Informational advantages in social networks: The core-periphery divide in peer performance ratings

Organizations frequently rely on peer performance ratings to capture employees' unique and difficult to observe contributions at work. Though useful, peers exhibit meaningful variance in the accuracy and informational utility they offer about ratees. In this research, we develop and test theory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied psychology
Main Authors Zhao, Helen H, Li, Ning, Harris, T Brad, Rosen, Christopher C, Zhang, Xinan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2021
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Organizations frequently rely on peer performance ratings to capture employees' unique and difficult to observe contributions at work. Though useful, peers exhibit meaningful variance in the accuracy and informational utility they offer about ratees. In this research, we develop and test theory which suggests that raters' social network positions explains this variance in systematic ways. Drawing from information processing theory, we posit that members who occupy core (peripheral) positions in the network have greater (less) access to firsthand and secondhand performance information about ratees, which is in turn associated with more (less) accurate performance ratings. To overcome difficulties in obtaining a "true" performance score in interdependent field settings, we employ an external criterion comparison method to benchmark our arguments, such that larger validity coefficients between established predictors of performance (i.e., a ratee's general mental ability [GMA] and conscientiousness) and peer performance ratings should reflect more (less) accurate ratings for core (peripheral) members. In Study 1, we use an organization-wide network in a technology startup company to examine the validity coefficient of a ratee's GMA on performance as rated by central versus peripheral members. In Study 2, we attempt to replicate and extend Study 1's conclusions in team networks using ratee conscientiousness as a benchmark indicator. Findings from both studies generally support the hypotheses that core network members provide distinct, and presumably more accurate, peer performance ratings than peripheral network members. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
AbstractList Organizations frequently rely on peer performance ratings to capture employees' unique and difficult to observe contributions at work. Though useful, peers exhibit meaningful variance in the accuracy and informational utility they offer about ratees. In this research, we develop and test theory which suggests that raters' social network positions explains this variance in systematic ways. Drawing from information processing theory, we posit that members who occupy core (peripheral) positions in the network have greater (less) access to firsthand and secondhand performance information about ratees, which is in turn associated with more (less) accurate performance ratings. To overcome difficulties in obtaining a "true" performance score in interdependent field settings, we employ an external criterion comparison method to benchmark our arguments, such that larger validity coefficients between established predictors of performance (i.e., a ratee's general mental ability [GMA] and conscientiousness) and peer performance ratings should reflect more (less) accurate ratings for core (peripheral) members. In Study 1, we use an organization-wide network in a technology startup company to examine the validity coefficient of a ratee's GMA on performance as rated by central versus peripheral members. In Study 2, we attempt to replicate and extend Study 1's conclusions in team networks using ratee conscientiousness as a benchmark indicator. Findings from both studies generally support the hypotheses that core network members provide distinct, and presumably more accurate, peer performance ratings than peripheral network members. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Author Rosen, Christopher C
Li, Ning
Zhang, Xinan
Harris, T Brad
Zhao, Helen H
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Helen H
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Helen H
  organization: School of Business
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ning
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4534-9009
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Ning
  organization: Department of Management and Organizations
– sequence: 3
  givenname: T Brad
  surname: Harris
  fullname: Harris, T Brad
  organization: Department of Management, Entrepreneurship, and Leadership
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Christopher C
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4332-8009
  surname: Rosen
  fullname: Rosen, Christopher C
  organization: Department of Management
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xinan
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Xinan
  organization: Department of Management Science
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j91KxDAUhIMo7o_e-ACSF6gmPW2TeieLqwsL3vR-OU1Od6NtWpK6sm9v_ZuLGRiGD2bBzn3vibEbKe6kAHWPQysm6TQ9Y3NZQplInWcztojxTQiZQSku2QxSnaelVnNWb3zThw5H13tsOdoj-hH3FLnzPPbGTaWn8bMP7_GBVwfipg-UDBTccKBw4tYdnaXv9UAUJgs_PG-Ih4nq9_GKXTTYRrr-yyWr1k_V6iXZvj5vVo_bBEHLMSmyWlmFKPKiVkVmVCOsKEwpJBoF2loopFRZY60EJQANABRK69xAhkjpkt3-YoePuiO7G4LrMJx2_1_TL-DAVtA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_1477309
crossref_primary_10_1002_hrm_22078
crossref_primary_10_1002_job_2584
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_intman_2023_101029
crossref_primary_10_1287_orsc_2021_15302
crossref_primary_10_1177_01492063241237227
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2022_3207775
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
DOI 10.1037/apl0000822
DatabaseName PubMed
DatabaseTitle PubMed
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 1939-1854
ExternalDocumentID 32852987
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Science Foundation of China
– fundername: Shangai Municipal Education Commission
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
-ET
-~X
..I
0R~
1CY
29J
354
5GY
5RE
5VS
7RZ
85S
AAIKC
AAMNW
AAWTL
ABCQX
ABGFU
ABIVO
ABNCP
ABPPZ
ACCUC
ACGFO
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACPQG
ADMHG
AEHFB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASUFR
AWKKM
AZXWR
CGNQK
CS3
DU5
EBU
EPA
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
ISO
L7B
LW5
NPM
O9-
OPA
OVD
P2P
PQQKQ
ROL
RXW
SES
SPA
TAE
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
U5U
UHB
ULE
UPT
VQA
WH7
XZL
YCJ
YK4
YQT
YZZ
ZCA
ZPI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-64b7d7aa056b764c7f0d06c901ac738dd361174fdd13703ac33367885c34aae2
IngestDate Wed Oct 16 00:44:52 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a381t-64b7d7aa056b764c7f0d06c901ac738dd361174fdd13703ac33367885c34aae2
ORCID 0000-0003-4332-8009
0000-0002-4534-9009
PMID 32852987
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_32852987
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of applied psychology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Appl Psychol
PublicationYear 2021
SSID ssj0014390
Score 2.4617217
Snippet Organizations frequently rely on peer performance ratings to capture employees' unique and difficult to observe contributions at work. Though useful, peers...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
Title Informational advantages in social networks: The core-periphery divide in peer performance ratings
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852987
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV09T8MwELUoSKgL4vsbeWCrDEmcxAkbQqAKQaciVSyV4zjQgbQqXcqv5_yVtKUgYImqOK0i3-v55XzvBaFzKpT6MfOITKOcAP_3CedJRoApUO7FXka1wvuxE7efwvte1FtQl0yyC_GxVFfyn6jCOYirUsn-IbLVj8IJ-AzxhSNEGI6_irHVEtlynt7On_AX3WLliuGlafN-d90VyrWSKHdjZScwbWk1ljSt5HKsTIwrGYGChquif2Wv3LLXkUugVWn--ZUPqwWt1j48DAzw7Eqpk954bBwOui21pV_v_diq0IzxgS3m2vJE4FetrLC6mJSa0pQAKwiXJmwj-efq_aXafH72IpiZ0ZsOHQ2SKEjNyvzz6IJ5thtqoAZLVALsqGKO3WQCLuY5x1rKLuubaKJ198WFpw3NOrqbaMNOOL42sd9CK7LcRs1q1ZruoGwOBLgGAR6U2IAAOxBcYYAAnocANhBQVysI4BkIYAuBXdS9u-3etIl9cQbhQMAmJA4zljPOgdxmLA4FK7zciwVQPy4YTfKcxj48iRZ57lPI-FxQSoG0JJGgIecy2EOr5bCUBwjLgAkhaVL4RRoKz0_CtGA5kNYi5GkQiUO0b6anPzLmKH03cUffjhyjZg2UE7RWwL9RngK1m2RnOkCfFXBRzg
link.rule.ids 786
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Informational+advantages+in+social+networks%3A+The+core-periphery+divide+in+peer+performance+ratings&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+psychology&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Helen+H&rft.au=Li%2C+Ning&rft.au=Harris%2C+T+Brad&rft.au=Rosen%2C+Christopher+C&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fapl0000822&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32852987&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32852987&rft.externalDocID=32852987