Four years of continuous use of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch: impact on soil and groundwater quality

•Environmental impact of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch (SBPM) was assessed.•SBPM increased soil aggregate stability by 6–16% than no mulching.•SBPM increased water infiltration rate by 10–12% than no mulching.•SBPM reduced 4-7 kg ha−1 of nitrate and nitrite leached into groundwater.•The downside,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeoderma Vol. 381; p. 114665
Main Authors Sintim, Henry Y., Bandopadhyay, Sreejata, English, Marie E., Bary, Andy, Liquet y González, José E., DeBruyn, Jennifer M., Schaeffer, Sean M., Miles, Carol A., Flury, Markus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Environmental impact of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch (SBPM) was assessed.•SBPM increased soil aggregate stability by 6–16% than no mulching.•SBPM increased water infiltration rate by 10–12% than no mulching.•SBPM reduced 4-7 kg ha−1 of nitrate and nitrite leached into groundwater.•The downside, SBPM reduced soil burst CO2-C by 4-54 g kg−1 day−1. There is an increased interest in the use of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch due to limited disposal options for conventional polyethylene mulch. However, information about the impact of continuous use of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch on the environment is limited. Here, we show the effects on soil and groundwater quality from the use of soil-biodegradable plastic mulches for crop production for four consecutive seasons. Two soil-biodegradable plastic mulch products were assessed at two locations (Knoxville, TN and Mount Vernon, WA) having different climates (humid subtropical and cool Mediterranean), with cellulosic-paper mulch, polyethylene mulch, and no-mulch included as control treatments. Soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were first assessed in the spring of 2015 (prior to any field operations), and then a few days after harvest in the fall of 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. Water samples were collected in the fall of 2018 from lysimeters installed at 55-cm depth and analyzed for nutrient composition. Compared to the no-mulch treatment, the soil-biodegradable plastic mulches and polyethylene mulch increased the soil aggregate stability (by 6–16%) and water infiltration rate (by 10–12%) by protecting the soil surface from disturbance. Residual nitrate and nitrite under the plastic mulch after harvest were lower than under no-mulch (by 4.1 kg ha−1 to 7.3 kg ha−1) due to increased yield and associated enhanced nutrient uptake. However, plastic mulching, especially the polyethylene mulch, reduced soil microbial activity, measured as burst CO2-C by 6 g kg−1 day−1 to 54 kg−1 day−1, but had no effect on extractable organic carbon concentrations nor specific extracellular enzyme activity rates. Within the four-year period, the soil-biodegradable plastic mulches had overall positive effects on soil and groundwater quality, except for reduced burst microbial respiration, which was more pronounced in Mount Vernon.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-7061
1872-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114665