Modeling and optimal control of an energy-storing prosthetic knee

Advanced prosthetic knees for transfemoral amputees are currently based on controlled damper mechanisms. Such devices require little energy to operate, but can only produce negative or zero joint power, while normal knee joint function requires alternative phases of positive and negative work. The i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomechanical engineering Vol. 134; no. 5; p. 051007
Main Authors van den Bogert, Antonie J, Samorezov, Sergey, Davis, Brian L, Smith, William A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Advanced prosthetic knees for transfemoral amputees are currently based on controlled damper mechanisms. Such devices require little energy to operate, but can only produce negative or zero joint power, while normal knee joint function requires alternative phases of positive and negative work. The inability to generate positive work may limit the user's functional capabilities, may cause undesirable adaptive behavior, and may contribute to excessive metabolic energy cost for locomotion. In order to overcome these problems, we present a novel concept for an energy-storing prosthetic knee, consisting of a rotary hydraulic actuator, two valves, and a spring-loaded hydraulic accumulator. In this paper, performance of the proposed device will be assessed by computational modeling and by simulation of functional activities. A computational model of the hydraulic system was developed, with methods to obtain optimal valve control patterns for any given activity. The objective function for optimal control was based on tracking of joint angles, tracking of joint moments, and the energy cost of operating the valves. Optimal control solutions were obtained, based on data collected from three subjects during walking, running, and a sit-stand-sit cycle. Optimal control simulations showed that the proposed device allows near-normal knee function during all three activities, provided that the accumulator stiffness was tuned to each activity. When the energy storage mechanism was turned off in the simulations, the system functioned as a controlled damper device and optimal control results were similar to literature data on human performance with such devices. When the accumulator stiffness was tuned to walking, simulated performance for the other activities was sub-optimal but still better than with a controlled damper. We conclude that the energy-storing knee concept is valid for the three activities studied, that modeling and optimal control can assist the design process, and that further studies using human subjects are justified.
AbstractList Advanced prosthetic knees for transfemoral amputees are currently based on controlled damper mechanisms. Such devices require little energy to operate, but can only produce negative or zero joint power, while normal knee joint function requires alternative phases of positive and negative work. The inability to generate positive work may limit the user's functional capabilities, may cause undesirable adaptive behavior, and may contribute to excessive metabolic energy cost for locomotion. In order to overcome these problems, we present a novel concept for an energy-storing prosthetic knee, consisting of a rotary hydraulic actuator, two valves, and a spring-loaded hydraulic accumulator. In this paper, performance of the proposed device will be assessed by computational modeling and by simulation of functional activities. A computational model of the hydraulic system was developed, with methods to obtain optimal valve control patterns for any given activity. The objective function for optimal control was based on tracking of joint angles, tracking of joint moments, and the energy cost of operating the valves. Optimal control solutions were obtained, based on data collected from three subjects during walking, running, and a sit-stand-sit cycle. Optimal control simulations showed that the proposed device allows near-normal knee function during all three activities, provided that the accumulator stiffness was tuned to each activity. When the energy storage mechanism was turned off in the simulations, the system functioned as a controlled damper device and optimal control results were similar to literature data on human performance with such devices. When the accumulator stiffness was tuned to walking, simulated performance for the other activities was sub-optimal but still better than with a controlled damper. We conclude that the energy-storing knee concept is valid for the three activities studied, that modeling and optimal control can assist the design process, and that further studies using human subjects are justified.
Author van den Bogert, Antonie J
Smith, William A
Davis, Brian L
Samorezov, Sergey
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Antonie J
  surname: van den Bogert
  fullname: van den Bogert, Antonie J
  email: bogert@orchardkinetics.com
  organization: Orchard Kinetics, Cleveland, OH, USA. bogert@orchardkinetics.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sergey
  surname: Samorezov
  fullname: Samorezov, Sergey
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Brian L
  surname: Davis
  fullname: Davis, Brian L
– sequence: 4
  givenname: William A
  surname: Smith
  fullname: Smith, William A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22757495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j81OwzAQhC0Eoj9w4AWQXyBl14kd51hVUJCKuMC5cux1CaR25JhD354gQHMYafRpNLNg5yEGYuwGYYWI8g5XFYBSGs7YHKXQhW4kzthiHD8AEHUFl2wmRC3rqpFztn6OjvouHLgJjschd0fTcxtDTrHn0U8xp0DpcCrGHNMPOKQ45nfKneWfgeiKXXjTj3T950v29nD_unksdi_bp816V5hS6Vw4W5uyIaG8aIUTDqqSJjW2JQkovWqVB7DCtQIrJ5sSdIXaOA8OvbIoluz2t3f4ao_k9kOapqbT_v-L-AYMXEow
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apm_2014_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42235_021_0065_4
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954411915581653
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2017_2725740
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4043460
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMRB_2022_3146628
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2014_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2014_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1123_jab_2019_0043
crossref_primary_10_3182_20140824_6_ZA_1003_00332
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4026342
crossref_primary_10_19113_sdufenbed_1164720
crossref_primary_10_1080_10833196_2017_1346033
crossref_primary_10_3390_app11052037
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2017_2763999
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2019_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4030391
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4037653
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4030056
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00158_018_2017_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0188266
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1115/1.4006680
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
Forestry
EISSN 1528-8951
ExternalDocumentID 22757495
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.DC
.GJ
29J
4.4
53G
5AI
5GY
6TJ
AAYJJ
ABJNI
ACBEA
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACKMT
ACXMS
ADPDT
AI.
ALEEW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
F5P
H~9
L7B
NPM
P2P
RAI
RNS
RXW
TAE
TN5
UKR
VH1
WHG
ZE2
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-dc7a39e26f2b2d2d043e3e39cbe5015f6b6f00c2db214d59308418adf0d1f6c12
IngestDate Thu Apr 03 07:07:08 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a368t-dc7a39e26f2b2d2d043e3e39cbe5015f6b6f00c2db214d59308418adf0d1f6c12
PMID 22757495
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_22757495
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of biomechanical engineering
PublicationTitleAlternate J Biomech Eng
PublicationYear 2012
SSID ssj0011840
Score 2.1733952
Snippet Advanced prosthetic knees for transfemoral amputees are currently based on controlled damper mechanisms. Such devices require little energy to operate, but can...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 051007
SubjectTerms Computer Simulation
Humans
Knee Prosthesis
Mechanical Phenomena
Prosthesis Design
Time Factors
Walking
Title Modeling and optimal control of an energy-storing prosthetic knee
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22757495
Volume 134
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PS8MwFA5TQfQg_v4tOXiTzjZNuva4iSLCPE3wJmmTiKjt0OlhF_9130vTrpMpKoNSEjpKv5fHy8v7vkfIcWyUZKEwXpRw6XHYYGARAPeCWIlEaMW0QHJy_zq6vOFXt-K21fpoVC29jdJ2Np7JK_kPqjAGuCJL9g_I1n8KA3AP-MIVEIbrrzDGRmZPFcuwgMX_bNU-yuJzPODPT7Tl9nlWC8TyzotXCPlQpfUx19NlQJPQ1HLykRJsEdQTycIKHiQ9gcM66RX3jvPTxV7ED7pxyiSxhHdcvNv8KnI86-R9rWzQe0H3Uqef6yyPSwK5PKvLSWBxR1UB2NbOj7LYixOnJVs5Wpe2fGieZVu3iZ6hbH47w6Oj-EXQ5hgclU2fGsgOny20jHVEh5fdOn-e_SKuXU3NkTnYZmDfVEz2uEMo3Pw6MSp4i9P6HVBA2j33ZTNig5LBKllxkNFuaRprpKXzdbLc0JhcJ4vYfBU7-sFt3xVSbJBuZToUTIc606HOdGhhYJhOmw6dmA5F09kkNxfng7NLz3XT8GQYxSNPZR0ZJppFhqVMMeXzUMMvyVItICY0URoZ38-YSlnAYaGGfsyDWCrjq8BEWcC2yHxe5HqH0NRg2JgKpBbxxIg4kCYLpQxRmkj4apdsl1_lblhKptxV32vv25l9sjSxpAOyYGCN6kMI-EbpkYXlE8JOVbA
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling+and+optimal+control+of+an+energy-storing+prosthetic+knee&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+biomechanical+engineering&rft.au=van+den+Bogert%2C+Antonie+J&rft.au=Samorezov%2C+Sergey&rft.au=Davis%2C+Brian+L&rft.au=Smith%2C+William+A&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.eissn=1528-8951&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=051007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115%2F1.4006680&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22757495&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22757495&rft.externalDocID=22757495