Simultaneous bacteriologic assessment of bile from gallbladder and common bile duct in control subjects and patients with gallstones and common duct stones

To determine the simultaneous prevalence of bacteria in bile from the gallbladder and common bile duct and to determine the influence of the number of stones present on bacteriologic findings. A prospective study was performed in 467 subjects divided into seven groups: 42 control subjects with norma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) Vol. 131; no. 4; p. 389
Main Authors Csendes, A, Burdiles, P, Maluenda, F, Diaz, J C, Csendes, P, Mitru, N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.1996
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information
ISSN0004-0010
DOI10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160047008

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To determine the simultaneous prevalence of bacteria in bile from the gallbladder and common bile duct and to determine the influence of the number of stones present on bacteriologic findings. A prospective study was performed in 467 subjects divided into seven groups: 42 control subjects with normal biliary tracts, 221 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease, 12 patients with hydropic gallbladder, 52 patients with acute cholecystitis, 67 patients with common bile duct stones without cholangitis, 49 patients with common bile duct stones and acute cholangitis, and 24 patients with previous cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. In all except controls, bile samples from the gallbladder and common bile duct were taken simultaneously for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Control subjects had no bacteria in gallbladder bile. Patients with gallstones, acute cholecystitis, and hydropic gallbladder had similar rates of positive cultures in the gallbladder and common bile duct, ranging from 22% to 46%, but the rate was significantly higher in patients with common bile duct stones without cholangitis (58.2%). Patients with cholangitis or previous cholecystectomy had a high rate of positive cultures of common duct bile (93% to 100%). Age greater than 60 years had a significant influence on the rate of positive bile cultures. There was no relationship between the number of stones in the gallbladder or common bile duct and the percentage of positive cultures. In 98% of the patients, the same bacteria were isolated from gallbladder and common duct bile. In normal subjects, no bacteria were present in the biliary tract. Among patients with common bile duct stones, there was an increasing percentage of positive cultures according to the severity of the disease. Age had an important influence, but sex and the number of common bile duct stones had no influence on positive cultures.
AbstractList To determine the simultaneous prevalence of bacteria in bile from the gallbladder and common bile duct and to determine the influence of the number of stones present on bacteriologic findings. A prospective study was performed in 467 subjects divided into seven groups: 42 control subjects with normal biliary tracts, 221 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease, 12 patients with hydropic gallbladder, 52 patients with acute cholecystitis, 67 patients with common bile duct stones without cholangitis, 49 patients with common bile duct stones and acute cholangitis, and 24 patients with previous cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. In all except controls, bile samples from the gallbladder and common bile duct were taken simultaneously for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Control subjects had no bacteria in gallbladder bile. Patients with gallstones, acute cholecystitis, and hydropic gallbladder had similar rates of positive cultures in the gallbladder and common bile duct, ranging from 22% to 46%, but the rate was significantly higher in patients with common bile duct stones without cholangitis (58.2%). Patients with cholangitis or previous cholecystectomy had a high rate of positive cultures of common duct bile (93% to 100%). Age greater than 60 years had a significant influence on the rate of positive bile cultures. There was no relationship between the number of stones in the gallbladder or common bile duct and the percentage of positive cultures. In 98% of the patients, the same bacteria were isolated from gallbladder and common duct bile. In normal subjects, no bacteria were present in the biliary tract. Among patients with common bile duct stones, there was an increasing percentage of positive cultures according to the severity of the disease. Age had an important influence, but sex and the number of common bile duct stones had no influence on positive cultures.
Author Csendes, P
Mitru, N
Maluenda, F
Diaz, J C
Burdiles, P
Csendes, A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A
  surname: Csendes
  fullname: Csendes, A
  organization: Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Unit, University Hospital, Santiago, Chile
– sequence: 2
  givenname: P
  surname: Burdiles
  fullname: Burdiles, P
– sequence: 3
  givenname: F
  surname: Maluenda
  fullname: Maluenda, F
– sequence: 4
  givenname: J C
  surname: Diaz
  fullname: Diaz, J C
– sequence: 5
  givenname: P
  surname: Csendes
  fullname: Csendes, P
– sequence: 6
  givenname: N
  surname: Mitru
  fullname: Mitru, N
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8615724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkL1qwzAUhTWkpEnaRyho6OpUP7YljyX0DwId2s7hWpITBVkKkkzps_Rla5wMne7h8PHBuUs088EbhO4pWVNC6ANEdUhD3K9p09RrQktOaE1IKQiRM7QgYyxGjlyjZUrHMTHZsDmay5pWgpUL9Pth-8Fl8CYMCbegsok2uLC3CkNKJqXe-IxDh1vrDO5i6PEenGsdaG0iBq-xCn0f_BnQg8rY-rHzOQaH09AejcppAk-Q7WhL-Nvmw6RJedyT_lsmwbm-QVcduGRuL3eFvp6fPjevxfb95W3zuC2A8zoXrFPAJRPQNoITKXWluZCM04oLVaqOGgWaMgJK1lUrK6BCUWO0IA0zpGrYCt2dvaeh7Y3enaLtIf7sLk9if47dcTQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ehmc_2015_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1556_maseb_66_2013_6_8
crossref_primary_10_4103_jcrt_JCRT_1705_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcp_2024_101970
crossref_primary_10_4103_ejs_ejs_239_23
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11739_018_1861_7
crossref_primary_10_4103_eus_eus_41_19
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000011234
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_006_0078_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00534_006_1160_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1091_255X_00_80090_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_020_00336_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_15466
crossref_primary_10_36106_ijsr_3225443
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinf_2019_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jchirv_2012_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13099_023_00587_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_life12101540
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12144711
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i29_6690
crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_12937
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60071040
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2020_12_020
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2021_625589
crossref_primary_10_23873_2074_0506_2023_15_2_238_250
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1499_3872_16_60109_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_82603_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijantimicag_2024_107086
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms10020312
crossref_primary_10_1128_JCM_02469_12
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_016_0082_5
crossref_primary_10_9738_INTSURG_D_20_00046_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jviscsurg_2013_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_011_0263_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2004_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_3156_2001_00748_x
crossref_primary_10_1089_sur_2016_261
crossref_primary_10_1159_000431071
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1477_2574_2012_00582_x
crossref_primary_10_5662_wjm_v3_i4_45
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_002_6232_9
crossref_primary_10_14260_Jemds_2017_865
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12030482
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00534_006_1157_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0211_3449_08_73105_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2017_00685
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v21_i24_7506
crossref_primary_10_1089_109629603322419571
crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop201723625_71
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics10010071
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000265
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmi_2024_12_039
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10194297
crossref_primary_10_1186_1752_1947_5_499
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0950_3528_97_90014_2
crossref_primary_10_1308_003588406X149327
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2005_07_014
crossref_primary_10_5812_archcid_17090
crossref_primary_10_1089_sur_2020_358
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00534_012_0572_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0089243
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms8060835
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_012_1572_6
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrmicro2490
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10156_013_0616_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0168_8278_00_80153_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_13651820310025192
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_021_06107_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2015_07_013
crossref_primary_10_36106_paripex_9606435
crossref_primary_10_1002_hep_510270304
crossref_primary_10_5897_AJMR2012_1173
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cger_2020_08_005
crossref_primary_10_4166_kjg_2018_71_5_264
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_007_0703_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2009_05_010
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_tvir_2015_07_009
crossref_primary_10_5662_wjm_v6_i2_154
crossref_primary_10_1097_XCS_0000000000000259
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_518
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines11082124
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_10893
crossref_primary_10_3390_life14060698
crossref_primary_10_4103_ccij_ccij_61_19
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_020_01977_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2021_621525
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00534_011_0463_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_acem_13132
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_019_01933_0
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160047008
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
ExternalDocumentID 8615724
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-QF
.55
.XZ
23N
2CT
2WC
354
39C
3O-
4.4
53G
5GY
6J9
AAWTL
AAYEP
ABCQX
ABJNI
ABOCM
ACGFO
ACGFS
ADBBV
AFFNX
AI.
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJDE
ARBJA
BRYMA
C1A
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
EAM
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F5P
GX1
IH2
J5H
L7B
N4W
N9A
NPM
OB2
OBH
OHH
OVD
P2P
RAJ
RWL
RXW
SJN
SV3
TAE
TEORI
VH1
VVN
VXZ
WH7
WOW
X6Y
X7M
XHN
YOC
ZE2
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a336t-2fca3827ab973088d5d378231537c4cf1ecad120ac865b85a17c1eed7092e0592
ISSN 0004-0010
IngestDate Wed Feb 19 02:35:49 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a336t-2fca3827ab973088d5d378231537c4cf1ecad120ac865b85a17c1eed7092e0592
PMID 8615724
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_8615724
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1996-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1996-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 1996
  text: 1996-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)
PublicationTitleAlternate Arch Surg
PublicationYear 1996
SSID ssj0012892
Score 1.3973873
Snippet To determine the simultaneous prevalence of bacteria in bile from the gallbladder and common bile duct and to determine the influence of the number of stones...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 389
SubjectTerms Acute Disease
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bile - microbiology
Cholecystitis - etiology
Cholecystitis - microbiology
Cholelithiasis - complications
Cholelithiasis - microbiology
Chronic Disease
Common Bile Duct
Female
Gallbladder
Gallstones - microbiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Title Simultaneous bacteriologic assessment of bile from gallbladder and common bile duct in control subjects and patients with gallstones and common duct stones
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8615724
Volume 131
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NTuMwELYKCNQLWgSI35UP3KpUiZ3E6RHBrhASe1mQuCHbcaQiKIi2F16FJ-KtmPE4rfnVspcosqNRkvkymRnPfGbsAGKb2pVYNqhdmYCVFIkWpkyKzA6MlM7KAhuFz_6UJxf56WVx2ek8R1VL04np28cP-0r-R6swBnrFLtlvaHYmFAbgHPQLR9AwHP9Jx3-HWA-oRw7rWA3xLpMx6-kZ4ya6gwa-feokwYV2c4Pm5qFtaYPbpQuQ-rXn69KpfH08Nde-2MOTCRABa-iGQzHoNrpxLMULoOHY6Y3ZbcfUhu0Xj6kKpN-DzzONMhJHmO0m6zVPtE4ByGF77llH2pnG_VVq_apA-XiofU78NOR_69DiV0aFMK2VhoE0lLu2VlpmERzzyOZK2oPo3b-A9iDwDT7waNiWWfaRzRA59dJcpZ5PYhLB5P7W46QCJ09RY_eXk294usPMAluAgAV3YMW0UVjOgqiWaOvDg62wg5b-6qv767LlIPVN0OOdn_MfbDVELfyQILjGOm60zp5i-PFX8ONz-PG7hiO6OMKPR_DjABxOwKELED18OOIBfryFn7-whR9H-PE5_GIpXgANb7CL37_Oj06SsNdHoqUsJ4lorJaVUNoM4J9TVXVRS4VL1IVUNrdN5qyuM5FqW5WFqQqdKZuBf6fSgXAQIohNtjgC-VuMV40Sla6V002am4E1yqkC0_3KNMJmYptt0ru8uidCl6vwknc-m9hl3TlO99hSA_bD7YMzOjE_vaJfAELbjXQ
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simultaneous+bacteriologic+assessment+of+bile+from+gallbladder+and+common+bile+duct+in+control+subjects+and+patients+with+gallstones+and+common+duct+stones&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+surgery+%28Chicago.+1960%29&rft.au=Csendes%2C+A&rft.au=Burdiles%2C+P&rft.au=Maluenda%2C+F&rft.au=Diaz%2C+J+C&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.issn=0004-0010&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001%2Farchsurg.1996.01430160047008&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F8615724&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F8615724&rft.externalDocID=8615724
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0004-0010&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0004-0010&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0004-0010&client=summon