Quality of synthetic speech : perceptual dimensions, influencing factors, and instrumental assessment
This book reviews research towards perceptual quality dimensions of synthetic speech, compares these findings with the state of the art, and derives a set of five universal perceptual quality dimensions for TTS signals. They are: (i) naturalness of voice, (ii) prosodic quality, (iii) fluency and int...
Saved in:
Main Author | |
---|---|
Format | Electronic eBook |
Language | English |
Published |
Singapore :
Springer,
[2017]
|
Series | T-labs series in telecommunication services.
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Plný text |
Cover
Loading…
Table of Contents:
- Acknowledgements; Contents; Acronyms; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Motivation; 1.2 Outline; References; 2 Speech Synthesis; 2.1 Setup of a Speech Synthesizer; 2.1.1 Natural Language Processing (NLP); 2.1.2 Prosody Generation; 2.1.3 Concatenation and Generation of Speech-Signal Parameters; 2.1.4 Speech Signal Generation; 2.2 The Mary Text-to-Speech System (MaryTTS); References; 3 Auditory and Instrumental Quality Evaluation Metrics; 3.1 What Is Perceptual Quality?; 3.2 Taxonomy for the Quality Assessment of Synthetic Speech; 3.2.1 Glass Box Versus Black Box.
- 3.2.2 Laboratory Versus Field Studies3.2.3 Linguistic Versus Acoustic; 3.2.4 Auditory Versus Instrumental; 3.3 Auditory Quality Evaluation Metrics; 3.3.1 Functional TestsThe content of this section has previously been published in a slightly different version in [6].; 3.3.2 Judgment TestsParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [13] and [6].; 3.4 Instrumental Quality Evaluation Metrics; 3.4.1 Reference-Based MeasuresParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [21].
- 3.4.2 Reference-Free MeasuresReferences; 4 Perceptual Quality Dimensions; 4.1 State-of-the-Art Perceptual Quality DimensionsParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [1].; 4.1.1 Study: Kraft and Portele (Kraft1995); 4.1.2 Study: Mayo et al. I (Mayo2005); 4.1.3 Study: Viswanathan and Viswanathan (Vis2005); 4.1.4 Study: Seget (Seget2007); 4.1.5 Study: Hinterleitner (Hint2010); 4.1.6 Study: Mayo et al. II (Mayo2011); 4.1.7 Restrictions of Discussed Studies.
- 4.2 Semantic Differential and Factor AnalysisParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [13].4.2.1 Experimental Setup; 4.2.2 Statistical Analysis; 4.3 Sorting Task and Multidimensional ScalingParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [16].; 4.3.1 Experimental Setup; 4.3.2 Statistical Analysis; 4.4 Summary of the SD/FA and ST/MDS StudiesParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [16].
- 4.5 4.5 Universal Perceptual Quality Dimensions4.5.1 Naturalness of Voice; 4.5.2 Prosodic Quality; 4.5.3 Fluency and Intelligibility; 4.5.4 Absence of Disturbances; 4.5.5 Calmness; 4.5.6 Instructions for TTS Quality Assessment; 4.6 Summary; References; 5 Influencing Factors on Perceptual Quality; 5.1 Influence of the ApplicationParts of the content of this section have previously been published in a slightly different version in [1].; 5.1.1 Pretest; 5.1.2 Main TestThe content of this section has previously been published in a slightly different version in [10].; 5.1.3 Conclusions.