: 10.1785/0120010148 – ident: e_1_2_9_37_1 doi: 10.1785/0220120105 – ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz294 – ident: e_1_2_9_30_1 doi: 10.1785/0120110349 – ident: e_1_2_9_48_1 doi: 10.1029/2009GL038295 – start-page: 411 volume-title: Model building in mathematical programming year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_9_50_1 – start-page: 469 volume-title: Applied integer programming: Modeling and simulation year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_39_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2009.10.007 – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 doi: 10.1029/2000JB900254 – ident: e_1_2_9_34_1 doi: 10.1177/8755293019878199 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1007/s10479-006-0091-y – ident: e_1_2_9_46_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 doi: 10.3133/ofr20131165 – ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 doi: 10.1002/2014JB011765 – ident: e_1_2_9_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01594.x – ident: e_1_2_9_33_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_49_1 doi: 10.1785/0120070111 – ident: e_1_2_9_36_1 doi: 10.1785/0120020014 – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1002/2015GL063575 – ident: e_1_2_9_51_1 doi: 10.1287/ijoc.13.2.96.10515 – ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 doi: 10.1029/2000GL011560 – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1029/2002JB002189 – ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 doi: 10.1785/0120090189 – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.1785/BSSA0840041216 – ident: e_1_2_9_45_1 doi: 10.3133/ofr20071437E – ident: e_1_2_9_44_1 doi: 10.1002/2014TC003561 – ident: e_1_2_9_38_1 doi: 10.1029/2008JB006173 – ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 doi: 10.1029/2007JB005027 – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 doi: 10.1126/science.aam7194 – ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 doi: 10.1029/2019GL084741 – ident: e_1_2_9_40_1 doi: 10.1785/0120120322 – ident: e_1_2_9_35_1 doi: 10.1029/2001JB000572 – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1029/2000JB000061 – volume: 123 start-page: 10,761 year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_9_32_1 article-title: Characteristic earthquake magnitude frequency distributions on faults calculated from consensus data in California publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research – ident: e_1_2_9_31_1 doi: 10.1785/0120080069 – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_43_1 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601441 – ident: e_1_2_9_29_1 doi: 10.1785/0120130180 – ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s11600-017-0020-2 – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 doi: 10.3133/ofr20071437I – ident: e_1_2_9_42_1 doi: 10.1029/2008JB006174 – ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.018 – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 doi: 10.1029/2011GL047849 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 doi: 10.3133/fs20163020 – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.1785/0120130164 – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.1785/0120040601 – volume: 84 start-page: 974 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_9_47_1 article-title: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America doi: 10.1785/BSSA0840040974 – start-page: 264 volume-title: Integer programming year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_9_52_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_53_1 |
SSID | ssj0014558 |
Score | 2.335153 |
Snippet | A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming,... Abstract A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer... |
SourceID | doaj proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
SubjectTerms | Distribution earthquake forecast Earthquakes Fault lines Faults Geological hazards greedy‐sequential Integer programming Methods Numerical experiments Operations research Seismic activity Seismic hazard slip rates Uncertainty |
Title | Distribution of Earthquakes on a Branching Fault System Using Integer Programming and Greedy‐Sequential Methods |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029%2F2020GC008964 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2446703740 https://doaj.org/article/b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3LSsQwFA0yILgRnzg6Sha60mKb52Tp6ExFGBFUmF1JmlTBcdR5LGYjfoLf6Jd4k3ZkXKgbN6WEUG7vvW1OkpNzEdp3BTeOCBtRrUzEcuMiVTAS2cQw6xS1MrAJu5fi_JZd9HhvrtSX54SV8sCl446N4LkoABVYXjChcwX4wsENiSmXMpygJjDmzSZT1f4B47xZ0dxjovwMP05PYbhTgn0bgIJO_zdwOQ9RwxjTWUHLFTjEJ6VRq2jBDdbQYhqK707X0cuZV7mtClThpwK3wfz7l4l-cCMMLRq3fJkMv6aEO3rSH-NSjxwHXgD2i393boivSkrWo2_TA4s99cZOP97erwOtGj75Pu6GwtKjDXTbad-cnkdVyYRIUyWSCFyrcnhPreEvx4V1MbVaW2NYUgirAQy6xBInFS-sBrdqY5tx3lTEURXnWtNNVBs8DdwWwsILu0jDBHcFM0QqSR03lEmY1kqIRx0dzvyY5ZWeuC9r0c_CvjZR2bzX6-jgq_dzqaPxQ7-WD8lXH69-HRogJ7IqJ7K_cqKOGrOAZtUnOcoAxwjp1XbiOjoKQf7VkCxN07Y_KJxs_4dJO2jJP71kpzVQbTycuF2AM2OzFzIXrt3X9ieD9_AV |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution+of+Earthquakes+on+a+Branching+Fault+System+Using+Integer+Programming+and+Greedy%E2%80%90Sequential+Methods&rft.jtitle=Geochemistry%2C+geophysics%2C+geosystems+%3A+G3&rft.au=Geist%2C+Eric+L.&rft.au=Parsons%2C+Tom&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.issn=1525-2027&rft.eissn=1525-2027&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029%2F2020GC008964&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1029_2020GC008964 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1525-2027&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1525-2027&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1525-2027&client=summon |