Comparison of Arrhythmia Detection by 24-Hour Holter and 14-Day Continuous Electrocardiography Patch Monitoring

Background: Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is insufficient. Methods: We compared a 14-day electrocardiography (ECG) monitor patch-a single-use, noninvasive, waterproof, continuous m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa Cardiologica Sinica Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 251 - 259
Main Authors Chua, Su-Kiat, Chen, Lung-Ching, Lien, Li-Ming, Lo, Huey-Ming, Liao, Zhen-Yu, Chao, Shu-Ping, Chuang, Cheng-Yen, Chiu, Chiung-Zuan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 台灣 中華民國心臟學會 01.05.2020
Taiwan Society of Cardiology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background: Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is insufficient. Methods: We compared a 14-day electrocardiography (ECG) monitor patch-a single-use, noninvasive, waterproof, continuous monitoring patch-with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 32 consecutive patients with suspected arrhythmia. Results: The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated, and its rates of detection of relevant arrhythmias on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 13%, 28%, 47%, and 66%, respectively. The detection rate of paroxysmal arrhythmias was significantly higher for the 14-day ECG patch than for the 24-hour Holter monitor (66% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Among the 32 patients, 202 atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter episodes were detected in 6 patients (22%) with the 14-day ECG patch; however, only 1 atrial fibrillation episode was detected in a patient (3%, p < 0.05) with the 24-hour Holter monitor. Other clinically relevant arrhythmias recorded on the 14-day ECG patch included 21 (65.5%) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia, 2 (6.3%) long pause, and 2 (6.3%) ventricular arrhythmias. The mean dermal response score immediately after removal of the 14-day ECG patch from the patients was 0.64, which indicated minimal erythema. Conclusions: The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated and allowed for longer continuous monitoring than the 24-hour Holter monitor, thus resulting in improved clinical accuracy in the detection of paroxysmal arrhythmias. Future studies should examine the long-term effectiveness of 14-day ECG patches for managing selected patients.
AbstractList Background: Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is insufficient. Methods: We compared a 14-day electrocardiography (ECG) monitor patch—a single-use, noninvasive, waterproof, continuous monitoring patch—with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 32 consecutive patients with suspected arrhythmia. Results: The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated, and its rates of detection of relevant arrhythmias on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 13%, 28%, 47%, and 66%, respectively. The detection rate of paroxysmal arrhythmias was significantly higher for the 14-day ECG patch than for the 24-hour Holter monitor (66% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Among the 32 patients, 202 atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter episodes were detected in 6 patients (22%) with the 14-day ECG patch; however, only 1 atrial fibrillation episode was detected in a patient (3%, p < 0.05) with the 24-hour Holter monitor. Other clinically relevant arrhythmias recorded on the 14-day ECG patch included 21 (65.5%) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia, 2 (6.3%) long pause, and 2 (6.3%) ventricular arrhythmias. The mean dermal response score immediately after removal of the 14-day ECG patch from the patients was 0.64, which indicated minimal erythema. Conclusions: The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated and allowed for longer continuous monitoring than the 24-hour Holter monitor, thus resulting in improved clinical accuracy in the detection of paroxysmal arrhythmias. Future studies should examine the long-term effectiveness of 14-day ECG patches for managing selected patients.
Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is insufficient. We compared a 14-day electrocardiography (ECG) monitor patch - a single-use, noninvasive, waterproof, continuous monitoring patch - with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 32 consecutive patients with suspected arrhythmia. The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated, and its rates of detection of relevant arrhythmias on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 13%, 28%, 47%, and 66%, respectively. The detection rate of paroxysmal arrhythmias was significantly higher for the 14-day ECG patch than for the 24-hour Holter monitor (66% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Among the 32 patients, 202 atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter episodes were detected in 6 patients (22%) with the 14-day ECG patch; however, only 1 atrial fibrillation episode was detected in a patient (3%, p < 0.05) with the 24-hour Holter monitor. Other clinically relevant arrhythmias recorded on the 14-day ECG patch included 21 (65.5%) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia, 2 (6.3%) long pause, and 2 (6.3%) ventricular arrhythmias. The mean dermal response score immediately after removal of the 14-day ECG patch from the patients was 0.64, which indicated minimal erythema. The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated and allowed for longer continuous monitoring than the 24-hour Holter monitor, thus resulting in improved clinical accuracy in the detection of paroxysmal arrhythmias. Future studies should examine the long-term effectiveness of 14-day ECG patches for managing selected patients.
Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is insufficient.BACKGROUNDAlthough 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is insufficient.We compared a 14-day electrocardiography (ECG) monitor patch - a single-use, noninvasive, waterproof, continuous monitoring patch - with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 32 consecutive patients with suspected arrhythmia.METHODSWe compared a 14-day electrocardiography (ECG) monitor patch - a single-use, noninvasive, waterproof, continuous monitoring patch - with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 32 consecutive patients with suspected arrhythmia.The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated, and its rates of detection of relevant arrhythmias on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 13%, 28%, 47%, and 66%, respectively. The detection rate of paroxysmal arrhythmias was significantly higher for the 14-day ECG patch than for the 24-hour Holter monitor (66% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Among the 32 patients, 202 atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter episodes were detected in 6 patients (22%) with the 14-day ECG patch; however, only 1 atrial fibrillation episode was detected in a patient (3%, p < 0.05) with the 24-hour Holter monitor. Other clinically relevant arrhythmias recorded on the 14-day ECG patch included 21 (65.5%) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia, 2 (6.3%) long pause, and 2 (6.3%) ventricular arrhythmias. The mean dermal response score immediately after removal of the 14-day ECG patch from the patients was 0.64, which indicated minimal erythema.RESULTSThe 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated, and its rates of detection of relevant arrhythmias on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 were 13%, 28%, 47%, and 66%, respectively. The detection rate of paroxysmal arrhythmias was significantly higher for the 14-day ECG patch than for the 24-hour Holter monitor (66% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Among the 32 patients, 202 atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter episodes were detected in 6 patients (22%) with the 14-day ECG patch; however, only 1 atrial fibrillation episode was detected in a patient (3%, p < 0.05) with the 24-hour Holter monitor. Other clinically relevant arrhythmias recorded on the 14-day ECG patch included 21 (65.5%) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia, 2 (6.3%) long pause, and 2 (6.3%) ventricular arrhythmias. The mean dermal response score immediately after removal of the 14-day ECG patch from the patients was 0.64, which indicated minimal erythema.The 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated and allowed for longer continuous monitoring than the 24-hour Holter monitor, thus resulting in improved clinical accuracy in the detection of paroxysmal arrhythmias. Future studies should examine the long-term effectiveness of 14-day ECG patches for managing selected patients.CONCLUSIONSThe 14-day ECG patch was well tolerated and allowed for longer continuous monitoring than the 24-hour Holter monitor, thus resulting in improved clinical accuracy in the detection of paroxysmal arrhythmias. Future studies should examine the long-term effectiveness of 14-day ECG patches for managing selected patients.
Author Zhen-Yu Liao
Shu-Ping Chao
Lung-Ching Chen
Su-Kiat Chua
Li-Ming Lien
Cheng-Yen Chuang
Chiung-Zuan Chiu
Huey-Ming Lo
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
3 College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University
1 School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– name: 1 School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City
– name: 4 Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
– name: 3 College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Su-Kiat
  surname: Chua
  fullname: Chua, Su-Kiat
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lung-Ching
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Lung-Ching
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Li-Ming
  surname: Lien
  fullname: Lien, Li-Ming
  organization: Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Huey-Ming
  surname: Lo
  fullname: Lo, Huey-Ming
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Zhen-Yu
  surname: Liao
  fullname: Liao, Zhen-Yu
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Shu-Ping
  surname: Chao
  fullname: Chao, Shu-Ping
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Cheng-Yen
  surname: Chuang
  fullname: Chuang, Cheng-Yen
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Chiung-Zuan
  surname: Chiu
  fullname: Chiu, Chiung-Zuan
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdUU1v1DAQ9aGIltJ_gJDFqRxSxp9ZX5BW6cciFYEEnC2v42xcJfbiOKD8e7zaBQGWxqPxvHkjv_cCnYUYHEJvCNxIQcS7dfPlhgIFEJrJa_a2FESBArY-QxcECKnkitNzdDVNT1AOByCyfo7OGeVUcA4XKDZx3Jvkpxhw7PA6pX7J_egNvnXZ2ezL-3bBlFebOCe8iUN2CZvQYsKrW7PgJobswxznCd8NZSBFa1Lr4y6Zfb_gzybbHn-MweeYfNi9RM86M0zu6pQv0bf7u6_Npnr89PChWT9WhgmaK2EFAcsYdEAZZ2B5uwIjGbOdsdJy2nIHim5b2lped0oq0dVu5YSzZaqz7BK9P_Lu5-3oWutCTmbQ--RHkxYdjdf_doLv9S7-0DWloKQoBNcnghS_z27KevSTdcNggiuf1ZQDl5xIUAX6-u9df5b8VrkAXh0B_fLTbXW_JGdaXWwTikBd2ptj2_jks9dPRelQxNEHCw8O6pPJx0TKBeS_QhxCsV9CiJ_C
ContentType Journal Article
DBID 188
9RA
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.6515/ACS.202005_36(3).20190903A
DatabaseName 華藝電子期刊
HyRead台灣全文資料庫
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EndPage 259
ExternalDocumentID PMC7220965
32425440
00559107
10116842_202005_202005120001_202005120001_251_259
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
188
23M
2UF
53G
5GY
9RA
ACGFS
AENEX
AINHJ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATFKH
CEFSP
CNMHZ
DIK
HYE
OK1
RPM
TUXDW
UZ5
8RM
ABJNI
C45
LMWXZ
OVD
TEORI
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-5c510c330f023430c4d80a633cfac6c42d4e092bd2dc47f9695f7e8e5ecc33fc3
ISSN 1011-6842
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:12:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:45:25 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:26:36 EST 2025
Mon Aug 25 09:48:34 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 01 22:51:09 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords ECG monitoring patch
Holter monitor
Arrhythmia
Atrial fibrillation
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a352t-5c510c330f023430c4d80a633cfac6c42d4e092bd2dc47f9695f7e8e5ecc33fc3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 32425440
PQID 2404641609
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7220965
proquest_miscellaneous_2404641609
pubmed_primary_32425440
hyweb_hyread_00559107
airiti_journals_10116842_202005_202005120001_202005120001_251_259
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace 台灣
PublicationPlace_xml – name: 台灣
– name: China (Republic : 1949- )
PublicationTitle Acta Cardiologica Sinica
PublicationTitleAlternate Acta Cardiol Sin
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher 中華民國心臟學會
Taiwan Society of Cardiology
Publisher_xml – name: 中華民國心臟學會
– name: Taiwan Society of Cardiology
SSID ssj0000400167
ssib016529507
ssib028553345
ssib004300060
ssib038076208
ssib018830194
Score 2.3232155
Snippet Background: Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such...
Although 24-hour Holter monitoring is routinely used for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, its sensitivity in detecting such arrhythmias is...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
hyweb
airiti
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 251
SubjectTerms Arrhythmia
Atrial fibrillation
ECG monitoring patch
EP & Arrhythmia
Holter monitor
MEDLINE
Original
SCIE
Scopus
Title Comparison of Arrhythmia Detection by 24-Hour Holter and 14-Day Continuous Electrocardiography Patch Monitoring
URI https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/10116842-202005-202005120001-202005120001-251-259
http://www.hyread.com.tw/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/search_detail_new.hpg&dtd_id=3&sysid=00559107
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425440
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2404641609
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7220965
Volume 36
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXxGOB8pKROIBWWRLbeR2r0lUF7XLYVuotchxnkwMtKumh_HpmbLduqx4WDk1bJ42rzOfxjD3zDSEfc15WKtFpkCjOA8EZDyQmArMaVB9Mx5XMMHd4cp2MZuLbPJ77pWyTXdKVl-rPybyS_5EqtIFcMUv2HyS7uyk0wGeQLxxBwnC8k4wH-0UEL_qrVbPpmp-tBC3SaVsDHKxLJoIR3O1itMSdcbNbEIngq0RlgHUi1hgFO7TlcJQJT7Us1kjfrxo36lfbKW7LWKs6idEiVeu058WNSbH04QJraaN-gu8gfd9s1dwYdEyAtbtvdxFBrTvTBpP9ZrOUO1rrjW92ixQs9CGBTq_iSixu-e0rXst84gDG97Wo5aA91u5YtR1ZJgY3l9hHGBdYjibDFWmM0ctxyWnHmeppta9_FFez8biYDufT--QBA3-C7y3rmClbmHQMszPu_qglqMUuvxx0-Il_9p2B2SJbJJ8C16bZwLx3yk85Drfds1-mT8hj53jQvkXRU3JPL56RhxMXWvGcLD2Y6LKmHkx0ByZabqgDE7VgogAmasFEPZjoCTBRAybqwXROZlfD6WAUuGocgQQjvQtiBeobBnRYg5kneKhElYUy4VzVUiVKsEpoGN1lxSol0jpP8rhOdaZjUBKc14q_IGeL5UK_IrTWUVolqspzJkUZs6xkaaaTqFJRVHOW9kjfPtbCDbbfGIkYoVgKJwj7FmGiWXT0JcZX3iPnRiJFswHvqyqQbA5MY7j3h62ECtCkuD0mFxqeTQG2rUjAPwnhty-txIpflvKlQLcjFiLskfRAlrsLkKX98MyibQxbe8oYMiy9vkO_b8gjP3jekrNutdbvwObtyvcGr38BTmilcg
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Arrhythmia+Detection+by+24-Hour+Holter+and+14-Day+Continuous+Electrocardiography+Patch+Monitoring&rft.jtitle=Acta+Cardiologica+Sinica&rft.au=Chua%2C+Su-Kiat&rft.au=Chen%2C+Lung-Ching&rft.au=Lien%2C+Li-Ming&rft.au=Lo%2C+Huey-Ming&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.issn=1011-6842&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft_id=info:doi/10.6515%2FACS.202005_36%283%29.20190903A&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.airitilibrary.com%2Fjnltitledo%2F10116842-c.jpg