Synthesis and Structural Comparison of a Series of Divalent Ln(TpR,R‘)2 (Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb) and Trivalent Sm(TpMe 2 )2X (X = F, Cl, I, BPh4) Complexes

Reaction of LnI2 (Ln = Sm, Yb) with two equivalents of NaTpMe 2 or reduction of Eu(TpMe 2 )2OTf gives good yields of the highly insoluble homoleptic Ln(II) complexes, Ln(TpMe 2 )2 (Ln = Sm (1a), Yb (2a), Eu (3a)). Use of the additionally 4-ethyl substituted TpMe2,4Et ligand produces the analogous, b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInorganic chemistry Vol. 40; no. 20; pp. 5106 - 5116
Main Authors Hillier, Anna C, Zhang, Maunder, Graham H, Liu, Sung Ying, Eberspacher, Todd A, Metz, Mathew V, McDonald, Robert, Domingos, Ângela, Marques, Noémia, Day, Victor W, Sella, Andrea, Takats, Josef
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 24.09.2001
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reaction of LnI2 (Ln = Sm, Yb) with two equivalents of NaTpMe 2 or reduction of Eu(TpMe 2 )2OTf gives good yields of the highly insoluble homoleptic Ln(II) complexes, Ln(TpMe 2 )2 (Ln = Sm (1a), Yb (2a), Eu (3a)). Use of the additionally 4-ethyl substituted TpMe2,4Et ligand produces the analogous, but soluble Ln(TpMe 2 ,4Et)2 (1−3b) complexes. Soluble compounds are also obtained with the TpPh and TpTn ligands (Tn = thienyl), Ln(TpPh)2 (Ln = Sm, 1c; Yb, 2c) and Ln(TpTn)2 (Ln = Sm, 1d; Yb, 2d). To provide benchmark parameters for structural comparison the series of Sm(TpMe 2 )2X complexes (X = F, 1e; Cl, 1f; Br, 1g; I, 1h; BPh4, 1j) were prepared either via oxidation of the Sm(TpMe 2 )2 or salt metathesis from SmX3 (X = Cl, Br, I). The solid-state structures of 1−3a, 1b, 1−2c and 1e, 1f, 1h, and 1j were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The homoleptic bis-Tp complexes are all six-coordinate with trigonal antiprismatic geometries, planes of the κ3-Tp ligands are parallel to one another. In the series of Sm(TpMe 2 )2X complexes the structure changes from seven-coordinate molecular compounds, with intact Sm-X bonds, for X = F, Cl, to six-coordinate ionic structures [Sm(TpMe 2 )2]X (X = I, BPh4), suitable crystals of the bromide compound could not be obtained. The dependence of the structures on the size of X is understandable in terms of the interplay between the size of the cleft that the [Sm(TpMe 2 )2]+ fragment can make available and the donor ability of the anionic group toward the hard Sm(III) center.
Bibliography:istex:320759EDA3CF97C38CB088DB0E8CCBB8208C0F16
ark:/67375/TPS-J8LCKNC5-C
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/ic010325w