Preliminary Empirical Model of Crucial Determinants of Best Practice for Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement

Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these studies have not adopted both fixed and mixed effects models for analyzing the effect size; they have not evaluated the moderating effect of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of educational psychology Vol. 107; no. 2; pp. 558 - 579
Main Author Leung, Kim Chau
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Psychological Association 01.05.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these studies have not adopted both fixed and mixed effects models for analyzing the effect size; they have not evaluated the moderating effect of some commonly used parameters, such as comparing same-age reciprocal peer tutoring, same-age nonreciprocal, or cross-age peer tutoring; considered the educational level of tutee or tutor; or properly addressed publication bias. Most studies are confined to specific populations and particular subjects (mainly mathematics and reading), and some studies are confounded by other types of intervention (such as cooperative learning or adult-led tutoring). Hence, there is a compelling need for an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement that incorporates advances in methodology, is not confounded by other modes of peer learning, and engages a wide range of participants and various subjects. The present study demonstrates that peer tutoring has a positive impact on academic achievement. The moderators and crucial determinants of the effectiveness of peer tutoring are identified and compared. Moreover, program parameters based on the concepts of role theory and interdependent group contingencies are evaluated. Finally, a preliminary empirical model of the crucial determinants of best practices for peer tutoring on academic achievement is proposed.
AbstractList Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these studies have not adopted both fixed and mixed effects models for analyzing the effect size; they have not evaluated the moderating effect of some commonly used parameters, such as comparing same-age reciprocal peer tutoring, same-age nonreciprocal, or cross-age peer tutoring; considered the educational level of tutee or tutor; or properly addressed publication bias. Most studies are confined to specific populations and particular subjects (mainly mathematics and reading), and some studies are confounded by other types of intervention (such as cooperative learning or adult-led tutoring). Hence, there is a compelling need for an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement that incorporates advances in methodology, is not confounded by other modes of peer learning, and engages a wide range of participants and various subjects. The present study demonstrates that peer tutoring has a positive impact on academic achievement. The moderators and crucial determinants of the effectiveness of peer tutoring are identified and compared. Moreover, program parameters based on the concepts of role theory and interdependent group contingencies are evaluated. Finally, a preliminary empirical model of the crucial determinants of best practices for peer tutoring on academic achievement is proposed.
Author Leung, Kim Chau
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Leung, Kim Chau
BackLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1061885$$DView record in ERIC
BookMark eNotj81OwzAQhH0oEm1B4gWQ_AIB_9c5lhAKqIgcyrkyzhqMErtyXCTeHldwmZ35drXSLNAsxAAIXVFyQwlf3RpSVNV6huaEMFYRpfg5WkzTFymbEuYodAkGP_pg0g9ux4NP3poBv8QeBhwdbtLR-gLuIUM6nYU8nfgdTBl3ydjsLWAXE-4AEt4dc0w-fOAY8NqaHkZvi_n08A0jhHyBzpwZJrj8n0v09tDumsdq-7p5atbbynDBcmWE0WAVrHoltZCiloT0jq0YEKmcEACOQs24dUwJKSUVvKac63emHOmVY0t0_fcXSp_9Ifmx9Nu3z5QoqrVkv5rlVuE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2022_102773
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2017_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psicod_2024_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1080_15377903_2019_1568334
crossref_primary_10_1080_10645578_2021_1930467
crossref_primary_10_12973_ejmste_79805
crossref_primary_10_1177_0741932519855079
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci9010050
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0231410
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psicoe_2024_05_003
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_01923
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40670_024_02070_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_02671522_2024_2414318
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_017_9426_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2021_104252
crossref_primary_10_1177_23328584211042858
crossref_primary_10_1177_02557614251323665
crossref_primary_10_1107_S2056989021008744
crossref_primary_10_1080_0020739X_2017_1342284
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2018_1444734
crossref_primary_10_1177_2158244020929295
crossref_primary_10_3390_children8121125
crossref_primary_10_1002_pits_21930
crossref_primary_10_1080_00131911_2018_1474176
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaba_895
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40299_024_00960_0
crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2024_2385785
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_149
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11390_020_9971_x
crossref_primary_10_61143_umyu_jafr_6_1_2024_011
crossref_primary_10_1080_1554480X_2023_2246447
crossref_primary_10_15700_saje_v41ns2a1861
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_017_9410_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2019_e02491
crossref_primary_10_1002_trtr_2045
crossref_primary_10_1080_10691898_2018_1483785
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11020067
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10212_018_00412_6
crossref_primary_10_1177_0143034318808832
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_25662_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_13611267_2017_1403609
crossref_primary_10_1080_00220671_2019_1693947
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2023_1304918
crossref_primary_10_5406_21627223_235_03
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2021_105335
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsp_2017_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2024_2389186
crossref_primary_10_1177_27527646251319767
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0236279
crossref_primary_10_1002_curj_307
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_1372
crossref_primary_10_1002_jaal_922
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_3802_12548
crossref_primary_10_12973_eu_jer_12_3_1409
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijedro_2025_100446
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsp_2019_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijedro_2024_100422
crossref_primary_10_1086_690210
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijedro_2023_100248
crossref_primary_10_1177_02557614221087761
crossref_primary_10_4103_njcp_njcp_1905_21
ContentType Journal Article
DBID 7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
DOI 10.1037/a0037698
DatabaseName ERIC
ERIC (Ovid)
ERIC
ERIC
ERIC (Legacy Platform)
ERIC( SilverPlatter )
ERIC
ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)
Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
ERIC
DatabaseTitle ERIC
DatabaseTitleList ERIC
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ERI
  name: ERIC
  url: https://eric.ed.gov/
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
Psychology
ERIC EJ1061885
ExternalDocumentID EJ1061885
GroupedDBID --Z
-DZ
-ET
-~X
07C
0R~
186
1VW
29K
2FS
2KS
354
3EH
41~
53G
5GY
5VS
6P2
6TJ
7RZ
7SW
85S
AAAHA
AAIKC
AAMNW
AAYJJ
ABFSI
ABIVO
ABNCP
ABOPQ
ABPPZ
ABVOZ
ACGFO
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACPQG
ACTDY
ADMHC
ADMHG
ADRMJ
ADUKH
ADXHL
AEHFB
AETEA
AFFNX
AFSWV
AGNAY
AI.
AIDAL
ALEEW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AWKKM
AZXWR
BJH
BKOMP
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
CGNQK
CS3
D-I
DU5
E.L
EPA
ERI
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
ISO
L7B
LPU
LW5
MVM
NHB
O9-
OHT
OMK
OPA
OVD
P-O
P2P
PET
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PUEGO
QZG
REK
ROL
RXW
S10
SES
SPA
TAE
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
UBC
UBH
UHB
UHS
UKR
UPT
UQL
VH1
WH7
WWN
XIH
XJT
XOL
XZL
YQT
YR5
YXB
YYQ
YZZ
ZCA
ZCG
ZHY
ZPI
ZXP
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-a4a8ec6e7d6584549500df272e056f44eef1e923cf26455514391338b26f0d6f2
IEDL.DBID ERI
ISSN 0022-0663
IngestDate Tue Sep 02 19:18:29 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess false
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a342t-a4a8ec6e7d6584549500df272e056f44eef1e923cf26455514391338b26f0d6f2
PageCount 22
ParticipantIDs eric_primary_EJ1061885
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-05-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-05-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Journal of educational psychology
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher American Psychological Association
Publisher_xml – name: American Psychological Association
SSID ssj0003663
Score 2.4110968
Snippet Previous meta-analyses of the effects of peer tutoring on academic achievement have been plagued with theoretical and methodological flaws. Specifically, these...
SourceID eric
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 558
SubjectTerms Academic Achievement
Best Practices
Effect Size
Literature Reviews
Meta Analysis
Peer Teaching
Program Effectiveness
Research Methodology
Role Theory
Standardized Tests
Teacher Education
Tutoring
Title Preliminary Empirical Model of Crucial Determinants of Best Practice for Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement
URI http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1061885
Volume 107
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV09b8IwED2VdoClamlRv3VD16iJ7TgwthSEkFoxgMSG4visItGAEAv_vudgKEulblEiZbiz796znt8BPOs8KXzdj4w0KlI5L2PDSDlKjJM2s0pr5y8Kf3zqwUQNp-n09-jiv4rKoWcy7XZag5oQ8Z71hAIsdRigxjzLd9S956zMXnLvt6I77TrUD_8ISuejttK_gPOAB_F1l8BLOKGy6UcpB9lFExqHErW9gnK0pkU1h2u9xd73al4ZfKAfaLbApcMuZ4oXFL4fiVz8-zeu_TgKF6KQcSqOiNY49gYG3LtwWeJeKM8PX3OqXMQ31zDp98bdQRQmJkS5VGIT5RxsKjRl1gMLpn5pHFsnMkGMc5xSRC4hhnSFYxyUVmCp40mqEdrFVjvRgtNyWdINYFFQESe5spY5oD8oFUyWjSQZWyu0tLfQ8lGbrXamGLNDOO_--nAPDUYb6U4t-ABnjvcXPXJL35inKoE_2oqcXA
linkProvider ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preliminary+Empirical+Model+of+Crucial+Determinants+of+Best+Practice+for+Peer+Tutoring+on+Academic+Achievement&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+educational+psychology&rft.au=Leung%2C+Kim+Chau&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.pub=American+Psychological+Association&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=558&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fa0037698&rft.externalDocID=EJ1061885
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-0663&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-0663&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-0663&client=summon