Preliminary Empirical Model of Crucial Determinants of Best Practice for Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement
Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these studies have not adopted both fixed and mixed effects models for analyzing the effect size; they have not evaluated the moderating effect of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of educational psychology Vol. 107; no. 2; pp. 558 - 579 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
American Psychological Association
01.05.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these studies have not adopted both fixed and mixed effects models for analyzing the effect size; they have not evaluated the moderating effect of some commonly used parameters, such as comparing same-age reciprocal peer tutoring, same-age nonreciprocal, or cross-age peer tutoring; considered the educational level of tutee or tutor; or properly addressed publication bias. Most studies are confined to specific populations and particular subjects (mainly mathematics and reading), and some studies are confounded by other types of intervention (such as cooperative learning or adult-led tutoring). Hence, there is a compelling need for an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement that incorporates advances in methodology, is not confounded by other modes of peer learning, and engages a wide range of participants and various subjects. The present study demonstrates that peer tutoring has a positive impact on academic achievement. The moderators and crucial determinants of the effectiveness of peer tutoring are identified and compared. Moreover, program parameters based on the concepts of role theory and interdependent group contingencies are evaluated. Finally, a preliminary empirical model of the crucial determinants of best practices for peer tutoring on academic achievement is proposed. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these studies have not adopted both fixed and mixed effects models for analyzing the effect size; they have not evaluated the moderating effect of some commonly used parameters, such as comparing same-age reciprocal peer tutoring, same-age nonreciprocal, or cross-age peer tutoring; considered the educational level of tutee or tutor; or properly addressed publication bias. Most studies are confined to specific populations and particular subjects (mainly mathematics and reading), and some studies are confounded by other types of intervention (such as cooperative learning or adult-led tutoring). Hence, there is a compelling need for an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement that incorporates advances in methodology, is not confounded by other modes of peer learning, and engages a wide range of participants and various subjects. The present study demonstrates that peer tutoring has a positive impact on academic achievement. The moderators and crucial determinants of the effectiveness of peer tutoring are identified and compared. Moreover, program parameters based on the concepts of role theory and interdependent group contingencies are evaluated. Finally, a preliminary empirical model of the crucial determinants of best practices for peer tutoring on academic achievement is proposed. |
Author | Leung, Kim Chau |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Leung, Kim Chau |
BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1061885$$DView record in ERIC |
BookMark | eNotj81OwzAQhH0oEm1B4gWQ_AIB_9c5lhAKqIgcyrkyzhqMErtyXCTeHldwmZ35drXSLNAsxAAIXVFyQwlf3RpSVNV6huaEMFYRpfg5WkzTFymbEuYodAkGP_pg0g9ux4NP3poBv8QeBhwdbtLR-gLuIUM6nYU8nfgdTBl3ydjsLWAXE-4AEt4dc0w-fOAY8NqaHkZvi_n08A0jhHyBzpwZJrj8n0v09tDumsdq-7p5atbbynDBcmWE0WAVrHoltZCiloT0jq0YEKmcEACOQs24dUwJKSUVvKac63emHOmVY0t0_fcXSp_9Ifmx9Nu3z5QoqrVkv5rlVuE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2022_102773 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2017_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psicod_2024_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_15377903_2019_1568334 crossref_primary_10_1080_10645578_2021_1930467 crossref_primary_10_12973_ejmste_79805 crossref_primary_10_1177_0741932519855079 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci9010050 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0231410 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psicoe_2024_05_003 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_01923 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40670_024_02070_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_02671522_2024_2414318 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_017_9426_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2021_104252 crossref_primary_10_1177_23328584211042858 crossref_primary_10_1177_02557614251323665 crossref_primary_10_1107_S2056989021008744 crossref_primary_10_1080_0020739X_2017_1342284 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2018_1444734 crossref_primary_10_1177_2158244020929295 crossref_primary_10_3390_children8121125 crossref_primary_10_1002_pits_21930 crossref_primary_10_1080_00131911_2018_1474176 crossref_primary_10_1002_jaba_895 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40299_024_00960_0 crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2024_2385785 crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_149 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11390_020_9971_x crossref_primary_10_61143_umyu_jafr_6_1_2024_011 crossref_primary_10_1080_1554480X_2023_2246447 crossref_primary_10_15700_saje_v41ns2a1861 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_017_9410_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2019_e02491 crossref_primary_10_1002_trtr_2045 crossref_primary_10_1080_10691898_2018_1483785 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11020067 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10212_018_00412_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_0143034318808832 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_25662_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_13611267_2017_1403609 crossref_primary_10_1080_00220671_2019_1693947 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1304918 crossref_primary_10_5406_21627223_235_03 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2021_105335 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsp_2017_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2024_2389186 crossref_primary_10_1177_27527646251319767 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0236279 crossref_primary_10_1002_curj_307 crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_1372 crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_922 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_3802_12548 crossref_primary_10_12973_eu_jer_12_3_1409 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijedro_2025_100446 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsp_2019_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijedro_2024_100422 crossref_primary_10_1086_690210 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijedro_2023_100248 crossref_primary_10_1177_02557614221087761 crossref_primary_10_4103_njcp_njcp_1905_21 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN |
DOI | 10.1037/a0037698 |
DatabaseName | ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC |
DatabaseTitle | ERIC |
DatabaseTitleList | ERIC |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ERI name: ERIC url: https://eric.ed.gov/ sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Education Psychology |
ERIC | EJ1061885 |
ExternalDocumentID | EJ1061885 |
GroupedDBID | --Z -DZ -ET -~X 07C 0R~ 186 1VW 29K 2FS 2KS 354 3EH 41~ 53G 5GY 5VS 6P2 6TJ 7RZ 7SW 85S AAAHA AAIKC AAMNW AAYJJ ABFSI ABIVO ABNCP ABOPQ ABPPZ ABVOZ ACGFO ACHQT ACNCT ACPQG ACTDY ADMHC ADMHG ADRMJ ADUKH ADXHL AEHFB AETEA AFFNX AFSWV AGNAY AI. AIDAL ALEEW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AWKKM AZXWR BJH BKOMP BNH BNI BNJ BNO CGNQK CS3 D-I DU5 E.L EPA ERI F5P FTD HVGLF HZ~ ISO L7B LPU LW5 MVM NHB O9- OHT OMK OPA OVD P-O P2P PET PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PUEGO QZG REK ROL RXW S10 SES SPA TAE TEORI TN5 TWZ UBC UBH UHB UHS UKR UPT UQL VH1 WH7 WWN XIH XJT XOL XZL YQT YR5 YXB YYQ YZZ ZCA ZCG ZHY ZPI ZXP |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-a4a8ec6e7d6584549500df272e056f44eef1e923cf26455514391338b26f0d6f2 |
IEDL.DBID | ERI |
ISSN | 0022-0663 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 02 19:18:29 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | false |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a342t-a4a8ec6e7d6584549500df272e056f44eef1e923cf26455514391338b26f0d6f2 |
PageCount | 22 |
ParticipantIDs | eric_primary_EJ1061885 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-05-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2015 text: 2015-05-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of educational psychology |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Psychological Association |
SSID | ssj0003663 |
Score | 2.4110968 |
Snippet | Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these... |
SourceID | eric |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 558 |
SubjectTerms | Academic Achievement Best Practices Effect Size Literature Reviews Meta Analysis Peer Teaching Program Effectiveness Research Methodology Role Theory Standardized Tests Teacher Education Tutoring |
Title | Preliminary Empirical Model of Crucial Determinants of Best Practice for Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement |
URI | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1061885 |
Volume | 107 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV09b8IwED2VdoClamlRv3VD16iJ7TgwthSEkFoxgMSG4visItGAEAv_vudgKEulblEiZbiz796znt8BPOs8KXzdj4w0KlI5L2PDSDlKjJM2s0pr5y8Kf3zqwUQNp-n09-jiv4rKoWcy7XZag5oQ8Z71hAIsdRigxjzLd9S956zMXnLvt6I77TrUD_8ISuejttK_gPOAB_F1l8BLOKGy6UcpB9lFExqHErW9gnK0pkU1h2u9xd73al4ZfKAfaLbApcMuZ4oXFL4fiVz8-zeu_TgKF6KQcSqOiNY49gYG3LtwWeJeKM8PX3OqXMQ31zDp98bdQRQmJkS5VGIT5RxsKjRl1gMLpn5pHFsnMkGMc5xSRC4hhnSFYxyUVmCp40mqEdrFVjvRgtNyWdINYFFQESe5spY5oD8oFUyWjSQZWyu0tLfQ8lGbrXamGLNDOO_--nAPDUYb6U4t-ABnjvcXPXJL35inKoE_2oqcXA |
linkProvider | ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preliminary+Empirical+Model+of+Crucial+Determinants+of+Best+Practice+for+Peer+Tutoring+on+Academic+Achievement&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+educational+psychology&rft.au=Leung%2C+Kim+Chau&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.pub=American+Psychological+Association&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=558&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fa0037698&rft.externalDocID=EJ1061885 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-0663&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-0663&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-0663&client=summon |