How Effective Are the Cross-Examination and Expert Testimony Safeguards? Jurors' Perceptions of the Suggestiveness and Fairness of Biased Lineup Procedures
Mock jurors ( N = 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure varied in terms of foil, instruction, and presentation biases. Expert testimony regarding the factors that influence lineup su...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of applied psychology Vol. 87; no. 6; pp. 1042 - 1054 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Washington, DC
American Psychological Association
01.12.2002
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Mock jurors (
N
= 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure varied in terms of foil, instruction, and presentation biases. Expert testimony regarding the factors that influence lineup suggestiveness was also manipulated. Criteria included juror ratings of lineup suggestiveness and fairness, ratings of defendant culpability, and verdicts. Jurors were sensitive to foil bias but only minimally sensitive to instruction and presentation biases. Expert testimony enhanced juror sensitivity only to instruction bias. These results have implications for the effectiveness of cross-examination and expert testimony as safeguards against erroneous convictions resulting from mistaken identifications. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Mock jurors (N = 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure varied in terms of foil, instruction, and presentation biases. Expert testimony regarding the factors that influence lineup suggestiveness was also manipulated. Criteria included juror ratings of lineup suggestiveness and fairness, ratings of defendant culpability, and verdicts. Jurors were sensitive to foil bias but only minimally sensitive to instruction and presentation biases. Expert testimony enhanced juror sensitivity only to instruction bias. These results have implications for the effectiveness of cross-examination and expert testimony as safeguards against erroneous convictions resulting from mistaken identifications. Mock jurors (n=800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure varied in terms of foil, instruction, and presentation biases. Expert testimony regarding the factors that influence lineup suggestiveness was also manipulated. Criteria included juror ratings of lineup suggestiveness and fairness, ratings of defendant culpability, and verdicts. Jurors were sensitive to foil bias but only minimally sensitive to instruction and presentation biases. Expert testimony enhanced juror sensitivity only to instruction bias. These results have implications for the effectiveness of cross-examination and expert testimony as safeguards against erroneous convictions resulting from mistaken identifications. (Original abstract) Mock jurors (N = 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure varied in terms of foil, instruction, and presentation biases. Expert testimony regarding the factors that influence lineup suggestiveness was also manipulated. Criteria included juror ratings of lineup suggestiveness and fairness, ratings of defendant culpability, and verdicts. Jurors were sensitive to foil bias but only minimally sensitive to instruction and presentation biases. Expert testimony enhanced juror sensitivity only to instruction bias. These results have implications for the effectiveness of cross-examination and expert testimony as safeguards against erroneous convictions resulting from mistaken identifications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) Mock jurors ( N = 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness identification procedure varied in terms of foil, instruction, and presentation biases. Expert testimony regarding the factors that influence lineup suggestiveness was also manipulated. Criteria included juror ratings of lineup suggestiveness and fairness, ratings of defendant culpability, and verdicts. Jurors were sensitive to foil bias but only minimally sensitive to instruction and presentation biases. Expert testimony enhanced juror sensitivity only to instruction bias. These results have implications for the effectiveness of cross-examination and expert testimony as safeguards against erroneous convictions resulting from mistaken identifications. |
| Author | Stinson, Veronica Devenport, Jennifer L Cutler, Brian L Kravitz, David A |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jennifer L surname: Devenport fullname: Devenport, Jennifer L organization: Department of Psychology, California State University ,Fullerton – sequence: 2 givenname: Veronica surname: Stinson fullname: Stinson, Veronica organization: Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University – sequence: 3 givenname: Brian L surname: Cutler fullname: Cutler, Brian L organization: JuryTactics, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina – sequence: 4 givenname: David A surname: Kravitz fullname: Kravitz, David A organization: School of ManagementGeorge Mason University |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14514117$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12558212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkl1rFDEUhoNU7Lb6CwQJgno1NZ-TyZXUZWuVBQut1yGTOVmnzJfJTO3-Fv-sme3iihf2KpzwvO85h_OeoKOu7wChl5ScUcLVe0IYzTRJZaHO8vQn2BO0oJrrjBZSHKHFH-IYncR4SwgVXJNn6JgyKQtG2QL9uux_4pX34Mb6DvB5ADx-B7wMfYzZ6t62dWfHuu-w7Sq8uh8gjPgG4li3fbfF19bDZrKhih_wlyn0Ib7DVxAcDLMm4t7v3K6nzWbW3EEHMe6sLmwddkVCPtY2QoXXdQfTgK9C76CaAsTn6Km3TYQX-_cUfbtY3Swvs_XXT5-X5-vMcs3GrCwFV4oIInkuSqIZp7rU0jtVSVlqW-VMCi8qRoE7WRa5Z2BJQb2zudKe81P09sF3CP2PKQ1q2jo6aBrbQT9Fo1jBmeTqUVAqmibR8lGQF4IKLVkCX_8D3vZT6NK2Jk_HUlxL8T-IUZ7uLYp5Cf4Aufl0AbwZQt3asDWUmDkvZk6DmdNgCmVyM-clqV7traeyheqg2QckAW_2gI3ONj7YztXxwAlJBaXqwNnBmiFunQ1j7RqIxg7NXw1_A12_1hs |
| CODEN | JAPGBP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11292_016_9279_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11292_020_09412_3 crossref_primary_10_1300_J158v06n01_05 crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2017_1390113 crossref_primary_10_1002_jip_123 crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2020_1733570 crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_1578 crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2022_2038156 crossref_primary_10_1348_135532509X477225 crossref_primary_10_1111_jels_12259 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11896_010_9071_x crossref_primary_10_1080_13218719_2018_1504239 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_lawsocsci_051120_014122 crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2020_1774588 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10979_008_9134_z crossref_primary_10_1002_jip_1429 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11292_019_09381_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_0093854818776998 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11896_012_9102_x crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_3737 crossref_primary_10_1080_13218719_2020_1733696 crossref_primary_10_1080_13218719_2021_1956382 crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2011_631539 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00400.x 10.1080/00050068908259576 10.1002/bsl.2370130206 10.1007/BF01040619 10.1002/bsl.2370070206 10.1007/BF02803685 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01151.x 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.741 10.1037/0003-066X.56.5.405 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.724 10.1177/0146167290161008 10.1007/BF01056165 10.1007/BF01044829 10.1007/BF01049310 10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.64 10.1007/BF01044688 10.1002/acp.2350010207 10.1007/BF01046211 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00897.x 10.1007/BF01044534 10.1007/BF01067032 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.211 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.363 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.9 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.796 10.1007/BF01062972 10.1007/BF01045284 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.776 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00016.x 10.1007/BF01056410 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01200.x 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.281 10.2307/3480433 10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.482 10.1007/BF01064273 10.1007/BF01040622 10.1007/BF01044644 10.1007/BF01040620 10.1177/004912417900700305 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2002 American Psychological Association 2003 INIST-CNRS Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2002 2002, American Psychological Association |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2002 American Psychological Association – notice: 2003 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2002 – notice: 2002, American Psychological Association |
| DBID | IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QJ 8BJ FQK JBE 7RZ PSYQQ 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 |
| DatabaseName | Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences APA PsycArticles® ProQuest One Psychology MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest One Psychology PsycARTICLES MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest One Psychology |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology Law |
| EISSN | 1939-1854 |
| EndPage | 1054 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 284111181 10_1037_0021_9010_87_6_1042 12558212 14514117 apl_87_6_1042 |
| Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Feature |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIMH NIH HHS grantid: MH16156 |
| GroupedDBID | - 08R 0R 186 1AW 1OL 29J 2KS 3EH 3RD 4 41 53G 53T 5GY 5RE 5VS 7RZ 85S 8VB 9M8 A AAAHA AADNC AAIKC AAWTL ABDEX ABFLS ABHGV ABIVO ABMGS ABPPZ ABUFD ACCUC ACHQT ACNCT ACTDY ACVYA ADKFC ADKLL AETEA AFDAS AFFNX AFMIJ AIDAL AJDVN AKVCP ALEEW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASUFR AZXWR B4K CS3 DU5 DZ EBR EBU EMK EPA ET F20 F3I F5P FTD G8K GJ HVGLF HZ H~9 ISO L7B LW5 MVM NHB O9- OHM OHT OMK OPA OVD P-O P2P PQEST PQQKQ QWB QZG REG ROL RXW SES SKT SPA TAE TAF TH9 TN5 TWZ U5U UHB UHS ULE UNC UNR UPT VH1 VQA WH7 X XFK XHC XJT XZL YCJ YYQ YZZ Z ZCG ZGI ZHY ZKG ZL0 ZPI ZXP ZY4 --- --Z -DZ -ET -~X .-4 ..I .GJ 0R~ 1CY 354 41~ 6TJ AAMNW ABCQX ABGFU ABNCP ABTAH ACGFO ACPQG AEMOZ AI. CGNQK HZ~ IQODW K1G TEORI UBC XOL YK4 YQT YYP ZCA ~A~ ADMHG AEHFB AWKKM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF LPU NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QJ 8BJ FQK JBE PSYQQ 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-bb43770405364b092319b95fc7d55b9ad6254f4d21e3c5b86f2ea081fca679f33 |
| ISSN | 0021-9010 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 02:58:25 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 00:25:45 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 02:33:59 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 14:36:37 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 18:59:25 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 15:43:13 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:26:16 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 22 16:04:57 EDT 2023 Thu Sep 03 20:19:49 EDT 2020 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | Human Justice Testimony Suggestibility Information layout Guilt Cognitive bias Social cognition Criminology Judgment |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a392t-bb43770405364b092319b95fc7d55b9ad6254f4d21e3c5b86f2ea081fca679f33 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7317-9502 |
| PMID | 12558212 |
| PQID | 614373954 |
| PQPubID | 41284 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_72832537 proquest_miscellaneous_57137795 proquest_miscellaneous_38414952 proquest_journals_614373954 proquest_journals_213939483 crossref_primary_10_1037_0021_9010_87_6_1042 pubmed_primary_12558212 pascalfrancis_primary_14514117 apa_psycarticles_apl_87_6_1042 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2002-12-00 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2002-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2002 text: 2002-12-00 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Washington, DC |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington, DC – name: United States – name: Washington |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of applied psychology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Appl Psychol |
| PublicationYear | 2002 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association |
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Psychological Association |
| References | 1993; 48 1987; 1 1987; 11 1997; 82 1990; 14 1991; 15 1988; 18 1990; 16 1986; 10 1991; 76 1989; 7 1995; 13 1983; 7 1980; 88 1980; 65 1986; 16 1996 1988; 12 1995 1973 1994 1972 1988; 73 1992 1989; 24 1996; 11 1981; 66 1990; 20 1993; 17 1986; 3 1982; 6 1980; 4 1985; 70 1988; 66 1994; 79 1984 1985; 73 1996; 81 2001; 56 1989; 13 1985; 15 1989 1967 1979; 7 r3_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r45_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r8_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r40_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Cutler (r6_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1995 Wells (r56_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1990; 16 r14_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r27_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Connors (r4_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1996 r48_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Wells (r52_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1984 r32_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Wells (r53_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1986; 3 r17_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r50_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r5_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r22_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Fisher (r16_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1992 Walters (r51_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1985; 73 r47_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r42_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r29_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 McConkey (r37_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1989; 24 r38_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r12_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Penrod (r43_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1995; 13 Bartol (r1_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1994 r30_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Noon (r39_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1987; 1 r33_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r15_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r24_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Cutler (r7_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1989; 7 r49_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r31_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r18_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r36_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Keppel (r21_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1989 r23_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r2_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r10_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r57_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r44_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r9_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r13_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r54_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r26_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r20_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 Paley (r41_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1989; 7 r34_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r25_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r55_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 MacCoun (r35_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042) 1988; 66 r19_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r46_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r28_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 r11_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 |
| References_xml | – volume: 18 start-page: 252 year: 1988 end-page: 276 article-title: Judge's instruction on eyewitness testimony: Evaluation and revision publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology – volume: 14 start-page: 185 year: 1990 end-page: 191 article-title: Jury sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 56 start-page: 405 year: 2001 end-page: 416 article-title: On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research publication-title: American Psychologist – volume: 79 start-page: 724 year: 1994 end-page: 729 article-title: Effectiveness of voir dire as a safeguard in eyewitness cases publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – year: 1996 publication-title: Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial – volume: 1 start-page: 143 year: 1987 end-page: 153 article-title: Lay knowledge of eyewitness behaviour: A British survey publication-title: Applied Cognitive Psychology – volume: 73 start-page: 281 year: 1988 end-page: 290 article-title: Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 17 start-page: 661 year: 1993 end-page: 677 article-title: Reliability and validity of the original and revised Legal Attitudes Questionnaire publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 15 start-page: 207 year: 1985 end-page: 229 article-title: Testifying on eyewitness reliability: Expert advice is not always persuasive publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology – year: 1972 publication-title: U.S. v. Telfaire – volume: 70 start-page: 556 year: 1985 end-page: 564 article-title: Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 13 start-page: 311 year: 1989 end-page: 332 article-title: The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 11 start-page: 223 year: 1987 end-page: 258 article-title: The reliability of eyewitness identifications. The role of system and estimator variables publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 4 start-page: 303 year: 1980 end-page: 314 article-title: What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracy publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 16 start-page: 447 year: 1986 end-page: 459 article-title: Mock-juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology – year: 1996 publication-title: How much impact does expert testimony have on juror decisions? A meta-analysis – volume: 17 start-page: 11 year: 1993 end-page: 26 article-title: An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identifications publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – year: 1995 publication-title: Mistaken identifications: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law – volume: 76 start-page: 741 year: 1991 end-page: 745 article-title: Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 88 start-page: 776 year: 1980 end-page: 784 article-title: On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications publication-title: Psychological Bulletin – volume: 82 start-page: 211 year: 1997 end-page: 220 article-title: How effective is the motion-to-suppress safeguard? Judges' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 13 start-page: 385 year: 1989 end-page: 395 article-title: The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 81 start-page: 64 year: 1996 end-page: 75 article-title: How effective is the presence-of-counsel safeguard? Attorney perceptions of suggestiveness, fairness, and correctability of biased lineup procedures publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 7 start-page: 3 year: 1989 end-page: 13 article-title: The effects of alternative photospread instructions on suspect identification performance publication-title: American Journal of Forensic Psychology – volume: 4 start-page: 275 year: 1980 end-page: 285 article-title: Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 12 start-page: 41 year: 1988 end-page: 56 article-title: Jury decision making in eyewitness identification cases publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 65 start-page: 9 year: 1980 end-page: 15 article-title: Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 7 start-page: 19 year: 1983 end-page: 30 article-title: The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – year: 1992 publication-title: Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing – volume: 24 start-page: 377 year: 1989 end-page: 384 article-title: Knowledge of eyewitness memory publication-title: Australian Psychologist – volume: 10 start-page: 215 year: 1986 end-page: 228 article-title: The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock-juror judgment publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – year: 1994 publication-title: Psychology and Law – volume: 4 start-page: 287 year: 1980 end-page: 296 article-title: Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – year: 1973 publication-title: U.S. v. Ash – year: 1989 publication-title: Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches – volume: 66 start-page: 482 year: 1981 end-page: 489 article-title: Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – year: 1972 publication-title: Kirby v. Illinois – volume: 6 start-page: 15 year: 1982 end-page: 30 article-title: Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 3 start-page: 71 year: 1986 end-page: 93 article-title: Expert psychological testimony: Empirical and conceptual analyses of effects publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 7 start-page: 337 year: 1979 end-page: 355 article-title: Role playing and the study of jury behavior publication-title: Social Methods and Research – volume: 13 start-page: 89 year: 1989 end-page: 100 article-title: Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological note publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 7 start-page: 215 year: 1989 end-page: 255 article-title: Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis publication-title: Behavioral Sciences and the Law – volume: 16 start-page: 106 year: 1990 end-page: 117 article-title: Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly conducted lineups publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin – volume: 20 start-page: 1197 year: 1990 end-page: 1207 article-title: Nonadversarial methods for improving juror sensitivity to eyewitness evidence publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology – volume: 73 start-page: 363 year: 1988 end-page: 370 article-title: Eyewitness testimony: False alarms on biased instructions? publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 73 start-page: 1402 year: 1985 end-page: 1430 article-title: Admission of expert testimony on eyewitness identification publication-title: California Law Review – volume: 76 start-page: 796 year: 1991 end-page: 802 article-title: Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 18 start-page: 1171 year: 1988 end-page: 1192 article-title: Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock-juror judgment publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Psychology – year: 1967 publication-title: Stovall v. Denno – start-page: 256 year: 1984 end-page: 272 article-title: How adequate is human intuition for judging eyewitness testimony? publication-title: Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives – volume: 11 start-page: 35 year: 1996 end-page: 40 article-title: The effect of authority and social influence on eyewitness suggestibility and person recognition publication-title: Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology – year: 1984 publication-title: People v. McDonald – volume: 15 start-page: 43 year: 1991 end-page: 57 article-title: Eyewitness identification and the selection of distractors for lineups publication-title: Law and Human Behavior – volume: 48 start-page: 553 year: 1993 end-page: 571 article-title: What do we know about eyewitness identification? publication-title: American Psychologist – volume: 66 start-page: 482 year: 1988 end-page: 489 article-title: Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – volume: 13 start-page: 229 year: 1995 end-page: 259 article-title: Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: The state of the law and the science publication-title: Behavioral Sciences and the Law – year: 1967 publication-title: U.S. v. Wade – ident: r54_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553 – ident: r8_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00400.x – volume: 24 start-page: 377 issn: 0005-0067 year: 1989 ident: r37_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Knowledge of eyewitness memory. publication-title: Australian Psychologist doi: 10.1080/00050068908259576 contributor: fullname: McConkey – ident: r15_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – volume-title: Psychology and Law. year: 1994 ident: r1_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 contributor: fullname: Bartol – volume: 13 start-page: 229 issn: 0735-3936 year: 1995 ident: r43_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: The state of the law and the science. publication-title: Behavioral Sciences & the Law doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370130206 contributor: fullname: Penrod – ident: r57_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01040619 – volume: 7 start-page: 215 issn: 0735-3936 year: 1989 ident: r7_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. publication-title: Behavioral Sciences & the Law doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370070206 contributor: fullname: Cutler – ident: r14_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF02803685 – volume: 66 start-page: 482 issn: 0022-3514 year: 1988 ident: r35_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology contributor: fullname: MacCoun – ident: r31_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01151.x – ident: r29_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.741 – ident: r20_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.5.405 – ident: r38_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.724 – volume: 16 start-page: 106 issn: 0146-1672 year: 1990 ident: r56_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly conducted lineups. publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin doi: 10.1177/0146167290161008 contributor: fullname: Wells – ident: r25_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01056165 – ident: r33_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01044829 – ident: r13_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01049310 – ident: r47_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – start-page: 256 volume-title: Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives year: 1984 ident: r52_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: How adequate is human intuition for judging eyewitness testimony? contributor: fullname: Wells – ident: r45_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.64 – ident: r26_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01044688 – volume: 3 start-page: 71 issn: 0147-7307 year: 1986 ident: r53_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Expert psychological testimony: Empirical and conceptual analyses of effects. publication-title: Law and Human Behavior contributor: fullname: Wells – volume-title: Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing. year: 1992 ident: r16_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 contributor: fullname: Fisher – ident: r23_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – volume: 1 start-page: 143 issn: 0888-4080 year: 1987 ident: r39_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Lay knowledge of eyewitness behaviour: A British survey. publication-title: Applied Cognitive Psychology doi: 10.1002/acp.2350010207 contributor: fullname: Noon – ident: r48_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – ident: r17_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01046211 – ident: r34_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00897.x – ident: r42_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01044534 – ident: r9_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01067032 – volume-title: Mistaken identifications: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. year: 1995 ident: r6_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 contributor: fullname: Cutler – volume-title: Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. year: 1996 ident: r4_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 contributor: fullname: Connors – ident: r46_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.211 – ident: r28_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556 – ident: r24_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.363 – ident: r32_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.9 – ident: r30_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.796 – ident: r49_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – ident: r10_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01062972 – ident: r3_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01045284 – ident: r55_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.776 – ident: r18_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00016.x – ident: r40_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01056410 – ident: r2_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01200.x – ident: r5_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.281 – volume: 7 start-page: 3 issn: 0733-1290 year: 1989 ident: r41_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: The effects of alternative photospread instructions on suspect identification performance. publication-title: The American Journal of Forensic Psychology contributor: fullname: Paley – volume: 73 start-page: 1402 issn: 0008-1221 year: 1985 ident: r51_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 article-title: Admission of expert testimony on eyewitness identification. publication-title: California Law Review doi: 10.2307/3480433 contributor: fullname: Walters – ident: r36_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.482 – ident: r12_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01064273 – ident: r27_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01040622 – ident: r50_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – ident: r11_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01044644 – volume-title: Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. year: 1989 ident: r21_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 contributor: fullname: Keppel – ident: r44_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 – ident: r19_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1007/BF01040620 – ident: r22_10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042 doi: 10.1177/004912417900700305 |
| SSID | ssj0014390 |
| Score | 1.9664239 |
| Snippet | Mock jurors (
N
= 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness... Mock jurors (N = 800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness... Mock jurors (n=800) viewed a videotaped trial that included information about a lineup identification procedure. Suggestiveness of the eyewitness... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed pascalfrancis apa |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1042 |
| SubjectTerms | Adjudication Applied psychology Bias Biological and medical sciences Courts Crime Cross examination Expert Testimony Expert witness testimony Fairness Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Identity parades Judgement Judiciary Juries Jurors Law Litigation Memory Perception Perceptions Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology Studies Suggestibility Suggestion Surveys and Questionnaires Testimony USA Variance analysis Videotape Recording Witnesses |
| Title | How Effective Are the Cross-Examination and Expert Testimony Safeguards? Jurors' Perceptions of the Suggestiveness and Fairness of Biased Lineup Procedures |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12558212 https://www.proquest.com/docview/213939483 https://www.proquest.com/docview/614373954 https://search.proquest.com/docview/38414952 https://search.proquest.com/docview/57137795 https://search.proquest.com/docview/72832537 |
| Volume | 87 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELa6y2UlhGB5lYXiA4hDSEUc53VCgFqtlrIcaNHeLDuPVSXUVnkAy1_hR_AXmbHzWrUVj0vUJs4k0vdlZmx_HhPyTEIMTliS2T6LQpszxW0Z-xKFa4nMkjhRuqTQh3P_dMHPLryLweBXT7VUlWoc_9i5ruR_UIVzgCuukv0HZFujcAJ-A75wBITh-FcY435wRpCB-h_UcGEaqQOfnX6XqHIpG7mxLuVfWiVW1YAXvLIKmaWXSJDiuTu1zqp8nWtFxaaTujQCgqK6xGmoxjGiOZwH0n-giVpCKEwsTFirjaVDYlLltThxO_GVdeK7aXxvO6qPCqZ2b_tGd2O1w9Ofynap2udU1_TtZEaoazIDDzm6rPae97n8utR71hr5fj1224xzsJ5mpFl3YMQkfd9dB-vlliOGXibrBXXIIvnOgGFKDrS2x2Ew9sfdzf3y3OcfxXQxm4n55GJ-QG4w8GzoUidvF-20FWR3Zs1Tba4pc6WLSG09YkdCdHMjC_g2M7Opyv5ej85-5rfJrRo9-sZw8A4ZpKtjcjCT347JURtDr-6Sn0BJ2lKSAiUpEIhuUZICh6ihJG0pSTtKvqaGkC9oj450nWlr1-moTTV0xCaGjtTQkXZ0vEcW08n83ald7_9hS8jaS1sp7gYBRBnP9bl6hV2RSEVeFgeJ56lIJtB35xlPmJO6sadCP2OphBQ3i6UfRJnr3ieHq_UqfUio8iOHc5UmEXe4TP2Ix2AwjAKWqSDw_SEZARQCid8IUoXcfBFhIHyBWA3JywYlsTF1YITWb7io32COQGj7zUfXkOzu4dBDcZxgSE4aaEXtUQrBoDvmRjx0d16FRNrFaXU-JE_bqxAMcIZPrtJ1VQg35Djiwfa38AJdYtTb3yLAzcs8F97wgWFc9-7Mw2X17NEfn39CjrpP-DE5LPMqfQLJe6lG-oP5DSKx9WE |
| link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
| linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+effective+are+the+cross-examination+and+expert+testimony+safeguards%3F+Jurors%27+perceptions+of+the+suggestiveness+and+fairness+of+biased+lineup+procedures&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+psychology&rft.au=Devenport%2C+Jennifer+L&rft.au=Stinson%2C+Veronica&rft.au=Cutler%2C+Brian+L&rft.au=Kravitz%2C+David+A&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1042&rft.epage=1054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2F0021-9010.87.6.1042&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-9010&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-9010&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-9010&client=summon |