Distribution of Earthquakes on a Branching Fault System Using Integer Programming and Greedy‐Sequential Methods

A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this applicati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 Vol. 21; no. 9
Main Authors Geist, Eric L., Parsons, Tom
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2020
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data. Plain Language Summary The possibility of earthquake ruptures involving multiple faults can significantly influence earthquake hazard estimates. For example, a large magnitude earthquake rupture can branch off a main fault onto a short fault that might not have been considered a significant hazard if the faults were assumed to be unconnected. We apply a method termed integer programming, originally developed from the disparate field of operations research, to determine the optimal spatial arrangement and distribution of large earthquakes on complex fault systems that include branching ruptures. The advantage of this method is that it finds the optimal solution for the entire study region, rather than finding locally optimal solutions. Solutions are constrained by the measured and inferred slip rates on faults from paleoseismic studies and geodetic data. The complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area is used as a test case for this new method, and results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method that has previously een developed for complex fault systems. Numerical experiments using both the integer programming and greedy‐sequential methods reveal differences on which branching faults are activated during multifault ruptures, depending on how strictly the model tries to fit a target slip rate with large uncertainty. Key Points An integer programming method is developed to determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on a fault system with branching faults Results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method—a local optimization algorithm previously developed for complex fault systems Application of these methods to San Francisco Bay Area faults indicate which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures
AbstractList A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data. Plain Language Summary The possibility of earthquake ruptures involving multiple faults can significantly influence earthquake hazard estimates. For example, a large magnitude earthquake rupture can branch off a main fault onto a short fault that might not have been considered a significant hazard if the faults were assumed to be unconnected. We apply a method termed integer programming, originally developed from the disparate field of operations research, to determine the optimal spatial arrangement and distribution of large earthquakes on complex fault systems that include branching ruptures. The advantage of this method is that it finds the optimal solution for the entire study region, rather than finding locally optimal solutions. Solutions are constrained by the measured and inferred slip rates on faults from paleoseismic studies and geodetic data. The complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area is used as a test case for this new method, and results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method that has previously een developed for complex fault systems. Numerical experiments using both the integer programming and greedy‐sequential methods reveal differences on which branching faults are activated during multifault ruptures, depending on how strictly the model tries to fit a target slip rate with large uncertainty. Key Points An integer programming method is developed to determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on a fault system with branching faults Results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method—a local optimization algorithm previously developed for complex fault systems Application of these methods to San Francisco Bay Area faults indicate which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures
Abstract A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data.
A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data. The possibility of earthquake ruptures involving multiple faults can significantly influence earthquake hazard estimates. For example, a large magnitude earthquake rupture can branch off a main fault onto a short fault that might not have been considered a significant hazard if the faults were assumed to be unconnected. We apply a method termed integer programming, originally developed from the disparate field of operations research, to determine the optimal spatial arrangement and distribution of large earthquakes on complex fault systems that include branching ruptures. The advantage of this method is that it finds the optimal solution for the entire study region, rather than finding locally optimal solutions. Solutions are constrained by the measured and inferred slip rates on faults from paleoseismic studies and geodetic data. The complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area is used as a test case for this new method, and results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method that has previously een developed for complex fault systems. Numerical experiments using both the integer programming and greedy‐sequential methods reveal differences on which branching faults are activated during multifault ruptures, depending on how strictly the model tries to fit a target slip rate with large uncertainty. An integer programming method is developed to determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on a fault system with branching faults Results are compared to the greedy‐sequential method—a local optimization algorithm previously developed for complex fault systems Application of these methods to San Francisco Bay Area faults indicate which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures
A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming, has been advanced in the field of operations research but has not been widely applied to geophysical problems until recently. In this application, we determine the optimal distribution of earthquakes on mapped faults to minimize the global misfit in slip rates for multifault ruptures. Integer programming solves for a decision vector composed of every possible location that a sample of earthquakes can occur on every fault, subject to slip rate uncertainty constraints. Step over connections are straightforward to include, whereas branching fault connections are not. To include branching ruptures, we distinguish between individual multifault rupture paths, as opposed to formulating the integer programming problem based on individual faults as in previous studies. The new method is applied to the complex fault system in the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study. Results from the integer programming method are compared to those from a local optimization method, termed the greedy‐sequential method. Several experiments using these two methods indicate that shape of the on‐fault magnitude distributions and which branching faults are involved in multifault ruptures depend on how much emphasis is placed on fitting the target slip rate. In cases where the underlying data are not strong enough to warrant chasing the target slip rate, it is better to focus on the distribution of feasible results that better represents the uncertainty in the solutions imposed by the data.
Author Geist, Eric L.
Parsons, Tom
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Eric L.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0611-1150
  surname: Geist
  fullname: Geist, Eric L.
  email: egeist@usgs.gov
  organization: U.S. Geological Survey
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tom
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0582-4338
  surname: Parsons
  fullname: Parsons, Tom
  organization: U.S. Geological Survey
BookMark eNp9kc1uEzEUhUeolegPOx7AElsCtmdsj5cQ0iFSK5BK19ad8Z3EYTJubI9QdjwCz9gnqdMgVCHBylefzj3XR-e8OBn9iEXxmtF3jHL9nlNOmzmltZbVi-KMCS5mmamTZ_PL4jzGDaWsEqI-K3afXEzBtVNyfiS-JwsIab2b4DtGkgmQjwHGbu3GFbmCaUjkdh8TbsldPKDlmHCFgXwNfhVguz0wGC1pAqLdP_z8dYu7CcfkYCA3mNbexsvitIch4qvf70Vxd7X4Nv88u_7SLOcfrmdQaslmVknd5SgAtZJCWqSlBbBtW7FeWtCaIbMclRa9BdkzaG1Nu1pzLDXtAMqLYnn0tR425j64LYS98eDME_BhZXJU1w1oWim6bMG4FX0lodNCCcwDp6VQqmTZ683R6z74nCcms_FTGPP3Da8qqWipKppVb4-qLvgYA_Z_rjJqDgWZ5wVlOf9L3rkEhx5SADf8a6k8Lv1wA-7_e8A0TbPgnCtWPgJWUKTT
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1029_2021JB022050
crossref_primary_10_5194_nhess_22_3607_2022
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSTARS_2022_3216998
crossref_primary_10_1785_0120220175
Cites_doi 10.1785/0120010148
10.1785/0220120105
10.1093/gji/ggz294
10.1785/0120110349
10.1029/2009GL038295
10.1016/j.jsg.2009.10.007
10.1029/2000JB900254
10.1177/8755293019878199
10.1007/s10479-006-0091-y
10.3133/ofr20131165
10.1002/2014JB011765
10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01594.x
10.1785/0120070111
10.1785/0120020014
10.1002/2015GL063575
10.1287/ijoc.13.2.96.10515
10.1029/2000GL011560
10.1029/2002JB002189
10.1785/0120090189
10.1785/BSSA0840041216
10.3133/ofr20071437E
10.1002/2014TC003561
10.1029/2008JB006173
10.1029/2007JB005027
10.1126/science.aam7194
10.1029/2019GL084741
10.1785/0120120322
10.1029/2001JB000572
10.1029/2000JB000061
10.1785/0120080069
10.1126/sciadv.1601441
10.1785/0120130180
10.1007/s11600-017-0020-2
10.3133/ofr20071437I
10.1029/2008JB006174
10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.018
10.1029/2011GL047849
10.3133/fs20163020
10.1785/0120130164
10.1785/0120040601
10.1785/BSSA0840040974
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
– notice: 2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7TG
7TN
F1W
H96
KL.
L.G
DOA
DOI 10.1029/2020GC008964
DatabaseName CrossRef
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Oceanic Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Geology
EISSN 1525-2027
EndPage n/a
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731
10_1029_2020GC008964
GGGE22271
Genre article
GeographicLocations San Francisco Bay
GeographicLocations_xml – name: San Francisco Bay
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: U.S. Geological Survey
GroupedDBID 05W
0R~
1OC
24P
31~
3V.
50Y
5GY
8-1
88I
8CJ
8FE
8FH
8G5
8R4
8R5
A00
AAESR
AAHHS
AANHP
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABUWG
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIYS
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYN
AFBPY
AFGKR
AFKRA
AFPWT
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMYDB
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
AZQEC
AZVAB
BDRZF
BENPR
BFHJK
BHPHI
BKSAR
BMXJE
BPHCQ
BRXPI
CCPQU
CS3
D1J
DCZOG
DPXWK
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EJD
FEDTE
G-S
GNUQQ
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HVGLF
HZ~
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LK5
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M2O
M2P
M7R
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
MY~
M~E
O9-
OK1
P-X
P2W
PCBAR
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q2X
R.K
ROL
SUPJJ
UB1
WBKPD
WYJ
ZZTAW
~02
~OA
AAFWJ
AAYXX
AGQPQ
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
7TG
7TN
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AFPKN
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
F1W
H96
KL.
L.G
WIN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a3961-d769c008aa87656de03daadbb41f6da991e1d2e795fda6f1abd80c892e390caa3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1525-2027
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:51 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 13:12:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:16:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:32 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:33:44 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a3961-d769c008aa87656de03daadbb41f6da991e1d2e795fda6f1abd80c892e390caa3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-0582-4338
0000-0003-0611-1150
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731
PQID 2446703740
PQPubID 54722
PageCount 22
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731
proquest_journals_2446703740
crossref_primary_10_1029_2020GC008964
crossref_citationtrail_10_1029_2020GC008964
wiley_primary_10_1029_2020GC008964_GGGE22271
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September 2020
2020-09-00
20200901
2020-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2020
  text: September 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Washington
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washington
PublicationTitle Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2012; 83
2010; 32
2000; 27
2007; 149
2012; 102
2010
2017; 65
2018; 123
2015; 120
1998
2010; 100
2008
2007
2020; 36
2008; 98
2003
2003; 93
2011; 38
2017; 356
2009; 114
1994; 84
2009; 99
2007; 112
2018; 111
2009; 36
2004; 94
2003; 108
2016; 2
2000; 105
2019; 46
2015; 42
2002; 107
2002; 148
2016
2002; 92
2019; 219
2013
2001; 13
2014; 104
2014; 33
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_33_1
Chen D.‐S. (e_1_2_9_10_1) 2010
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_37_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
Wolsey L. A. (e_1_2_9_52_1) 1998
e_1_2_9_41_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_45_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_43_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
Williams H. P. (e_1_2_9_50_1) 2013
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_49_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_53_1
e_1_2_9_51_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
Wells D. L. (e_1_2_9_47_1) 1994; 84
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_42_1
e_1_2_9_40_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_46_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_44_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_48_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
Parsons T. (e_1_2_9_32_1) 2018; 123
References_xml – start-page: 66
  year: 2013
– volume: 107
  issue: B11
  year: 2002
  article-title: Dynamic shear rupture interactions with fault bends and off‐axis secondary faulting
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 13
  start-page: 96
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  end-page: 103
  article-title: Representations of the all_different predicate of constraint satisfaction in integer programming
  publication-title: INFORMS Journal on Computing
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2734
  year: 2015
  end-page: 2741
  article-title: Potential for larger earthquakes in the East San Francisco Bay Area due to the direct connection between the Hayward and Calaveras faults
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 149
  start-page: 37
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 41
  article-title: Progress in computational mixed integer programming—A look back from the other side of the tipping point
  publication-title: Annals of Operations Research
– volume: 111
  start-page: 244
  year: 2018
  end-page: 259
  article-title: Determining on‐fault earthquake magnitude distributions from integer programming
  publication-title: Computers & Geosciences
– volume: 114
  year: 2009
  article-title: Dynamic path selection along branched faults: Experiments involving sub‐Rayleigh and supershear ruptures
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– year: 2007
– volume: 120
  start-page: 326
  year: 2015
  end-page: 343
  article-title: Synthetic earthquake catalogs simulating seismic activity in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, fault system
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 123
  start-page: 10,761
  year: 2018
  end-page: 10,784
  article-title: Characteristic earthquake magnitude frequency distributions on faults calculated from consensus data in California
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 32
  start-page: 118
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 126
  article-title: The mechanics of first order splay faulting: The strike‐slip case
  publication-title: Journal of Structural Geology
– year: 2003
– volume: 104
  start-page: 1181
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1204
  article-title: The UCERF3 grand inversion: Solving for the long‐term rate of ruptures in a fault system
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1216
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1228
  article-title: A kinematic self‐similar rupture process for earthquakes
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 104
  start-page: 1299
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1328
  article-title: The earthquake cycle in the San Francisco Bay region: AD 1600–2012
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 65
  start-page: 243
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 257
  article-title: A physics‐based earthquake simulator and its application to seismic hazard assessment in Calabria (Southern Italy) region
  publication-title: Acta Geophysica
– volume: 219
  start-page: 734
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  end-page: 752
  article-title: A combinatorial approach to determine earthquake magnitude distributions on a variable slip‐rate fault
  publication-title: Geophysical Journal International
– year: 2016
– volume: 84
  start-page: 974
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1002
  article-title: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 99
  start-page: 2012
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2019
  article-title: Is there a basis for preferring characteristic earthquakes over a Gutenberg‐Richter distribution in probabilistic earthquake forecasting?
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 94
  start-page: S202
  issue: 6B
  year: 2004
  end-page: S213
  article-title: Dynamic slip transfer from the Denali to Totschunda faults, Alaska: Testing theory for fault branching
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 36
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 41
  article-title: The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications
  publication-title: Earthquake Spectra
– start-page: 411
  year: 2013
– volume: 100
  start-page: 1971
  issue: 5A
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1988
  article-title: Earthquake fault scaling: Self‐consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 104
  start-page: 1122
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1180
  article-title: Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time‐independent model
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 83
  start-page: 983
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 990
  article-title: RSQSim earthquake simulator
  publication-title: Seismological Research Letters
– volume: 112
  year: 2007
  article-title: Role of fault branches in earthquake rupture dynamics
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 38
  year: 2011
  article-title: Influence of material contrast on fault branching behavior
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2025
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2044
  article-title: Subsurface geometry of the San Andreas‐Calaveras fault junction: Influence of serpentinite and the Coast Range ophiolite
  publication-title: Tectonics
– start-page: 264
  year: 1998
– volume: 107
  issue: B2
  year: 2002
  article-title: Three‐dimensional nonplanar simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 27
  start-page: 3635
  issue: 22
  year: 2000
  end-page: 3638
  article-title: Selectivity of spontaneous rupture propagation on a branched fault
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 36
  year: 2009
  article-title: Tsunamis and splay fault dynamics
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– start-page: 469
  year: 2010
– year: 2008
– volume: 105
  start-page: 25543
  issue: B11
  year: 2000
  end-page: 25552
  article-title: Slip rates on San Francisco Bay area faults from anelastic deformation of the continental lithosphere
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 2
  issue: 10
  year: 2016
  article-title: Missing link between the Hayward and Rodgers Creek faults
  publication-title: Science Advances
– volume: 93
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 13
  article-title: An empirical model for earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, 2002–2031
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 356
  issue: 6334
  year: 2017
  article-title: Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 46
  start-page: 11859
  year: 2019
  end-page: 11867
  article-title: The July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence: Kinematics of slip and stressing in cross‐fault ruptures
  publication-title: Geophysical Research Letters
– volume: 148
  start-page: 520
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 541
  article-title: Seismic moment distribution revisited: I. Statistical results
  publication-title: Geophysical Journal International
– volume: 114
  year: 2009
  article-title: Finite element simulations of dynamic shear rupture experiments and dynamic path selection along kinked and branched faults
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1841
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1846
  article-title: A bilinear source‐scaling model for M‐log A observations of continental earthquakes
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1609
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1632
  article-title: Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: Issues and implications for seismic‐hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– volume: 108
  issue: B5
  year: 2003
  article-title: Effects of prestress state and rupture velocity on dynamic fault branching
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– volume: 102
  start-page: 2667
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2676
  article-title: Possible earthquake rupture connections on mapped California faults ranked by calculated Coulomb linking stress
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
– year: 2013
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120010148
– ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
  doi: 10.1785/0220120105
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz294
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120110349
– ident: e_1_2_9_48_1
  doi: 10.1029/2009GL038295
– start-page: 411
  volume-title: Model building in mathematical programming
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_9_50_1
– start-page: 469
  volume-title: Applied integer programming: Modeling and simulation
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2009.10.007
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1029/2000JB900254
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1177/8755293019878199
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10479-006-0091-y
– ident: e_1_2_9_46_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.3133/ofr20131165
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1002/2014JB011765
– ident: e_1_2_9_41_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01594.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_49_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120070111
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120020014
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1002/2015GL063575
– ident: e_1_2_9_51_1
  doi: 10.1287/ijoc.13.2.96.10515
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1029/2000GL011560
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1029/2002JB002189
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120090189
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1785/BSSA0840041216
– ident: e_1_2_9_45_1
  doi: 10.3133/ofr20071437E
– ident: e_1_2_9_44_1
  doi: 10.1002/2014TC003561
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
  doi: 10.1029/2008JB006173
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1029/2007JB005027
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.aam7194
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1029/2019GL084741
– ident: e_1_2_9_40_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120120322
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1029/2001JB000572
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.1029/2000JB000061
– volume: 123
  start-page: 10,761
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  article-title: Characteristic earthquake magnitude frequency distributions on faults calculated from consensus data in California
  publication-title: Journal of Geophysical Research
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120080069
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_43_1
  doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601441
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120130180
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11600-017-0020-2
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.3133/ofr20071437I
– ident: e_1_2_9_42_1
  doi: 10.1029/2008JB006174
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.018
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1029/2011GL047849
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.3133/fs20163020
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120130164
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1785/0120040601
– volume: 84
  start-page: 974
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_9_47_1
  article-title: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  doi: 10.1785/BSSA0840040974
– start-page: 264
  volume-title: Integer programming
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_9_52_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_53_1
SSID ssj0014558
Score 2.335153
Snippet A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer programming,...
Abstract A new global optimization method is used to determine the distribution of earthquakes on a complex, connected fault system. The method, integer...
SourceID doaj
proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
SubjectTerms Distribution
earthquake forecast
Earthquakes
Fault lines
Faults
Geological hazards
greedy‐sequential
Integer programming
Methods
Numerical experiments
Operations research
Seismic activity
Seismic hazard
slip rates
Uncertainty
Title Distribution of Earthquakes on a Branching Fault System Using Integer Programming and Greedy‐Sequential Methods
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029%2F2020GC008964
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2446703740
https://doaj.org/article/b65c6f112d5f46ac9575e46a20357731
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3LSsQwFA0yILgRnzg6Sha60mKb52Tp6ExFGBFUmF1JmlTBcdR5LGYjfoLf6Jd4k3ZkXKgbN6WEUG7vvW1OkpNzEdp3BTeOCBtRrUzEcuMiVTAS2cQw6xS1MrAJu5fi_JZd9HhvrtSX54SV8sCl446N4LkoABVYXjChcwX4wsENiSmXMpygJjDmzSZT1f4B47xZ0dxjovwMP05PYbhTgn0bgIJO_zdwOQ9RwxjTWUHLFTjEJ6VRq2jBDdbQYhqK707X0cuZV7mtClThpwK3wfz7l4l-cCMMLRq3fJkMv6aEO3rSH-NSjxwHXgD2i393boivSkrWo2_TA4s99cZOP97erwOtGj75Pu6GwtKjDXTbad-cnkdVyYRIUyWSCFyrcnhPreEvx4V1MbVaW2NYUgirAQy6xBInFS-sBrdqY5tx3lTEURXnWtNNVBs8DdwWwsILu0jDBHcFM0QqSR03lEmY1kqIRx0dzvyY5ZWeuC9r0c_CvjZR2bzX6-jgq_dzqaPxQ7-WD8lXH69-HRogJ7IqJ7K_cqKOGrOAZtUnOcoAxwjp1XbiOjoKQf7VkCxN07Y_KJxs_4dJO2jJP71kpzVQbTycuF2AM2OzFzIXrt3X9ieD9_AV
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution+of+Earthquakes+on+a+Branching+Fault+System+Using+Integer+Programming+and+Greedy%E2%80%90Sequential+Methods&rft.jtitle=Geochemistry%2C+geophysics%2C+geosystems+%3A+G3&rft.au=Geist%2C+Eric+L.&rft.au=Parsons%2C+Tom&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.issn=1525-2027&rft.eissn=1525-2027&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029%2F2020GC008964&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1029_2020GC008964
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1525-2027&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1525-2027&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1525-2027&client=summon